Share This Article:

Economic Benefit Estimating of Polydimensional Efficiency Measurement Model Implementation

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:335KB) PP. 108-114
DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2015.53011    1,949 Downloads   2,449 Views  

ABSTRACT

This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled “The static and dynamic criteria of building an investment asset portfolio” presented at International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE, 2014), Chania, 3-5 July 2014 and published at Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 14, Pages 575-584 (2014) [1]. At the previous research, it showed the significance to go beyond the scope of selecting one or another metric of static efficiency. And the attention was paid to the dynamic efficiency criteria. The ICOAE 2015 research gives brief results of that work, which is only one of applied areas of polydimensional efficiency measurement model (PEMM). Research work on PEMM conceptual and methodical elaboration has been started in the author’s dissertation study [2] and continued in the practical activity and materialized in Innovative LLC (limited liability company) creating project. The research is concentrating on the real economic benefit of 3D PEMM (thee criterial PEMM version) implementation. In the first part of ICOAE 2015 empirical study, the dynamic component of 3D PEMM on the industrial level was tested. Next, the company economic profit changes and dynamic-market 3D PEMM components correlation was estimated. Finally, the economic benefit of 3D PEMM functional operationalization in the framework of management systems development was calculated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Shishkin, A. and Tyugai, O. (2015) Economic Benefit Estimating of Polydimensional Efficiency Measurement Model Implementation. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 108-114. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2015.53011.

References

[1] Shishkin, A. and Tyugai, O. (2014) The Static and Dynamic Criteria of Building an Investment Asset Portfolio. Procedia Economics and Finance, 14, 575-584.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00740-0
[2] Shishkin, A. (2011) Effectiveness Measurement of Industrial Enterprise Value Creation. Dissertation, Saint-Peterburg State University of Economy, St. Petersburg, 206 p.
[3] Ankudinov, A., Gizatullin, A. and Shishkin, A. (2006) Economic Value Added as a Governance Tool: The Case of Emerging Market, In: Reading Book Addressing the International Conference, Management and Technology in the Global Economy: Nurturing Innovation and National Heritage, Global Business and Technology Association, State University of Management, Moscow, 42-98.
[4] Fraker, G.T. (2006) Using Economic Value Added (EVA) to Measure and Improve Bank Performance. Paper Writing Contest RMA-Arizona Chapter.
[5] Byakov, O.A. (2004) Economic Space: A Process Approach. Kuzbassvuzizdat, 189 p.
[6] Shishkin, A. (2009) Value Based Model of Bank Governing Design. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 25, 42-55.
[7] Shishkin, A. (2010) Dynamic Criterion in Estimating of the Efficiency of Industry Companies Value Creation Process. Vestnik KSFEI, 4, 40-44.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.