Share This Article:

Market and Value Chain Analyses of Marketable Natural Products from Agroforestry Systems in Eastern Sudan

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:511KB) PP. 57-73
DOI: 10.4236/gep.2015.39006    2,584 Downloads   3,122 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The objectives of the present study were: 1) to identify the prioritized marketable natural products (NPs) from agroforestry systems (AFS), and 2) to conduct market value chain analyses of the most important and prioritized NPs to identify markets and marketing channels; actors, functions and characteristics; constraints and opportunities to entry and growth; opportunities for value addition, and conduct analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis). The study was conducted in the Refugees’ camps and their hosting communities in Eastern Sudan. Using the participatory value chain analysis (PVCA) approach, it was found that communities in the project sites obtained a multiplicity of NPs for sustenance and for increasing their incomes. Eight products were identified and ranked as the most important NPs with greatest opportunities for enterprise development at the community level. These are: gum Arabic, honey, fodder, non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and tree seeds. Gum Arabic has been shown to score higher ranks in terms of a) marketability b) ecological suitability (availability), c) social suitability, and d) potential for value addition. The results show that marketing of gum Arabic in the study site is characterized by a large number of producers and relatively few traders and companies work through seven marketing channels. The results demonstrate that in the customary marketing channel there is an upward skewed benefit distribution among the value chain actors. The total relative commercialization margin was 80% indicating that “traders” accrued higher proportion, while “producers”, receive less income (20%) of the end market price. Poor land security, one-sided prices, taxes and levies, lack of finance and appropriate skills are major impediments to gum commodity growth and development. One of the most important opportunities for growth and entry of Gum Arabic are: it is natural organic product and thus well-fit for fair trade, environmentally sustainable and organic market development. Numerous opportunities exist in the site for value addition and distribution synergies and gender-specific development, including that gum Arabic has high synergy with natural resource management and other sectors for enhancing regional and national growth. The study concludes that Gum Arabic production and marketing is financially profitable for producers, traders and companies and has the potential to open new markets and bring new opportunities to smallholder farmers. However, technical, financial, and institutional support could result in an increase in local actors’ income and contribute to sustainability of the supply of the product.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

El Tahir, B. and Vishwanath, A. (2015) Market and Value Chain Analyses of Marketable Natural Products from Agroforestry Systems in Eastern Sudan. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 57-73. doi: 10.4236/gep.2015.39006.

References

[1] Kaplinsky, R. and Morris, M. (2000) A Handbook for Value Chain Research. IDRC.
http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/global/pdfs/VchNov01.pdf
[2] FAO (2004) Commodity Chains for Pro-Poor Rural Growth. Operational Guidelines, Rome.
[3] UNIDO (2011) Pro-Poor Value Chain Development: 25 Guiding Questions for Designing and Implementing Agroindustry Projects. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna.
[4] Lecup, I. and Nicholson, K. (2009) Community-Based Tree and Forest Products Enterprises: Market Analysis and Development. FAO, Rome.
[5] Lusby, F. And Panlibuton, H. (2007) Value Chain Program Design: Promoting Market-Based Solutions for MSME and Industry Competitiveness. Office of Microenterprise Development, Said/G/Egad/MD, Washington DC.
[6] Humphrey, J. and Navas-Alemán, L. (2010) Value Chains, Donor Interventions, and Poverty Reduction: A Review of Donor Practice. IDS Research Report 63, Brighton.
[7] Stoian, D., Donovan, J., Fisk, J. and Muldoon, M. (2012) Value Chain Development for Rural Poverty Reduction: A Reality Check and a Warning. Enterprise Development and Microfinance, 23, 54-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2012.006
[8] Donovan, J., Cunha, M., Franzel, S., Gyau, A. and Mithofer, D. (2013) Guides for Value Chain Development—A Comparative Review. CTA & World Agroforestry Centre, Wageningen.
[9] Staritz, C. (2012) Value Chains for Development: Potentials and Limitations of Global Value Chain Approaches in Donor Interventions. Austrian Research Foundation for International Development, Vienna.
[10] Bammann, H. (2007) Participatory Value Chain Analysis for Improved Farmer Incomes, Employment Opportunities and Food Security. Pacific Economic Bulletin, 22, 113-125.
[11] Eltayeb, G. and Osman, H.M.E.M. (2011) Land Tenure and Baseline Study for the Project: Securing Rights and Restoring Lands for Improved Livelihoods Kassala and Gedaref States-Sudan (Final Report).
[12] JECFA, Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (1997) Supersedes Specifications Prepared at the 49th JECFA, 1997. Published in FNP 52 Add 5 (1997). C.A.S. No. 9000-01-5.
http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/jecfa-additives/specs/Monograph1/
[13] Couteaudie, T.Y. (2007) Export Marketing of Sudanese Gum Arabic. SUDAN MULTI-Donor Trust Funds, MDTF-National, Sector Policy Note, Multi Donor Trust Fund-National Technical Secretariat, the World Bank, Khartoum.
[14] GAC, Gum Arabic Company (1996) Paper Presented on Problems and Constraints of Marketing Gum Arabic. Gum Arabic Conference, Friendship Hall (19 October 1996), Department of Research and Statistics, Gum Arabic Company, Paper No. 9/96, Khartoum, Sudan, 8.
[15] Forman, S. (2102) Revitalizing the Sudan Gum Arabic Production and Marketing. P110588-Report on Implementation Status and Results. Report No. ISR8088.
[16] Mahmoud, T.E. (2004) The Adequacy of Price Incentives on Production, Processing and Marketing of Gum Arabic in Sudan. A Case of North and West Kordofan. PhD Thesis, TU Dresden, Dresden.
[17] Taha, M.E. (2006) The Socio-Economic Role of Acacia Senegal in Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in the Gum Belt of the Sudan. PhD Thesis, TU Dresden, Dresden.
[18] Karama, M.M. (2001) Gum Arabic: Present Situation and Future Prospects. Department of Research and Statistics, Gum Arabic Company, Paper No. 3/01, Khartoum, 13.
[19] Khalid, A.M. (2005) Annual Reports and Archive Unit. Note No. 28-2005, Ministry of Finance, North Kordofan State, 17.
[20] Martin, B., Wayland, G. and Werner, S. (1987) Economics. 2nd Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
[21] Schrekenberg, K., Marshal, E., Newton, A., Velde, D., Rushton, J. and Edouard, F. (2006) Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products: What Determines Success? Forestry Briefing. Overseas Development Institute, London, 6 p.
[22] Markin, J. (1982) Marketing Strategy and Management. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken.
[23] Tieguhong, J.C. and Ndoye, O. (2004) Development of Trade and Marketing of NTFP for Poverty Alleviation in Africa. CIFOR, Yaounde, 48 p.
[24] Tieguhong, J.C. and Ndoye, O. (2006) Transforming Subsistence Products to Propellers of Sustainable Rural Development: Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) Production and Trade in Cameroon. In: Wohlmuth, K., Burger, P., Gutowski, A., Hussain, M.N., Kneduk, T. and Meyn, M., Eds., Africa-Escaping the Primary Commodities Dilemma, African Development Perspective Yearbook, Vol. 11, Unit 1, Lit Verlag, Berlin, 107-138.
[25] Jensen, A. (2009) Valuation of Non-Timber Forest Products Value Chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 34-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.002
[26] Gwary, M.M., Donye, A.O., Wakawa, R.C. and Shallangwa, M.D. (2013) Constraints to Extension Service Delivery in the Production, Processing and Marketing of Gum Arabic in Magumeri Local Government Area of Borno State, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 4, 126-131.
[27] Velde, D.W., Marshall, E., Newton, A. and Schrenkenberg, K. (2004) Successful NTFP Commercialization. A Quantitative Analysis Based on Household and Trader Level Data. UNEP-WCMC and ODI Report, 94 p.
[28] Tieguhong J.C., Ndoye O., Tchatat, M. and Chikamai, B. (2009) Processing and Marketing of Non-Wood Forest Products for Poverty Alleviation in Africa. Discovery and Innovation, 21, 60-65.
[29] Wekesaa, C., Luvandaa, A.M., Mugaa, M.O., Chikamaia, B.N. and Makenzib, P.M. (2013) Market Chain Analysis of Gum Arabic Trade in Kenya. Octa Journal of Environmental Research, 1, 93-106.
http://www.sciencebeingjournal.com

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.