Share This Article:

A Stakeholder-Guided Collaborative Approach to Improve Water Quality in a Nutrient Surplus Watershed

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:331KB) PP. 571-582
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.66056    3,256 Downloads   4,408 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The need for water quality improvement in nutrient surplus watersheds is a pressing issue on the agenda of some government agencies and environmental organizations. Including the water quality perceptions of different affected stakeholder groups in the decision-making process may help in addressing this issue. Unfortunately, there is a lack of published research focusing specifically on understanding how Arkansas stakeholders’ perceptions of water quality issues can be used to build and implement comprehensive and workable water quality management plans. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use a stakeholder-guided collaborative approach to help research and outreach personnel to understand water quality perceptions of key stakeholders and to integrate stakeholder engagement in both the decision-making process and in the implementation of water quality management strategies within the Lincoln Lake Watershed in northwest Arkansas. Two key stakeholder groups (i.e., Locals—residents and agricultural producers—and Outsiders—water quality specialist across the state) were surveyed to assess their perceptions regarding: 1) causes of watershed water quality problems, 2) parties responsible for water quality improvement, 3) effectiveness and affordability of best management practices to reduce water quality degradation, and 4) the stakeholders’ interactions with county, state and federal government. A total of 209 complete surveys (49% response rate) were received. Survey responses were compared to determine if significant differences existed between the two stakeholder groups’ perceptions of water quality performing Fisher’s exact tests. Results from the study showed that water quality is still perceived as an issue in the Lincoln Lake Watershed. Significant differences were found between the two stakeholder groups’ perceptions regarding: 1) different groups’ contributions to water degradation, 2) groups’ responsibilities for cleanup, 3) effectiveness of five best management practices, 4) affordability of four best management practices, and 5) what level of government (i.e., county, state, federal) best represents Locals’ water quality needs and concerns. The lessons learned from this collaborative approach helped identifying Locals’ important knowledge gaps regarding water quality and best management practices effectiveness. Consequently, awareness and education campaigns in conjunction with a stewardship recognition program were conducted to encourage appropriate water conservation strategies within the Lincoln Lake watershed and its adjacent areas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rodriguez, H. , Popp, J. , Gbur, E. and Pennington, J. (2014) A Stakeholder-Guided Collaborative Approach to Improve Water Quality in a Nutrient Surplus Watershed. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 571-582. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.66056.

References

[1] Imperial, M.T. (2005) Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs. Administration & Society, 37, 281-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399705276111
[2] Lubell, M. and Fulton, A. (2008) Local Policy Networks and Agricultural Watershed Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 673-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum031
[3] Osmond, D., Meals, D., Hoag, D., Arabi, M., Luloff, A., Jennings, G. and Line, D. (2012) Improving Conservation Practices Programming to Protect Water Quality in Agricultural Watersheds: Lessons Learned from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture—Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67, 122A-127A. http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.122A
[4] Savage, J. and Ribaudo, M.O. (2013) Impact of Environmental Policies on the Adoption of Manure Management Practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 143-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.039
[5] Scheberle, D. (2004) Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC.
[6] Grimble, R. and Wellard, K. (1997) Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55, 173-193.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
[7] Ravnborg, H.M. and Westermann, O. (2002) Understanding Interdependencies: Stakeholder Identification and Negotiation for Collective Natural Resource Management. Agricultural Systems, 73, 41-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00099-3
[8] Mostashari, A. and Sussman, J. (2005) Stakeholder-Assisted Modeling and Policy Design Process for Environmental Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 7, 355-386.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333205002110
[9] Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Henriksen, H.J. and van der Keur, P. (2011) More Is Not Always Better: Coping with Ambiguity in Natural Resources Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 78-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.029
[10] Barnes, A.P., Willock, J., Hall, C. and Toma, L. (2009) Farmer Perspectives and Practices Regarding Water Pollution Control Programmes in Scotland. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1715-1722.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.002
[11] Barnes, A.P., Willock, J., Toma, L. and Hall, C. (2011) Utilising a Farmer Typology to Understand Farmer Behaviour towards Water Quality Management: Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 477-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.515880
[12] Borisova, T., Racevskis, L. and Kipp, J. (2012) Stakeholder Analysis of a Collaborative Watershed Management Process: A Florida Case Study. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48, 277-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00615.x
[13] Kay, P., Grayson, R., Phillips, M., Stanley, K., Dodsworth, A., Hanson, A., Walker, A., Foulger, M., McDonnell, I. and Taylor, S. (2012) The Effectiveness of Agricultural Stewardship for Improving Water Quality at the Catchment Scale: Experiences from an NVZ and ECSFDI Watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 422-423, 10-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.005
[14] Williams, J.R., Smith, C.M., Roe, J.D., Leatherman, J.C. and Wilson, R.M. (2012) Engaging Watershed Stakeholders for Cost-Effective Environmental Management Planning with “Watershed Manager.” Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 41, 44-53.
[15] Popp, J., Rodríguez, H.G., Gbur, E. and Pennington, J. (2007) The Role of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Addressing Water Quality Disputes in an Embattled Watershed. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Restoration, 3, 255-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4029/2007jemrest3no125
[16] Sang, N. (2008) Informing Common Pool Resource Problems: A Survey of Preference for Catchment Management Strategies amongst Farmers and the General Public in the Ythan River Catchment. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1161-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.014
[17] Riley, T. and Barr, L. (2008) Partners in Protecting Arkansas’ Water Bodies. University of Arkansas, Little Rock.
[18] Hoag, D.L.K., Chaubey, I., Popp, J., Gitau, M., Chang, L., Pennington, J., Rodríguez, H.G., Gbur, E., Nelson, M. and Sharpley, A.N. (2012) Lincoln Lake Watershed, Arkansas: National Institute of Food and Agriculture—Conservation Effects Assessment Project. In: Osmond, D.L., Meals, D.W., Hoag, D.L.K. and Arabi, M., Eds., How to Build Better Agricultural Conservation Programs to Protect Water Quality, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, 171-200.
[19] Chiang, L., Chaubey, I., Gitau, M. and Arnold, J.G. (2010) Differentiating Impacts of Land Use Changes from Pasture Management in a CEAP Watershed Using the SWAT Model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 53, 1569-1584.
[20] Chaubey, I., Chiang, L., Gitau, M. and Mohamed, S. (2010) Effectiveness of BMPs in Improving Water Quality in a Pasture Dominated Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65, 424-437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.424
[21] Gitau, M., Chaubey, I., Gbur, E., Pennington, J. and Gorham, B. (2010) Impact of Land Use Change and BMP Implementation on Water Quality in a Pastured Northwest Arkansas Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65, 353-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.353
[22] Vendrell, P.F., Steele, K.F., Nelson, M.A. and Cash, W.L. (2000) Extended Water Quality Monitoring of the Lincoln Lake Watershed. Arkansas Water Resources Center Report MSC-296, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
[23] Nelson, M.A., Cash, L.W. and Trost, G.K. (2004) Water Quality Monitoring of Moores Creek above Lincoln Lake 2003. Arkansas Water Resources Center Report MSC-319, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
[24] Bailey, B.W., Haggard, B.E. and Massey, L.B. (2012) Water Quality Trends across Select 319 Monitoring Sites in Northwest Arkansas. Arkansas Water Resources Center Report MSC-365, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.