Morphological Changes and Antioxidant Activity of Stevia rebaudiana under Water Stress

Abstract

Stevia rebaudiana, a herbaceous perennial shrub contains steviol glycosides, as an alternative source of sugar for diabetic patients. Water being an integral part plays a vital role in the maintenance of plant life. Availability of water is one of the limiting factors determining plant distribution and survival in natural ecosystem. The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of tolerance of Stevia plants to water stress. Potted plants of Stevia were subjected to different levels of water regimes (100 ml, 200 ml, 300 ml) per day, whereas control plants were watered daily with about 400 ml water. Plant height, leaf area, electrolyte leakage and antioxidant enzyme activity (peroxidase and catalase) were assayed during the experimental period. All these parameters were severely affected under water stress condition. Stress treatment caused an increase in electrolyte leakage compared to control. Plant height decreased under severe stress condition whereas a sharp increase in antioxidant enzyme activity was observed in stressed plants as compared to untreated control plants. Our experiment emphasizes the importance of proper watering schedule for the cultivation of Stevia as an agricultural crop to meet the challenges for sugar and energy crisis. 

Share and Cite:

Srivastava, S. and Srivastava, M. (2014) Morphological Changes and Antioxidant Activity of Stevia rebaudiana under Water Stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 3417-3422. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.522357.

1. Introduction

Stress is an altered physiological condition caused by factors that tend to disrupt the equilibrium. Plants are frequently exposed to many stresses such as drought and low temperature, salt, flooding and heat, which severely affect plant growth and food productivity. Water, comprising 80% - 90% of the biomass of plants, is the central molecule in all the physiological processes of plants by being the major medium for transporting metabolites and nutrients. Drought is the most severe abiotic stress factor limiting plant growth and crop production (Rohbakhsh, [1] ). Water deficit is considered as a major environmental factor affecting many aspects of plant physiology and biochemistry (Charles et al., [2] ).

The effect of drought stress on growth and development of medicinal and aromatic plants has been less studied. However, the antioxidant defense system is one of major drought defense and adaptive mechanisms in plants (An and Liang, [3] ). Several studies have pointed out that drought-tolerant species increased their antioxidant enzyme activities in response to drought treatment, whereas drought-sensitive species failed to do so (Masoumi et al., [4] ).

Stevia rebaudiana, a non-caloric sweetener (family—Asteraceae) is cultivated for its sweetening compounds (the steviol glycosides). The two main glycosides of Stevia are stevioside (5% - 10% of dry leaves) and rebaudioside-A (2% - 4%). Due to the non-caloric and sweetening properties, stevioside has gained attention with the rise in demand for low-carbohydrate, and low-sugar food alternatives (Kalpana et al., [5] ). Srivastava and Srivastava [6] reported marked alterations in physiology and biochemistry of Stevia plants grown under water stress.

Hence the objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of variable regimes of water on growth performance and antioxidant activity of Stevia.

2. Materials and Methods

Vegetatively propagated Stevia plants were grown in sand and regularly supplied with Hoagland’s nutrient solution every 5th day. 20 days after transplantation, plants were treated with different water levels viz. 100 ml, 200 ml, 300 ml water per day. The unstressed plants were kept as control and supplied with 400 ml water daily.

All the studied parameters were recorded at every ten days interval from day 30 up to day 70. Plant height was measured from the attachment point of root and stem up to the slip of uppermost fully opened leaf. Leaf area was calculated by the formula given by Muller, [7] . The electrolyte leakage was calculated by the formula described by Sullivan and Ross, [8] . The peroxidase activity was determined in the primary leaves by the method of Shannon et al. [9] . The catalase activity was determined in the primary leaves by the method of Chance and Maehly, [10] .

The data presented are means of three replicates and were analysed with two way ANOVA using the minitab statistical package. The least significant difference (LSD) was calculated to verify the significance of difference between the means, Brunning and Kinz, [11] .

3. Result and Discussion

Stevia plants showed greater variability in plant height under different water levels (Figure 1). The well watered plants exhibited maximum growth than stressed plants and the plant height recorded during the experimental period was highest in well watered plants and decreased with decreasing water levels. In mild and moderate stress Stevia plants the plant height was not much reduced as compared to control as the plants were able to tolerate mild and moderate water deficits at the initial growth stage. Water stress greatly suppresses cell expansion and cell growth due to low turgor pressure. Similar results were found in water stressed Citrus plants, Wu et al. [12] and soyabean, Zhang et al. [13] . Alavi-Samani et al. [14] also observed reduced plant height in two species of thyme in response to water deficit conditions. Water stress as a very important limiting factor for plant growth and development affects both elongation and expansion growth, Shao et al. [15] .

Leaf area was greatly influenced under water stress. Leaf area increased with the plant age in all the water levels but it decreased with the severity of stress (Figure 2). Leaf area increased in control plants due to more retention of water in the leaves in spite of increase in electrolyte leakage which generally increase slightly with plant age. Severe stressed plants had minimum leaf area and the control plants had maximum leaf area. Our result is similar to the findings of Barrios et al. [16] and Ghanbari et al. [17] .

From the results it is clear that membrane integrity was not conserved in stressed plants and the electrolyte leakage increased with the severity of stress (Figure 3). Valentovic et al. [18] reported an increase in electrolyte leakage of sensitive maize cultivars under water stress. Electrolyte leakage was correlated to the sensitivity of plants to stressed conditions. The leakage was due to damage to cell membrane which becomes more permeable,

Figure 1. Stevia rebaudiana: plant height at different days of plant growth under different water regimes (LSD = 7.38).

Figure 2. Stevia rebaudiana: leaf area at different days of plant growth under different water regimes (LSD = 5.153).

Figure 3. Stevia rebaudiana: electrolyte leakage at different days of plant growth under different water regimes (LSD = 14.09).

Senaratia and Kirsie [19] . Quan et al. [20] also reported high electrolyte leakage in drought stressed maize plants than in well watered plants.

There was a higher variability in enzyme activities observed in the leaves of well watered and stress plants of Stevia. The POD and CAT activity gradually declined in control plants where an ascending pattern was observed in stress plants with the greatest increase in moderately and mildly stressed plants (Figure 4 and Figure 5) at 30 DAS, accompanied by a gradual decrease in all conditions at 40 and 50 DAS. This result was similar to the observations of Ping et al. [21] . The level of antioxidants and the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as POD and CAT generally increased in plants under stressed conditions and in several cases their activity correlated well with enhanced tolerance, Prasad et al. [22] , Foyer et al. [23] . Mohamed and Samia [24] also observed that drought stress resulted in considerable increase in the activity of GR, SOD and APX in shoots of soybean cv. Giza 22 and 111 as compared with control plants. The antioxidant potential of Stevia plants was high under mild and moderate stress but in severe stress it was low due to the fact that the plants were not able to defend against the extreme conditions of water stress.

Figure 4. Stevia rebaudiana: peroxidase activity at different days of plant growth under different water regimes (LSD = 2549.65).

Figure 5. Stevia rebaudiana: catalase activity at different days of plant growth under different water regimes (LSD = 10309.21).

4. Conclusion

Stevia is susceptible to water stress and that results in severe cell damages and growth reduction. The antioxidative capacity is also suppressed under severe stress. The necessity of carrying out this work was concerned as there is little knowledge of Stevia as an agricultural crop and our further research will highlight the strategy adopted for development of drought resistant Stevia plants which will alleviate the future threats for proper growth of Stevia plants in water deficit areas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Rohbakhsh, H. (2013) Alleviating Adverse Effects of Water Stress on Growth and Yield of Forage Sorghum by Potassium Application. Advances in Environmental Biology, 7, 40-46.
[2] Charles, O., Joly, R. and Simon, J.E. (1994) Effect of Osmotic Stress on the Essential Oil Content and Composition of Peppermint. Phytochemistry, 29, 2837-2840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(90)87087-B
[3] An, Y.Y. and Liang, Z.S. (2013) Drought Tolerance of Periploca sepium during Seed Germination: Antioxidant Defense and Compatible Solutes Accumulation. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35, 959-967.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1139-z
[4] Masoumi, H., Darwish, F., Daneshian, J., Normohammadi, G. and Habibi, D. (2011). Effect of Water Deficit Stress on Seed Yield and Antioxidants Content in Soyabean (Glycine max. L.) Cultivars. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 1209-1218.
[5] Kalpana, M., Anbazhagan, M. and Natarajan, V. (2009) Utilization of Liquid Medium for Rapid Multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Journal of Ecobiotechnology, 1, 016-020.
[6] Srivastava, S. and Srivastava, M. (2014) Influence of Water Stress on Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Medicinal Plant Stevia rebaudiana. Life Sciences Leaflets, 49, 35-43.
[7] Muller, J. (1991) Determining Leaf Surface Area by Means of Linear Measurements in Wheat and Triticale (Brief Report). Archiv Fuchtungsforsch, 21, 121-123.
[8] Sullivan, C.Y. and Ross, W.M. (1979) Selecting for Drought and Heat Resistance in Grain Sorghum. In: Mussell, H. and Staples, R.C., Eds., Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 263-281.
[9] Shannon, L.M., Kay, E. and Lew, J.Y. (1996) Peroxidase Isoenzymes from Horse Radish Roots I. Isolation and Physiological Properties. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 241, 2166-2172.
[10] Chance, B. and Maehly, A.C. (1955) Assay of Catalase and Peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 764-775.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8
[11] Brunning, J.L. and Kintz, B.K. (1977) Computational Handbook of Statistics. Scott, Foresman and Company, USA, 18-116.
[12] Wu, Q.S., Xia, R.X. and Zhou, Y.N. (2008) Improved Soil Structure and Citrus Growth after Inoculation with Three Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Drought Stress. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44, 122-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.10.001
[13] Zhang, M.C., Duan, L.S., Zhai, L.X., Li, J.M., Tian, X.L., Wang, B.M., He, Z.P. and Li, Z.H. (2004) Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Water Deficit Induced Yield Loss in Soybean. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, 26 September-1 October 2004.
[14] Alavi-Samani, S.M., Pirbalouti, A.G., Kachouei, M.A. and Hamedi, B. (2013) The Influence of Reduced Irrigation on Herbage, Essential Oil Yield and Quality of Thymus vulgaris and Thymus daenensis. Journal of Herbal Drugs, 4, 109-113.
[15] Shao, H.B., Chu, Y., Jaleel, C.A. and Zhao, C.X. (2008) Water Deficit Stress Induced Anatomical Changes in Higher Plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331, 215-225.
[16] Barrios, A.N., Hoogenboom, G. and Nesmith, D.S. (2005) Drought Stress and the Distribution of Vegetative and Reproductive Traits of a Bean Cultivar. Scientia Agricola, 62, 18.
[17] Akbar, G.A., Shakiba, M.R., Toorchi, M. and Choukan, R. (2013) Morpho-Physiological Responses of Common Bean Leaf to Water Deficit Stress. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3, 487-492.
[18] Valentovic, P., Luxova, M., Kolarovic, L. and Gasparikova, O. (2006) Effect of Osmotic Stress on Compatible Solutes Content, Membrane Stability and Water Relations in Two Maize Cultivars. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52, 186-191.
[19] Senaratana, T. and Kersi, B.D. (1983) Characterization of Solute Efflux from Dehydration Injured Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) Seeds. Plant Physiology, 72, 911-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.72.4.911
[20] Quan, R., Shang, M., Zhang, H., Zhao, Y. and Zhang, J. (2004) Engineering of Enhanced Glycine Betaine Synthesis Improves Drought Tolerance in Maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2, 477-486.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00093.x
[21] Bai, L.-P., Sui, F.-G., Ge, T.-D., Sun, Z.-H., Lu, Y.-Y. and Zhou, G.-S. (2006) Effect of Soil Drought Stress on Leaf Water Status, Membrane Permeability and Enzymatic Antioxidant System of Maize. Pedosphere, 16, 326-332.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60059-3
[22] Prasad, T.K., Anderson, M.D., Martin, B.A. and Stewart, C.R. (1994) Evidence for Chilling-Induced Oxidative Stress in Maize Seedlings and a Regulatory Role for Hydrogen Peroxide. The Plant Cell, 6, 65-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.6.1.65
[23] Foyer, C.H., Lopez-Delgado, H., Dat, J.F. and Scott, I.M. (1997) Hydrogen Peroxide and Glutathione-Associated Mechanisms of Acclimatory Stress Tolerance and Signalling. Physiologia Plantarum, 100, 241-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04780.x
[24] Ibrahim, M.H. and Akladious, S.A. (2014) Influence of Garlic Extract on Enzymatic and Non Enzymatic Antioxidants in Soybean Plants (Glycine max) Grown under Drought Stress. Life Science Journal, 11, 46-58.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.