Share This Article:

Powder River Basin Coal: Powering America

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:2962KB) PP. 514-533
DOI: 10.4236/nr.2013.48063    4,626 Downloads   6,095 Views   Citations


Powder River Basin (PRB) coal in Wyoming and Montana is used to produce 18 percent of the electricity consumed in the United States. Coal production from the PRB more than doubled between 1994 and 2009. PRB coal companies produced greater amounts of coal at declining real prices over much of this period through investment in equipment and production systems that achieved massive economies of scale. The bulk of PRB coal is shipped to the middle part of America from Texas in the south to Michigan in the north and New York in the east. States that consume significant amounts of PRB coal have electricity rates well below the national average. The largest industrial users of electricity are in these regions. Replacing PRB coal would require almost 5.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas per year, representing a 26 percent increase in demand. Such an increase in gas consumption would increase prices for natural gas by roughly 76 percent. In such a world, U.S. energy users would pay $107 billion more each year for electricity and natural gas. Hence, by using PRB coal, the U.S. economy avoids $107 billion per year in higher energy costs. Estimates reported in the literature indicate that the gross environmental damages from PRB coal production are $27 billion. Hence, the net social benefits of PRB coal are $80 billion per year. Given the large size and low cost of these reserves, PRB coal will likely supply societal energy needs well into the future as long as the public and their elected officials are willing to accept the environmental impacts in return for the substantial economic benefits from using PRB coal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

T. Considine, "Powder River Basin Coal: Powering America," Natural Resources, Vol. 4 No. 8, 2013, pp. 514-533. doi: 10.4236/nr.2013.48063.


[1] R. Ayers and B. Warr, “The Economic Growth Engine: How Energy and Work Drive Material Prosperity,” Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2009.
[2] British Petroleum, “Statistical Review of World Energy,” 2013.
[3] S. Gerking and S. Hamilton, “What Explains the Increased Utilization of Powder River Basin Coal in Electric Power Generation?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2008, pp. 933-950.
[4] M. Busse, and N. Keohane, “Market Effects of Environmental Regulation: Coal, Railroads, and the 1990 Clean Air Act,” Rand Journal of Economics, 2007, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 1159-1179.
[5] D. Barnes and W. Floor, “Rural Energy in Developing Countries: A Challenge for Economic Development,” Annual Review of Energy and Environment, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1996, pp. 497-530.
[6] T. Gutowski, S. Sahni, J. Allwood, M. Ashby and E. Worrell, “The Energy Required to Produce Materials: Constraints on Energy-Intensity Improvements, Parameters of Demand,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol. 371, No. 1986, 2013, pp. 1-14.
[7] T. Considine, “Economic and Technological Determinants of the Material Intensity of Use,” Land Economics, Vol. 67, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99-115.
[8] J. Van Den Bergh and M. Janssen, “Economics on Industrial Ecology: Materials, Structural Change, and Spatial Scales,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2004.
[9] Office of Technology Assessment, “Energy in Developing Countries,” Report OTA-E-486, 1991.
[10] Office of Technology Assessment, “Fueling Development: Energy Technologies for Developing Countries,” Report OTA-E-516, 1992.
[11] World Bank, “World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development,” 1994.
[12] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “U.S. EnergyRelated Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” 2012.
[13] S. H. Schurr, “Energy Use, Technological Change, and Productive Efficiency: An Economic-Historical Interpretation,” Annual Review of Energy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1984, pp. 409-425.
[14] D. W. Jorgenson, “Energy Prices and Productivity Growth,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1981, pp. 165-179.
[15] D. W. Jorgenson, “The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth,” The Energy Journal, 1984, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 11-26.
[16] J. Luppens, D. Scott, J. Haacke, L. Osmonson, T. Rohrbacher and M. Ellis, “Assessment of Coal Geology, Resources, and Reserves in the Gillette Coalfield Powder River Basin Wyoming,”2012
[17] J. Boyd and Company, “Powder River Basin Coal Resource and Cost Study,” 2011.
[18] S. Limerick, “Coalbed Methane in the United States: A GIS Study,” 2013.
[19] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Coal Production by State, County, and Mine Type,” 2013.
[20] C. Carlson, D. Burtraw, M. Cropper and K. Palmer, “Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What are the Gains from Trade?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108, No. 3, 2000, pp. 1292-1326.
[21] T. Considine and D. Larson, “The Environment as a Factor of Production,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2006, pp. 645-662.
[22] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Coal Mining Productivity & Employees by State and Mine Type,” 2013.
[23] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Rail Coal Transportation Rates to the Electric Power Sector,” 2013.
[24] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 7.9 Coal Prices, Selected Years, 1949-2011,” Annual Energy Review, 2013.
[25] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 7.2 Coal Production, 1949-2011,” Annual Energy Review, 2013.
[26] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 9.1 Emissions from Energy Consumption at Conventional Power Plants and Combined Heat-and-Power Plants, 2011 through 2011.”
[27] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 26. U.S. Coal Consumption by End Use Sector, by Census Division and State,” 2013.
[28] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Form EIA-923 Detailed Data,” 2013.
[29] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 5.6.B. Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector by State,
[30] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 2.8 Retail Sales of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by EndUse Sector, by State, 2011 and 2010,” Electric Power Annual, 2013.
[31] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 2.10 Average Retail Price for Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, by State, 2011 and 2010,” Electric Power Annual, 2013,
[32] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Natural gas Prices,” 2013,
[33] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 2.10 Average Retail Price for Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, by State, 2011 and 2010,” Electric Power Annual, 2013.
[34] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Table 9.10. Cost of Fossil-Fuel Receipts at Electric Generating Plants,” Monthly Energy Review, 2013.
[35] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Producer Prices Less Food and Energy,” 2013.
[36] Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2013, Reference Case.
[37] N. Muller, R. Mendelsohn and W. Nordhaus, “Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy,” American Economic Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2011, pp. 1649-1675.
[38] U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Annual Energy Outlook,” 2012.®ion=3-0&cases=heur12-d022212a,leur12-d022212a,lm2012-d022412a,hm2012-d022412a,ref2012-d020112c
[39] N. Pham and D. Ikenson, “A Critical Review of the Benefits and Costs of EPA Regulations on the U.S. Economy,” National Economic Research Associates, 2012, 38 p.
[40] P. Glaser, “Four More Years: What to Expect from EPA on Coal Issues in the Second Term,” Troutman and Sanders, School of Energy Resources, Coal Industry Round Table, Gillette, 2012.
[41] L. Pratson, D. Haerer and D. Patino-Escheverri, “Fuel Prices, Emission Standards, and Generation Costs for Coal vs Natural Gas Power Plants,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 9, 2013, pp. 49264933.
[42] G. Schaefer, “U.S. Coal Export Potential,” Arch Coal, School of Energy Resources University of Wyoming, Coal Industry Round Table, Gillette, 2012.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.