Share This Article:

Paper-Based Affect Misattribution Procedure for Implicit Measurement

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:410KB) PP. 1531-1538
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.612149    3,814 Downloads   4,448 Views   Citations


The Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) (Payne et al., 2005) can measure implicit attitudes based on a conceptually different procedure from the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (Greenwald et al., 1998). We aim to improve the administrative advantage of the AMP by converting it into a paper-based performance test so that it can collect massive data easily without using a computer for each examinee. We conduct three Paper-based AMP experiments to achieve the typical AMP results with large effect sizes (Study 1), obtain sufficient reliability by the test-retest method (Study 2), and find a similar phenomenon of the disappearance of misattribution when participants evaluate the primes consciously prior to the target evaluation (Study 3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Mori, K. and Uchida, A. (2015) Paper-Based Affect Misattribution Procedure for Implicit Measurement. Psychology, 6, 1531-1538. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.612149.


[1] Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). A Comparative Investigation of Seven Indirect Attitude Measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 668-688.
[2] Blaison, C., Imhoff, R., Hühnel, I., Hess, U., & Banse, R. (2012). The Affect Misattribution Procedure: Hot or Not? Emotion, 12, 403-412.
[3] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[4] De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit Measures: A Normative Analysis and Review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368.
[5] Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in Automatic Activation as an Unobtrusive Measure of Racial Attitudes: A Bona Fide Pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
[6] Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
[7] Lemm, K. M., Lane, K. A., Sattler, D. N., Khan, S. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Assessing Implicit Cognitions with a Paper-Format Implicit Association Test. In M. A. Morrison, & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Psychology of Modern Prejudice (pp. 121-146). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
[8] Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social Influence Effects on Automatic Racial Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842-855.
[9] Mori, H., & Mori, K. (2013). An Implicit Assessment of the Effect of Artificial Cheek Raising: When Your Face Smiles the World Looks Nicer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116, 466-471.
[10] Mori, K., & Mori, H. (2010). Examination of the Passive Facial Feedback Hypothesis Using an Implicit Measure: With a Furrowed Brow, Neutral Objects with Pleasant Primes Look less Appealing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111, 785-789.
[11] Mori, K., Uchida, A., & Imada, R. (2008). A Paper-Format Group Performance Test for Measuring the Implicit Association of Target Concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 545-555.
[12] Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming with Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
[13] Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior (pp. 265-292). New York: Psychology Press.
[14] Oikawa, M., Aarts, H., & Oikawa, H. (2011). There Is a Fire Burning in My Heart: The Role of Emotional Expression in Affective Priming Effects. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 156-163.
[15] Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An Inkblot for Attitude: Affect Misattribution as Implicit Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
[16] Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of Implicit Anti-Fat Bias: The Impact of Providing Causal Information and Evoking Empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68-78.
[17] Vargas, P. T., Sekaquaptewa, D., & von Hippel, W. (2007). Armed Only with Paper and Pencil: “Low-Tech” Measures of Implicit Attitudes. In B. Wittenbrink, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit Measures of Attitudes (pp. 123-124). New York: Guilford Press.
[18] Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for Racial Prejudice at the Implicit Level and Its Relationship with Questionnaire Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.