Share This Article:

Clonal Fidelity of Micropropagated Psidium guajava L. Plants Using Microsatellite Markers

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1445KB) PP. 2385-2392
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.614241    2,534 Downloads   3,265 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Micropropagation of Psidium guajava L. (guava) is a viable alternative to currently adopted techniques for large-scale plant propagation of commercial cultivars. Assessment of clonal fidelity in micropropagated plants is the first step towards ensuring genetic uniformity in mass production of planting material. In the present study, 31 plants of guava cultivar “Lucknow 49” regenerated by micropropagation were tested for genetic fidelity by comparing them to the mother plant from which explant material was obtained. Efficient rooting of in vitro proliferated shoots was obtained by culture on 1/2 strength MS medium supplemented with either 9.8 μM indole butyric acid (IBA) or 11.4 μM indole acetic acid (IAA). Leaf samples of 31 regenerated plants were compared to the mother plant using 17 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. While 16 SSRs detected the same allele, locus mPgCIR07 detected slight differences, where six micropropagated plants were 1 bp smaller (152 bp) than the parental genotype (153 bp). Differences in leaf tissues for anthocyanin pigmentation were also noted among micropropagated plants. Results of the study indicated efficient rooting of “Lucknow-49” cultivar for rapid propagation of planting material, and revealed that micropropagated plants were identical for 16 of the 17 loci examined. Although most mutations induced by tissue culture may not have an effect on phenotype, the possibility that novel phenotypes can be generated in a commercial setting exists.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rawls, B. , Harris-Shultz, K. , Dhekney, S. , Forrester, I. and Sitther, V. (2015) Clonal Fidelity of Micropropagated Psidium guajava L. Plants Using Microsatellite Markers. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 2385-2392. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.614241.

References

[1] Liu, X. and Yang, G. (2012) Assessment of Clonal Fidelity of Micro-Propagated Guava (Psidium guajava) Plants by ISSR Markers. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6, 291-295.
[2] Mahattanatawee, K., Manthey, J., Luzio, G., Talcott, S.T., Goodner, K. and Baldwin, E.A. (2006) Total Antioxidant Activity and Fiber Content of Select Florida-Grown Tropical Fruits. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 54, 7355-7363.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf060566s
[3] Preece, W.E. (1981) Fruit Nutrient Composition Table. Encyclopedia Britannica, 7, 766.
[4] USDA, NASS (2012) Guavas: 2011 Production up 46 Percent. Hawaii Farm Facts.
http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Hawaii/Publications/Fruits_and_Nuts/guavaFF.pdf
[5] Nakasone, Y.H. and Paul, R.E. (1998) Tropical Fruits. In: Crop Production Science in Horticulture Series, CAB International, Wallingford, 468.
[6] Abbas, M.M., Javed, M.A., Ishfaq, M. and Alvi, M.A. (2013) Grafting Techniques in Guava (Psidium guajava). Journal of Agricultural Research, 51, 465-470.
[7] Rai, M.K., Asthana, P., Jaiswal, V.S. and Jaiswal, U. (2010) Biotechnological Advances in Guava (Psidium guajava L.): Recent Developments and Prospects for Further Research. Trees, 24, 1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0384-2
[8] Cullis, C.A. (1992) The Molecular Biology of Plant Cells and Cultures. In: Fowler, M.W. and Warren, G.S., Eds., Plant Biotechnology, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-034731-8.50009-6
[9] Phillips, R.L., Kaeppler, S.M. and Othoft, P. (1994) Genetic Stability of Plant Tissue Cultures. Break down of Normal Controls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 5222-5226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.12.5222
[10] Martins, M., Sarmento, D. and Oliveira, M.M. (2004) Genetic Stability of Micropropagated Almond Plantlets as Assessed by RAPD and ISSR Markers. Plant Cell Reports, 23, 492-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0870-3
[11] Saker, M.M., Bekheet, S.A., Taha, H.S., Fahmy, A.S. and Moursy, H.A. (2000) Detection of Somaclonal Variations in Tissue Culture-Derived Date Palm Plants Using Isoenzyme Analysis and RAPD Fingerprints. Biologia Plantarum, 43, 347-351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026755913034
[12] Risterucci, A.M., Duval, M.F., Rohde, W. and Billotte, N. (2005) Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci from Psidium guajava L. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 745-748.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01050.x
[13] Kanupriya, P., Latha, M., Aswath, C., Reddy, L., Padmakar, B., Vasugi, C. and Dinesh, M.R. (2011) Cultivar Identification and Genetic Fingerprinting of Guava (Psidium guajava) Using Microsatellite Markers. International Journal of Fruit Science, 11, 184-196.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2011.578521
[14] Sitther, V., Zhang, D., Harris, D.L., Yadav, A.K., Zee, F.T., Meinhardt, L.W. and Dhekney, S.A. (2014) Genetic Characterization of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Germplasm in the United States Using Microsatellite Markers. Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution, 61, 829-839.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0078-5
[15] Kadam, D.M., Kaushik, P. and Kumar, R. (2012) Evaluation of Guava Products Quality. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition Engineering, 2, 7-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.food.20120201.02
[16] Jain, P.C. and Bhargava, M.C. (2007) Entomology: Novel Approaches. New India Publishing, New Delhi.
[17] Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for a Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Planatarium, 15, 473-497.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
[18] Sitther, V., Harris, D.L., Dhekney, S.A., Bai, J.A., Baldwin, E.A. and Yadav, A.K. (2011) Total Phenol Content of Guava Fruit and Development of an in Vitro Regeneration Protocol Amenable to Genetic Improvement. International Journal of Food Safety, Nutrition and Public Health, 4, 225-236.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJFSNPH.2011.044625
[19] SAS (2003) Users’ Guide, Statistics. Statistical Analysis System, Inc., Raleigh.
[20] Rohlf, F.J. (2008) NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System, ver. 2.20. Exeter Publications, Setauket.
[21] Nei, M. and Li, W.H. (1979) Mathematical Model for Studying Genetic Variation in Terms of Restriction Endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 76, 5269-5273.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
[22] Hampl, V., Pavlícek, A. and Flegr, J. (2001) Construction and Bootstrap Analysis of DNA Fingerprinting-Based Phylogenetic Trees with a Freeware Program Free Tree: Application to Trichomonad Parasites. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 51, 731-735.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-3-731
[23] Ali, N., Mulwa, R.M.S., Norton, M.A. and Skirvin, R.M. (2003) Micropropagation of Guava (Psidium guajava L.). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 78, 739-741.
[24] Singh, M., Jaiswal, U. and Jaiswal, V.S. (2004) In Vitro Regeneration and Improvement in Tropical Fruit Trees: An Assessment. In: Srivastava, P.S., Narula, A. and Srivastava, S., Eds., Plant Biotechnology and Molecular Markers, Anamanya Publishers, New Delhi, 228-243.
[25] Pati, P.K., Rath, S.P., Sharma, M., Sood, A. and Ahuja, P.S. (2006) In Vitro Propagation of Rose—A Review. Biotechnology Advances, 24, 94-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.07.001
[26] Joshee, N., Mutua, M., Zee, F. and Yadav, A.K. (2004) In Vitro Shoot Bud Induction and Plantlet Regeneration in Guava as Influenced by Genotype. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 632, 279-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2004.632.36
[27] Bairu, M.W., Aremu, A.O. and Van Staden, J. (2011) Somaclonal Variation in Plants: Causes and Detection Methods. Plant Growth Regulation, 63, 147-173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x
[28] Miguel, C. and Marum, L. (2011) An Epigenetic View of Plant Cell Cultured in Vitro: Somaclonal Variation and Beyond. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3713-3725.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err155
[29] Wang, Q.-M. and Wang, L. (2012) An Evolutionary View of Plant Tissue Culture: Somaclonal Variation and Selection. Plant Cell Reports, 31, 1535-1547.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1281-5

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.