Share This Article:

Deindustrialization, Class, and Adolescents: Changing Gender Attitudes in Middletown

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:76KB) PP. 114-120
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2011.13014    4,926 Downloads   9,112 Views   Citations


Scholars have become increasingly interested in the role that economic change plays in the processes of self and collective identification. Previous studies show that the process of deindustrialization in the United States had specific consequences for individuals with a “working class” labor force identity, particularly in regard to in-creased financial stability. Using the High School Surveys from Middletown III and IV, collected from local high school students in Muncie, Indiana in 1977, 1989, and 1999, we examine how local adolescents’ expecta-tions regarding school and gender were affected by deindustrialization. In this study, we put forth the following hypotheses: 1) the educational aspirations of adolescents will increase over time, 2) attitudes about gender roles will become less traditional over time, and 3) students will show a greater recognition of the utility of college education over time. Finding support for all hypotheses indicates that adolescent attitudes about education and gender are significantly affected by deindustrialization in the hypothesized direction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Winters, L. , Rushing, W. , Levin, M. & Blanchard, T. (2011). Deindustrialization, Class, and Adolescents: Changing Gender Attitudes in Middletown. Sociology Mind, 1, 114-120. doi: 10.4236/sm.2011.13014.


[1] Adkins, L. (2001). Cultural feminization: “Money, sex and power” for women. Signs, 26, 669-695. doi:10.1086/495625
[2] Bettis, P. (1996). Urban students, liminality, and the postindustrial context. Sociology of Education, 69, 105-125. doi:10.2307/2112801
[3] Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982). The de-industrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
[4] Caccamo, R. (2000). Back to middletown: Three generations of sociological reflections. Palo Alto, California: Standford University Press.
[5] Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
[6] Caplow, C., Bahr, H. M., & Call, V. R. A. (2004). The middletown replications: 75 years of change in adolescent attitudes, 1924-1999. Public Opin-ion Quarterly, 68, 287-313. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh016
[7] Davis, S., & Pearce, L. (2007). Adolescent work-family gender ideolo-gies and educational expectations. Sociological Perspectives, 50, 249-271. doi:10.1525/sop.2007.50.2.249
[8] Epstein, C. F. (1992). Tinkerbells and pinups: The construction and reconstruc-tion of gender boundaries at work. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 232-256). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
[9] Hoover, D. W. (1990). Middletown re-visited. Ball State monograph number thirty-four. Muncie, Indi-ana: Ball State University.
[10] McKibben, J. N. (1987). Job gains versus wage gains—Indiana’s deindustrialization continues. Indiana Business Review, 62, 5-7.
[11] Morton, M. J. (1990). Indiana a century ago: Comparing 1890 to 1988. Indiana Busi-ness Review, 65, 1-6.
[12] Lamont, M. & Fournier, M. (1992). Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
[13] Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Camridge, MA: Harvard University Press, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[14] Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of So-ciology, 28, 167-95. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
[15] Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in transition. New York: Har-court, Brace & World, Inc.
[16] Lynd, Robert S. & Lynd, Helen M. (1929). Middletown: A study in American culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
[17] McDowell, L. (1991). Life without father and Ford: The New gender order of Post-Fordism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 16, 400-419.
[18] McCall, L. (1988). Complex inequality: Gen-der, class, and race in the new economy. New York: Routledge.
[19] Roediger, D. R. et al. (1991). The wages of whiteness: Race and the making of the American working class. Memphis, TN: Verso.
[20] Silvestri, G., & Lukasiewicz, J. (1989). Projections of Occupational Employment, 1988-2000. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 42-65.
[21] Somers, M. (1994). Reclaiming the epistemological “Other”: Narrative and the social constitution of identity. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social theory and the politics of identity (pp. 37-99). Cambridge, MA: Black-well.
[22] Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge.
[23] Weis, L. (2004). Class reunion: The remaking of the American white working class. New York: Routledge.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.