Share This Article:

The Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Secondary School Teachers’ Contextual Performance Structure in Mainland China

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:425KB) PP. 1077-1085
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.69105    2,241 Downloads   2,589 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The contextual performance has drawn much attention from some growing study bodies, and western researchers have proposed the dimensions of it. However, few empirical researches have been conducted on this topic in mainland China. This study explored the structure and developed the scale of Chinese secondary school teachers’ contextual performance. The results indicate that the scale contains four dimensions in Chinese context, which are Occupational Morality, Self-development, Harmonious Cooperation, and Organizational Identification. The study shows that the four dimensions in Chinese context are different from those of western researches.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Hu, Z. , Jiang, Y. and Li, Q. (2015) The Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Secondary School Teachers’ Contextual Performance Structure in Mainland China. Psychology, 6, 1077-1085. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.69105.

References

[1] Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. In: N. Schmitt, & W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
[2] Cai, Y. H. (2002). Teacher’s Job Performance: The Construction and Influence Factors Research. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
[3] Coleman, V. I. (2000). Investigation of the Underlying Structure of the Contextual Performance Domain. The Science and Engineering, 58, 4499.
[4] Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing Contextual Performance from Task Performance for Managerial Jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3
[5] Fan, J. L. (1997). Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society Administrative. Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444.
[6] Johnson, J. W. (2001). The Relative Importance of Task and Contextual Performance Dimension to Supervisor Judgments of Overall Performance. Journal of Applied Psychological, 86, 984-996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984
[7] LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and Cooperative Behavior as Contrasting Forms of Contextual Performance: Evidence of Differential Relationships with Big Five Personality Characteristics and Cognitive Ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326-336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326
[8] Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal Facilitation and Job Dedication as Separate Facets of Contextual Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525
[9] Wang, M. H. (2006). The Study of Content and Structure of Employees’ Organizational Socialization and Its Relationships with Other Related Variables. Doctorial Dissertation, Guangzhou: Jinan University.
[10] Zhou, Z. H., & Wang, E. P. (1999). The Criterion Study of Personnel Psychology. Journal of Developments in Psychology, 7, 53-57.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.