Share This Article:

Corn Growth Response to Elevated CO2 Varies with the Amount of Nitrogen Applied

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:928KB) PP. 306-312
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2014.53042    3,945 Downloads   5,812 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment


Corn, with C4 photosynthetic metabolism, often has no photosynthetic or yield response to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. In C3 species, the yield stimulation at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations often decreases with nitrogen limitation. I tested whether such a nitrogen interaction occurred in corn, by growing sweet corn in field plots in open top chambers at ambient and elevated (ambient + 180 mmol·mol-1) carbon dioxide concentrations for four seasons, with six nitrogen application rates, ranging from half to twice the locally recommended rate. At the recommended rate of nitrogen application, no carbon dioxide effect on production occurred. However, both ear and leaf plus stem biomass were lower for the elevated carbon dioxide treatment than for the ambient treatment at less than the recommended rate of nitrogen application, and higher at the highest rates of nitrogen application. There were no significant responses of mid-day leaf gas exchange rates to nitrogen application rate for either carbon dioxide treatment, and elevated carbon dioxide did not significantly increase leaf carbon dioxide assimilation rates at any nitrogen level. Leaf area index during vegetative growth increased more with nitrogen application rate at elevated than at ambient carbon dioxide. It is concluded that elevated carbon dioxide increased the responsiveness of corn growth to nitrogen application by increasing the response of leaf area to nitrogen application rate, and that elevated carbon dioxide increased the amount of nitrogen required to achieve maximum yields.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

J. Bunce, "Corn Growth Response to Elevated CO2 Varies with the Amount of Nitrogen Applied," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2014, pp. 306-312. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.53042.


[1] [1] D. R. Taub and X. Wang, “Why Are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses,” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, Vol. 50, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1365-1374.
[2] S. K. Aben, S. P. Seneweera, O. Ghannoum and J. P. Conroy, “Nitrogen Requirements for Maximum Growth and Photosynthesis of Rice, Oryza sativa L. cv. Jarrah Grown at 36 and 70 Pa CO2,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 26, No. 8, 1999, pp. 759-766.
[3] G. S. Rogers, L. Payne, P. Milham and J. Conroy, “Nitrogen and Phosphorus Requirements of Cotton and Wheat under Changing Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations,” Plant and Soil, Vol. 155-156, No. 1, 1993, pp. 231-234.
[4] O. Ghannoum and J. P Conroy, “Nitrogen Deficiency Precludes a Growth Response to CO2 Enrichment in C3 and C4 Panicum Grasses,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1998, pp. 627-636.
[5] H. Harmens, C. M. Stirling, C. Marshall and J. F. Farrar, “Does Down-Regulation of Photosynthetic Capacity by Elevated CO2 Depend on N Supply in Dactylis glomerata?” Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2000, pp. 43-50.
[6] H. Y. Kim, M. Lieffering, K. Kobayashi, M. Okada, M. W. Mitchell and M. Gumpertz, “Effects of Free-Air CO2 Enrichment and Nitrogen Supply on the Yield of Temperate Paddy Rice Crops,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 83, No. 3, 2003, pp. 261-270.
[7] L. H. Ziska, W. Weerakoon, O. S. Namuco and R. Pamplona, “The Influence of Nitrogen on the Elevated CO2 Response in Field-Grown Rice,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1996, pp. 45-52.
[8] M. Stitt and A. Krapp, “The Interaction between Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Nutrition: The Physiological and Molecular Background,” Plant, Cell and Environment, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1999, pp. 741-621.
[9] E. P. McDonald, J. E. Erickson and E. L. Kruger., “Can Decreased Transpiration Limit Plant Nitrogen Acquisition in Elevated CO2?” Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2002, pp. 1115-1120.
[10] H. Shimono and J. A. Bunce, “Acclimation of Nitrogen Uptake Capacity of Rice to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration,” Annals of Botany, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2009, pp. 87-94.
[11] S.-Y. Kim, R. C. Sicher, H. Bae, D. C. Gitz, J. T. Baker, D. J. Timlin and V. R. Reddy, “Canopy Photosynthesis, Evapotranspiration, Leaf Nitrogen, and Transcription Profiles of Maize in Response to CO2 Enrichment,” Global Change Biology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2006, pp. 588-600.
[12] A. D. B. Leakey, M. Uribelarrea, E. A. Ainsworth, S. L. Naidu, A. Rogers, D. R. Ort and S. P. Long, “Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Yield of Maize Are Not Affected by Open-Air Elevation of CO2 Concentration in the Absence of Drought,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 140, No. 2, 2006, pp. 779-790.
[13] P. V. Vara Prassad, K. J. Boote and L. H. Allen Jr., “Adverse High Temperature Effects on Pollen Viability, Seed-Set, Seed Yield and Harvest Index of Grain-Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moech] Are More Severe at Elevated Carbon Dioxide Due to Higher Tissue Temperatures,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 139, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 237-251.
[14] J. A. Bunce, “What Is the Usual Internal Carbon Dioxide Concentration in C4 Species under Midday Field Conditions?” Photosynthetica, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2005, pp. 603-608.
[15] R. J. C. Markelz, R. S. Strellner and A. D. B. Leakey, “Impairment of C4 Photosynthesis by Drought Is Exacerbated by Limiting Nitrogen and Ameliorated by Elevated [CO2] in Maize,” Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 62, No. 9, 2011, pp. 3235-3246.
[16] R. Manderscheid, M. Erbs and H.-J. Weigel, “Interactive Effects of Free-Air CO2 Enrichment and Drought Stress on Maize Growth,” European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 43, 2012, pp. 97-107.
[17] D. J. Watson, “The Physiological Basis of Variation in Yield,” Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 4, 1952, pp. 101-145.
[18] H. H. Rogers, G. E. Bingham, J. D. Cure, J. M. Smith and K. A. Surano, “Responses of Selected Plant Species to Elevated Carbon Dioxide in the Field,” Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1983, pp. 569-574.
[19] A. D. B. Leaky, C. J. Bernacchi, F. G. Dohleman, D. R. Ort and S. P. Long, “Will Photosynthesis of Maize (Zea mays) in the US Corn Belt Increase in Future [CO2] Rich Atmosphere? An Analysis of Diurnal Courses of CO2 Uptake under Free-Air Concentration Enrichment (FACE),” Global Change Biology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2004, pp. 951-962.
[20] J. S. Boyer, “Leaf Enlargement and Metabolic Rates in Corn, Soybean, and Sunflower at Various Leaf Water Potentials,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1970, pp. 233-235.
[21] Y. Assefa, K. L. Roozenboom, S. A. Staggenborg and J. Du, “Dryland and Irrigated Corn Yield with Climate, Management, and Hybrid Changes from 1939 through 2009,” Agronomy Journal, Vol. 104, No. 2, 2012, pp. 473-482.
[22] E. P. Wilhelm, R. E. Mullen, P. L. Keeling and G. W. Singletary, “Heat Stress during Grain Filling in Maize: Effect on Kernel Growth and Metabolism,” Crop Science, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1733-1741.
[23] USDA Economics, “Statistics and Market Information System,” 2013.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.