Share This Article:

Japanese Are Modest Even When They Are Winners: Competence Ratings of Winners and Losers in Social Comparison

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:157KB) PP. 827-830
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.411119    4,010 Downloads   5,628 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Social comparison experiments in two different social conditions, competing between friends and between strangers, were carried out with 88 Japanese male undergraduates. Participants were asked to come to the laboratory in friend pairs to participate in the experiment. Two pairs were randomly combined for each experimental session. In the Between-Friends condition, one of the two pairs solved 20 anagrams competitively while the other pair observed them. In the Between-Strangers condition, one performer and one observer were randomly chosen in each pair and the performers solved anagram tasks competitively. As in our previous study, the anagram tasks were presented utilizing a presentation trick so that one performer-and-observer group viewed easier anagrams than the other group without their noticing the difference. As intended, those who viewed the easier anagrams outperformed the others, becoming winners in all sessions. No participants noticed the trick. After the task, all four participants rated the ability of the two performers including themselves. Their ability ratings showed that they tended to evaluate their own ability modestly. Even winners consistently rated themselves lower than the others rated them. Two possible explanations of why Japanese participants made such modest responses were presented and discussed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Mori, K. & Mori, H. (2013). Japanese Are Modest Even When They Are Winners: Competence Ratings of Winners and Losers in Social Comparison. Psychology, 4, 827-830. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.411119.

References

[1] Alicke, M. D., LoSchiavo, F. M., Zerbst, J., & Zhang, S. (1997). The person who outperforms me is a genius: Maintaining perceived competence in upward social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 781-789.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.781
[2] Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
[3] Lassiter, G. D., Clark, J. K., Munhall, P. J., & Lindberg, M. J. (2008). And I thought I was bad! The Idiot Effect in social judgment. Social Cognition, 26, 347-356.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.347
[4] Lassiter, G. D., & Munhall, P. J. (2001). The Genius Effect: Evidence for a non-motivational interpretation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 349-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1463
[5] Mori, K. (2007). Projecting two words with one machine: A method for presenting two different visual stimuli using just one projector without viewers’ noticing the duality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 811-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192973
[6] Mori, K., & Mori, H. (2011). No confederates needed: Social comparison without collaboration. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 543-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.4.543
[7] Mori, K., Uchida, A., & Imada, R. (2008). A paper-format group performance test for measuring the implicit association of target concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 546-555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.546
[8] Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., & Hart, C. M. (2007). The importance of being modest. In C. Sedikides, & S. Spencer (Eds.), The self: Frontiers in social psychology (pp. 163-184). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
[9] Yamaguchi, S., Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Murakami, F., Chen, D., Shiomura, K., Kobayashi, C., & Cai, H. (2007). Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 18, 498-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01928.x

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.