Share This Article:

Effect of Affect Induction Method on Emotional Valence and Arousal

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:346KB) PP. 595-601
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.57070    4,588 Downloads   5,979 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Human functioning is influenced by the affective state. The literature contains several references to the possibility that valence and arousal have separable influences on attention. There are several methods of inducing affective state but the most popular are by music and video clips. The latter are more vivid and stimulate several sensory systems, leading to the hypothesis that a stronger effect will result when using video clips for the induction of affective state. Both methods have been used in many studies in the past but their different contributions have never really been tested. Thus the aim of the present study is to systematically establish or refute the assumption that video clips are the stronger tool for affect induction. In order to test this hypothesis a study was conducted in which 194 subjects participated in four groups. Positive and negative affect conditions were induced by validated music and video clips. The results established the validity of the hypothesis. The results should be applied in cognitive research testing the relations between induced affect and cognitive abilities in order to determine whether the effect is replicated when the cognitive abilities are tested.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lazar, J. & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2014). Effect of Affect Induction Method on Emotional Valence and Arousal. Psychology, 5, 595-601. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.57070.

References

[1] Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). A Multi-Process Account of Startle Modulation during Affective Perception. Psychophysiology, 43, 486-497.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00412.x
[2] Carlson, N. R. (2012). Physiology of Behavior (11th ed.). London: Pearson.
[3] Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). Mood and Mundane: Relations between Daily Life Events and Self-Reported Mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 296-308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.296
[4] Eich, E., Ng, J. T., Macaulay, D. P. A. D., Percy, A. D., & Grebneva, I. (2007). Combining Music with Thought to Change Mood. Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, 124-136.
[5] Eysenck, M. W. (1993). Principles of Cognitive Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[6] Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global versus Local Processing of Visual Information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00406
[7] Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar Expectancy Theory and Weber’s Law in Animal Timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279-325.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279
[8] Gibbon, J. (1991). Origins of Scalar Timing. Learning and Motivation, 22, 3-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(91)90015-Z
[9] Goldstone, S., & Lhamon, W. T. (1974). Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: I. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 63-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.63
[10] Huber, F., Beckmann, S. C., & Herrmann, A. (2004). Means-End Analysis: Does the Affective State Influence Information Processing Style? Psychology & Marketing, 21, 715-737.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20026
[11] Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2013). Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[12] Nadel, L., & Jacobs, W. J. (1998). Traumatic Memory Is Special. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 154-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10836842
[13] Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Ohman, A. (2000). Fear and Anxiety: Animal Models and Human Cognitive Psychophysiology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 137-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00343-8
[14] Lazar, J. N. (2012). Affect and Attention. Saarbrücken: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
[15] Lazar, J., Kaplan, O., Sternberg, T., & Lubow, R. E. (2012). Positive and Negative Affect Produce Opposing Task-Irrelevant Stimulus Preexposure Effects. Emotion, 12, 591-604.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024867
[16] Shachar, K. (2005). The Link between Self-Control, Social Support and Subjective Wellbeing of Teachers in Miftans. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ramat Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.
[17] Schimmack, U. (2005). Response Latencies of Pleasure and Displeasure Ratings: Further Evidence for Mixed Feelings. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 671-691.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000020
[18] Stone, A. A. (1981). The Association between Perceptions of Daily Experiences and Self- and Spouse-Rated Mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 510-522.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(81)90047-7
[19] Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
[20] Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.