Share This Article:

Smiley Faces: The Evaluation of Watches as a Function of the Time Displayed

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:640KB) PP. 1850-1854
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.614181    2,529 Downloads   2,922 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Wristwatch advertisements show a preference for having the watch hands displaying the time 1:50 or 10:10 which suggest a “smiley face”. This paper reports two studies, one with students, the other with non-students. Participants rated six different watches showing six times on four different scales: perceived attractiveness, expensiveness, the income level of the typical wearer of the watch, and the sense of style of the typical wearer of the watch. Time shown had no effect on the ratings of the watches. Implications and limitations are considered.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Furnham, A. , King, J. and Kolzeev, V. (2015) Smiley Faces: The Evaluation of Watches as a Function of the Time Displayed. Psychology, 6, 1850-1854. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.614181.

References

[1] Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968-1987. Psychological Review, 106, 265-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
[2] Canli, T., Sivers, H., Whitfield, S. L., Gotlib, I. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Amygdala Response to Happy Faces as a Function of Extraversion. Science, 296, 2191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1068749
[3] Dumitrescu, A. (2010). A Model of Product Personality. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on European Computing Conference (pp. 88-93). Bucharest: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
[4] Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry (2013). February Monthly Analysis.
[5] Govers, P. C. M., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). Product Personality and its Influence on Consumer Preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 189-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760510605308
[6] Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2000). The Attractiveness of Nonface Averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces. Psychological Science, 11, 285-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00257
[7] Janlert, L. E., & Stolerman, E. (1997). The Character of Things. Design Studies, 18, 297-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00004-5
[8] Jones, R., & Hafner, C. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies. New York: Routledge
[9] Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 819-831.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/523290
[10] Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. (2013) When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization Amid Product Wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 77, 81-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0510
[11] Thompson, J. (2012). Million-Dollar Club: What Watch Brands Spent the Most on Advertising in 2011? WatchTime.com.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.