Share This Article:

Water Analyses, Eco-Balance and Socio-Demographic Analyses as Prerequisites for Solutions of the Sewage Treatment Problems in Rural Areas

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:377KB) PP. 73-78
DOI: 10.4236/gep.2015.310012    2,288 Downloads   2,648 Views  

ABSTRACT

The implementation of the EU-water framework directive (EU-WFD) demands a financeable and adaptable sewage treatment, creating a need for action especially in rural areas, where the “good ecological status” is often not reached even though the sewage works fulfill the legal minimum requirements. Therefore the construction of new, more efficient wastewater treatment plants is advisable. Due to the precarious financial situation in most rural areas, many municipalities can however not master the necessary funds for an improved waste water infrastructure. A large part of the costs would have to be shouldered by the local population in the form of additional sewage levies, leading to massive socio-economic strain. Hence, different solutions, which are tailored to the socio-economic, demographic and environmental characteristics of rural areas and fulfill the legal requirements, need to be developed. One possible approach is presented in the form of the Dirlammen case study (municipality Lautertal, Hesse, Germany). It consists of 1) biological and physicochemical analyses of the waste waters, 2) a modified eco-balance for the construction of a new sewage works and 3) socio-economic and demographic analyses of the population. It serves as a tool for the assessment of the influencing ecological, socio-economic and demographic factors on the sewage problems in rural areas. These findings can easily be transferred to other rural areas with a similar configuration and thus deliver the basis for a generally applicable approach to these problems. The results of the comprehensive analysis have shown for the municipality Dirlammen/Lautertal that the continued operation of the existing pond sewage plant is, with regards to the ecological, socio-economic and demographic points of view, preferable to the construction of a new waste water treatment plant. With regard to the sustainability principles of the sewage treatment and the objectives of the EU-WFD, existing sewage works should be operated for as long as the sewage treatment is feasible within technical and legal boundaries. With the construction of new facilities on the other hand, the expected improvement of the water quality has to be weighed against the ecological impairments caused by the construction itself. Rural waste water plans have to be developed for the long-term, taking not only the ecology into account but also the demographic change. Possible approaches in this regard could be a shift towards a decentralized waste water treatment concept and–even more important–improvements of the river morphology. But also the reduction of the diffuse pollution from agricultural sources should be considered for the development of strategies for the improvement of the ecological state. Short-term optimization measures in the existing sewage works might also improve the water quality until the long-term development plans can be implemented. In particular the challenges of the demographic change and linked with that the changing requirements for the rural waste water treatment must be addressed by any future plans. Only with the help of such a comprehensive approach the dangers of bad planning and unacceptable socio-economic burdens can be minimized.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Opp, C. and Ziebolz, B. (2015) Water Analyses, Eco-Balance and Socio-Demographic Analyses as Prerequisites for Solutions of the Sewage Treatment Problems in Rural Areas. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 73-78. doi: 10.4236/gep.2015.310012.

References

[1] European Waterframework Directive (EU-WFD) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Official Jounal L327, 22/12/2000 P 0001-0073.
[2] Groll, M. and Opp, Ch. (2007) Gew?sserbettmorphologie und Habitate in einem renaturierten Abschnitt der Lahn. Exemplarische Anwendung des TRiSHa-Verfahrens. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 39, 369-376.
[3] Landesamt für Umweltschutz Sachsen-Anhalt (LfU) (2006) Abwasserteichanlagen zur kommunalen Abwasserreinigung (Hinweise zu Planung, Bau, Betrieb und Optimierung). Fachbereich 2 Abfallwirtschaft, Bodenschutz, Anlagentechnik Wasserwirtschaft, Halle.
[4] Borchard, D. and Menadi, F. (2001) Empfehlungen für die Errichtung und den Betrieb von belüfteten Teichkl?ranlagen. Institut für Gew?sserforschung und Gew?sserschutz (IAG) & Universit?t Gesamthochschule Kassel.
[5] http://www.wtw.de/downloads/manuals/
[6] LAWA-AO (2007) Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser-Ausschuss Oberirdische Gew?sser und Küstengew?sser Rahmenkonzeption Monitoring. Teil B: Bewertungsgrundlagen und Methodenbeschreibung. Arbeitspapier 2. Hintergrund- und Orientierungswerte für physikalisch-chemische Komponenten.
[7] Kl?pfer, W. and Grahl, B. (2009) ?kobilanz (LCA)—Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Weinheim. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527627158
[8] Institut für angewandte ?kologie (2010) Globales Emissions-Modell integrierter Systeme. Version 4.5.
[9] Schnell, R. (1999) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München.
[10] Gebhardt, H., Glaser, R., Radtke, U. and Reuber, P. (2007) Geographie. Physische Geographieund Humangeographie. München.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.