Hypothesis of Conservation of Particle Number

Kozo Aoki

.

DOI: 10.4236/ojm.2011.11001                

Abstract

As for several nuclear reactions, the electroweak interaction is simply explained by a law of conservation of particle number. We find that the positron and electron consist of the three fundamental particles, and , respectively. Furthermore, the members of the second and third generations quark composites consist of the first generation quark and the neutrino of fundamental particles. The particle and its anti- particle pair(or neutrino and its antineutrino pair) have to be an energy quantum (or a photon). The minimum Higgs boson (called “God particle”) might be a neutral pion. The fundamental particles are simply up and down quark, neutrino, muon-neutrino, and those anti-particles.

Keywords

Members Of Electron And Positron; Member Of Muon, Members Of W⁺/W^-//Z⁰/B And Higgs Boson, Members Of Second And Third Generations Quark

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ryden, B. (2003) Introduction to Cosmology, 1st edition, Japanese language edition, (Pearson Education, Inc.), Chapter 10.
[2]	M. Gell-Mann, “A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,” Physics Letters Vol 8, 1964, PP. 214-215.
[3]	Zweig, G. (1964) “AN MODEL FOR STRONG INTERACTION SYMMETRY AND ITS BREAKING I,” CERN Reports 8182/TH.401 and “AN MODEL FOR STRONG INTERACTION SYMMETRY AND ITS BREAKING II 8419/TH.412”
[4]	Hamatsu, R. (1990) High Energy Physics of physics lecture course, Tokyo Metropolitan University.
[5]	A. Kernan, W. M. Powell, C. L. Sandler, W.L. Knight, and F. Russell Stannard, “Muonic-Decay Branching Ratio of the Lambda Hyperon,” Phys. Rev. Vol 133, 1964, B1271-B1273.
[6]	Yuksel, H, (2006) “Positron Annihilations at the Galactic Center: Generating More Questions Than Answers,” arXiv:astro-ph/0609139v1.
[7]	W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” J. Phys. G Vol 33, 2006, PP. 1-1232. and 2007 partial update for edition 2008, http://pdg.lbl.gov/
[8]	A. F. Falk, A Lewandowski, A.A. Petrov, “Effects from the charm scale in ,” Phys. Lett. B Vol 505, 2001, PP. 107-112.
[9]	J.-E. Augustin et al., “Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 33, 1974, PP. 1406-1408.
[10]	F. Abe et al., “Identification of top quarks using kinematic variables,” Phys. Rev. D Vol 52, 1995, PP. R2605-R2609.
[11]	P. Igo-Kemenes, “Searches for Higgs bosons at LEP2,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. Vol 24, 1998, PP. 325-335 and Updated October 2005 by P. Igo-Kemenes.
[12]	P.W. Higgs, “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 13, 1964, PP. 508-509.
[13]	T. Nakano et al., “Evidence for a Narrow S = + 1 Baryon Resonance in Photoproduction from the Neutron,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 91, 2003, PP. 012002.
[14]	JLAB News Release, (2005) Pentaquark debate heats up, http://www.jlab.org/divdept/diro/publicaairs/newsreleases/2005/pentaquarks.html
[15]	D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, and A. Soni, “Enhanced CP Violation with Modes and Extraction of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Angle ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 78, 1997, PP. 3257-3260.
[16]	S. Eidelman, et al., “Charm Dalitz Plot Analysis Formalism and Results,” Phys. Lett. B Vol 592, 2004, PP. 1-1109.
[17]	Horii, Y, et al., (2010) First Evidence of the Decay Followed by , http://belle.kek.jp/results/summer10/dk_ads/.