Share This Article:

Language Learner Autonomy and Learning Contract: A Case Study of Language Majors of a University in Hong Kong

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:491KB) PP. 147-180
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2015.52013    5,546 Downloads   7,048 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

With the aim of developing first year undergraduate students’ awareness and ability of autonomous learning, they were asked to do self-access work in an academic English proficiency course through drafting a learning contract outlining their learning objectives and submitting learning evidence regularly in the course of the semester. This study examines the content of the learning contract and the English language learning beliefs reflected from the learning objectives formulated, plus questionnaire results, and determines whether university students in Hong Kong are ready for autonomous learning or not. Based on the findings, the study examines whether Hong Kong university students are ready for autonomous learning, and discusses ways to deal with the challenges which might impede implementation of language learner autonomy in Hong Kong.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Chan, M. (2015) Language Learner Autonomy and Learning Contract: A Case Study of Language Majors of a University in Hong Kong. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 147-180. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2015.52013.

References

[1] Banya, K., & Cheng, M. H. (1997). Beliefs about Foreign Language Learning—A Study of Beliefs of Teachers’ and Students’ Cross Cultural Settings. 31st Annual Meeting of the Teachers of Speakers of Other Languages, Florida.
[2] Benson, P. (2000). “Autonomy as a Learners’ and Teacher’s Right”. In B. Sinclair, I. Mcgrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: New Directions (pp. 111-117). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
[3] Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. New York, NY: Longman/Pearson Education.
[4] Borg, S. (2011). Language Teacher Education. In J. Simpson (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 215-228). London: Routledge.
[5] Breen, M. P., & Mann, S. J. (1997). Shooting Arrows at the Sun: Perspectives on a Pedagogy for Autonomy’ in Benson and Voller. In P. Benson, & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 132-149). London: Longman.
[6] Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[7] Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for Autonomy: Investigating Learner Beliefs. System, 23, 195-205.
[8] Cotterall, S. (1999). Key Variables in Language Learning: What Do Learners Believe about Them? System, 27, 493-513.
[9] Davies, A. (2003). Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs Regarding Aspects of Language Learning. Evaluation and Research in Education, 17, 207-222.
[10] Educational Bureau (EDB) (2013). The Use of Self-Evaluation in Promoting Good Practice within the Scheme.
[11] Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Ellis, N. C. (2008). The Dynamics of Second Language Emergence: Cycles of Language Use, Language Change, and Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 232-249.
[13] Eslami-Rasekh, Z., & Valizadeh, K. (2004). Classroom Activities Viewed from Different Perspectives: Learners’ Voice vs. Teachers’ Voice. TESL EJ, 8, 1-13.
http://tesl-ej.org/ej31/a2.html
[14] Gui, D. A., & Northen, A. (2013). Supplementing self-access learning for an English Language Centre through virtual platforms.’ Retrieved from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/at-the-interface/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/DeanGui_dpaper_elvw3.pdf
[15] Hawkey, T. (2006). Teacher and Learner Perception of Language Learning Activity. ELT Journal, 60, 242-252.
[16] Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press. (First Published 1979, Council of Europe).
[17] Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The Beliefs about Language Learning of Beginning University Foreign Language Students. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 283-294.
[18] Kern, R. G. (1995). Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs about Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71-92.
[19] Littlewood, W. (1991). Curriculum Design. In R. Bowers, & C. J. Brumfit (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching (pp. 11-22). London: Macmillan & The British Council.
[20] Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and Developing Autonomy in East Asian Contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20, 71-94.
[21] Miller, L., Hopkins, M., & Tsang, E. (2007). Establishing a Self-Access Centre in a Secondary School. English Language Teaching Journal, 61, 220-227.
[22] Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and Adapting Materials to Encourage Learner Autonomy. In P. Benson, & P. Voller (Eds.). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.
[23] Oslund, J., Kolb, D., Rubin, I., & Turner, M. (2001). Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[24] Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
[25] Peacock, M. (1999). Beliefs about Language Learning and Their Relationship to Proficiency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 247-263.
[26] Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
[27] Rubin, J. (1981). Study of Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 117-123.
[28] Rubin, J., & Thompson, I. (1982). How to Be a More Successful Language Learner. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
[29] Siebert, D. C., Wilke, D. J., Delva, J., Smith, M. P., & Howell, R. L. (2003). Differences in African American and White College Students’ Drinking Behaviors: Consequences, Harm Reduction Strategies, and Health Information Sources. Journal of American College Health, 52, 123-129.
[30] Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[31] Yang, N. D. (1999). The Relationship between EFL Learners’ Beliefs and Learning Strategy Use. System, 27, 515-535.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.