Share This Article:

Differences in Root Growth and Permeability in the Grafted Combinations of Dutch Tomato Cultivars (Starbuck and Maxifort) and Japanese Cultivars (Reiyo, Receive, and Magnet)

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:677KB) PP. 2640-2650
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.616266    2,793 Downloads   3,140 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Grafting is widely established in agriculture and provides practical advantages for vegetable production. We investigated physiological differences between the grafted combinations of Dutch (Starbuck and Maxifort) and Japanese (Reiyo, Receive and Magnet) tomato cultivars. Plants were grown hydroponically until the flowers on the first truss bloomed, and the following parameters were measured: fresh weight of the aerial parts, root surface area, root permeability (by using a pressure chamber), and water potential of exudates (by using an isopiestic psychrometer). The Starbuck/Maxifort combination had higher values of the aerial part weight, root surface area, and root permeability than Reiyo/Receive, whereas Reiyo/Maxifort tended to have higher values of these parameters than Reiyo/Receive and Reiyo/Magnet. Maxifort had a significantly larger root surface area than Receive, but root permeability was not significantly different. InReiyo/Maxifort and Starbuck/Receive, these parameters were not significantly different except for a single comparison of root permeability. Thus, root permeability and root surface area may depend not only on the rootstock but be also affected by scion in grafted plants. Water potential of exudates was similar in most combinations and experiments. This shows that three rootstock cultivars provided similar nutrient concentrations even with different scions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kakita, T. , Abe, A. and Ikeda, T. (2015) Differences in Root Growth and Permeability in the Grafted Combinations of Dutch Tomato Cultivars (Starbuck and Maxifort) and Japanese Cultivars (Reiyo, Receive, and Magnet). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 2640-2650. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.616266.

References

[1] Ioannou, N. (2001) Integrating Soil Solarization with Grafting on Resistant Rootstocks for Management of Soil-Borne Pathogens of Eggplant. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 76, 396-401.
[2] Lee, J.M. (1994) Cultivation of Grafted Vegetables. I. Current Status, Grafting Methods and Benefits. HortScience, 29, 235-239.
[3] King, S.R., Davis, A.R., Liu, W. and Levi, A. (2008) Grafting for Disease Resistance. HortScience, 43, 1673-1676.
[4] Keinath, A.P. and Hassell, R.L. (2014) Control of Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon by Grafting onto Bottlegourd or Interspecific Hybrid Squash despite Colonization of Rootstocks by Fusarium. Plant Disease, 98, 255-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0100-RE
[5] Den Nijs, A.P.M. and Smeets, L. (1987) Analysis of Differences in Growth of Cucumber Genotypes under Low Light Conditions in Relation to Night Temperature. Euphytica, 36, 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00730643
[6] Tachibana, S. (1982) Comparison of Effects of Root Temperature on the Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Cucumber Cultivars and Figleaf Gourd. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 51, 299-308.
[7] Venema, J.H., Dijk, B.E., Bax, J.M., van Hasselt, P.R. and Elzenga, J.T.M. (2008) Grafting Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) onto the Rootstock of a High-Altitude Accession of Solanum habrochaites Improves Suboptimal-Temperature Tolerance. Environmental &Experimental Botany, 63, 359-367.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.12.015
[8] Estañ, M.T., Martinez-Rodriguez, M.M., Perez-Alfocea, F., Flowers, T.J. and Bolarin, M.C. (2005) Grafting Raises the Salt Tolerance of Tomato through Limiting the Transport of Sodium and Chloride to the Shoot. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 703-712.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri027
[9] Martinez-Rodriguez, M.M., Estañ, M.T., Moyano, E., Garcia-Abellan, J.O., Flores, F.B. Campos, J.F., Al-Azzawi, M.J., Flowers, T.J. and Bolarin, M.C. (2008) The Effectiveness of Grafting to Improve Salt Tolerance in Tomato When an “Excluder” Genotype Is Used as Scion. Environmental & Experimental Botany, 63, 392-401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.12.007
[10] Zekri, M. and Parsons, L.P. (1992) Salinity Tolerance of Citrus Rootstocks: Effects of Salt on Root and Leaf Mineral Concentrations. Plant &Soil, 147, 171-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00029069
[11] Aloni, B., Cohen, R., Karni, L., Aktas, H. and Edelstein, M. (2010) Hormonal Signaling in Rootstock-Scion Interactions. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 119-126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.003
[12] Dong, H.H., Niu, Y.H., Li, W.J. and Zhang, D.M. (2008) Effects of Cotton Rootstock on Endogenous Cytokinins and Abscisic Acid in Xylem Sap and Leaves in Relation to Leaf Senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 1295-1304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern035
[13] Proebsting, W.M., Hedden, P., Lewis, M.J., Croker, S.J. and Proebsting, L.N. (1992) Gibberellin Concentration and Transport in Genetic Lines of Pea. Plant Physiology, 100, 1354-1360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.3.1354
[14] Fernández-García, N., Martínez, V., Cerda, A. and Carvajal, M. (2004) Fruit Quality of Grafted Tomato Plants Grown under Saline Conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 79, 995-1001.
[15] Alan, Ö., Özdemir, N. and Gimen, Y. (2007) Effect of Grafting on Watermelon Plant Growth, Yield and Quality. Journal of Agronomy, 6, 362-365.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ja.2007.362.365
[16] Ruiz, J.M., Belakbir, A., Lopez-Cantarero, A. and Romero, L. (1997) Leaf-Macronutrient Content and Yield in Grafted Melon Plants: A Model to Evaluate the Influence of Rootstock Genotype. Scientia Horticulturae, 71, 227-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00106-4
[17] Ruiz, J.M. and Romero, L. (1999) Nitrogen Efficiency and Metabolism in Grafted Melon Plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 81, 113-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00200-3
[18] Furukawa, T., Ishikawa, K., Onuki, S., Mukai, K. and Ikeda, T. (2010) Permeability of Root Cells of Dutch “Dundee” and Japanese “Reiyo” Varieties of Tomato Seedlings to Hydroponic Solution and Potassium Ions. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 79, 287-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.79.287
[19] Furukawa, T., Ikeda, T. and Tomita, H. (2008) Growth, Quality and Rhizosphere State on Dutch and Japanese Varieties of Tomato Plants at Low Truss and High Planting Density under NFT. Horticulture Research, 7, 524. (In Japanese)
[20] Kakita, T., Mukai, K., Sato, Y., Nakamura, M. and Ikeda, T. (2011) Difference of Root Permeability of Dutch and Japanese Varieties of Single-Truss Tomato Plants. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Waikoloa, 25-28 September 2011, 116.
[21] Boyer, J.S. (1995) Measuring the Water Status of Plants and Soil. Academic Press, San Diego.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-012122260-4/50005-6
[22] Oyabu, T., Kato, M. and Sakakibara, M. (2009) Selection of Breeding Materials and Screening Method of Slicing Favorable Tomato Cultivar. Research Bulletin of Aichi Agricultural Research Center, 41, 61-66. (In Japanese)
[23] Matsuda, R., Nakano, A., Ahn, D.H., Suzuki, K., Yasuba, K. and Takaichi, M. (2011) Growth Characteristic and Sink Strength of Fruit at Different CO2 Concentrations in a Japanese and a Dutch Tomato Cultivar. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 528-534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.009
[24] Saito, T., Yong-Gen, Y., Matsuoka, M., Watanabe, S., Matsukura, C. and Fukuda, N. (2011) An Investigation of Differences in Fruit Yield and Components Contributing to Increased Yield in Japanese and Dutch Tomato Cultivars. Plant Biotechnology, 28, 455-461.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.11.0928a
[25] Matsuda, R., Suzuki, K., Nakano, A., Higashide, T. and Takaichi, M. (2011) Responses of Leaf Photosynthesis and Plant Growth to Altered Source-Sink Balance in a Japanese and a Dutch Tomato Cultivar. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 1298-1300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.008
[26] Else, M.A., Hall, K.C., Arnold, G.M., Davies, W.J. and Jackson, M.B. (1995) Export of Abscisic Acid, 1-Aminocyclo-propane-1-Carboxylic Acid, Phosphate, and Nitrate from Roots to Shoots of Flooded Tomato Plants. Plant Physiology, 107, 377-384.
[27] Jeschke, W.D. and Pate, J.S. (1991) Cation and Chloride Partitioning through Xylem and Phloem within the Whole Plant of Ricinus communis L. under Conditions of Salt Stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 42, 1105-1116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/42.9.1105
[28] Kanai, S., Moghaieb, R.E., El-Shemy, H.A., Panigrahi, R., Mohapatra, P.K., Ito, J., Nguyen, N.T., Saneoka, H. and Fujita, K. (2011) Potassium Deficiency Affects Water Status and Photosysthetic Rate of the Vegetative Sink in Greenhouse Tomato Prior to Its Effects on Source Activity. Plant Science, 180, 368-374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.10.011
[29] Nonami, H., Fukuyama, T. and Hashimoto, Y. (1998) Presence of Water Chemicals and Water Permeability in Tomato Roots under Salt-Stressed Conditions. Proceedings of Environmental Control in Biology, 282-283.
[30] Onuki, S., Mukai, K., Sato, Y., Furukawa, T. and Ikeda, T. (2010) Effect of Mercuric Chloride to Root Water Permeability on Dutch and Japanese Varieties of Tomato Seedlings. Horticulture Research, 9, 369. (In Japanese)
[31] Asanuma, S., Ookawa, T. and Hirasawa, T. (2007) The Resistance to Water Flow of the Osmotic Water Absorption and Transport in Rice Plants for Rapid Determination of Root Resistance to Water Transport. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 76, 246-247. (In Japanese)
[32] Miyamoto, N., Steudle, H., Hirasawa, T. and Lafitte, R. (2001) Hydraulic Conductivity of Rice Roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 1835-1486.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1835
[33] Murai-Hatano, M., Kuwagata, T., Sakurai, J., Nonami, H., Ahamed, A., Nagasuga, K., Matsunami, T., Fukushi, K., Maeshima, M. and Okada, M. (2008) Effect of Low Root Temperature on Hydraulic Conductivity of Rice Plants and the Possible Role of Aquaporins. Plant Production Science, 49, 1294-1305.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn104
[34] Ahn, D., Nakano, A., Matsuda, R., Higashide, T., Suzuki, K. and Takaichi, M. (2010) Effect of the Change of Sink Strength by Fruit Thinning on Growth in a Japanese and a Dutch Tomato Cultivar. Horticulture Research, 9, 238. (In Japanese)
[35] Ando, A., Wada, T., Hirai, H. and Abe, K. (2003) Effect of Rockwool-Cube Size and Days of Raising Seedlings on Growth and Root Activity of the Seedlings, Growth after Transplanting and Yield of Tomato Growth on Rockwool. Horticulture Research, 2, 297-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2503/hrj.2.297
[36] Kobayashi, S. and Kirimura, Y. (1999) Effects of Rockwool Cube Size and Root Limitation on Plant Growth and Fruit Yield of Lower-Truss Tomato by Hydroponics. Horticulture Research, 68, 307. (In Japanese)
[37] Santa-Cruz, A., Martinez-Rodriguez, M.M., Perez-Alfocea, F., Romero-Aranda, R. and Bolarin, M.C. (2002) The Rootstock Effect on the Tomato Salinity Response Depends on the Shoot Genotype. Plant Science, 162, 825-831.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00030-4
[38] Oda, M. (2001) Grafting of Vegetable Crops. Scientific Report of the Graduate School of Agriculture& Biological Science Osaka Prefecture University, 54, 49-72.
[39] Oda, M., Maruyama, M. and Mori, G. (2005) Water Transfer at Graft Union of Tomato Plants Grafted onto Solanum Rootstocks. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 74, 458-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.74.458
[40] Nagasuga, K., Murai-Hatano, M. and Kuwagata, T. (2011) Effect of Root Temperature on Dry Matter Production and Root Water Uptake in Rice Plants. Plant Production Science, 14, 22-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.14.22

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.