Share This Article:

Approaching the Direct Object Pronouns: How Much Grammatical Form Is Necessary in Instruction?

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:109KB) PP. 319-329
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2013.34041    4,439 Downloads   6,693 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The main goal of this investigation was to determine if there is a more effective approach among focus on forms, focus on meaning, or focus on form for teaching the direct object pronouns to beginning students of Spanish. It will be beneficial to discover which of these three widely-used approaches can best help students to acquire correct pronoun use, and may aid instructors of Spanish in the teaching of these pronouns. In order to compare these approaches, three sections of a beginning Spanish course received instruction in one of the three approaches. The participants of this study were 51 beginning level students who had had 3 years of Spanish instruction at the high school level and were native speakers of English. The study follows a pretest/posttest design. Results find positive results for form-focused instruction over purely meaning-focused instruction for teaching the Spanish direct object pronouns with regards to sentence completion tasks. A main implication of this study is that focus on meaning instruction is not sufficient to help beginning learners improve their production of Spanish direct object pronouns. While results show a more positive impact for focus on form instruction over the more traditional focus on forms approach, additional research comparing these two methods is suggested. It is also important to note that beginning level learners show overall low levels of accuracy with direct object pronouns in Spanish.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

D’Amico, M. (2013). Approaching the Direct Object Pronouns: How Much Grammatical Form Is Necessary in Instruction?. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 319-329. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.34041.

References

[1] Camps, J. (1997). Attention to form and meaning in second language acquisition: Object clitic pronouns in Spanish. Doctoral Dissertation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
[2] Camps, J. (2003). Concurrent and retrospective verbal reports as tools to better understand the role of attention in second language tasks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 201-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00044
[3] Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588029
[6] Grim, F. (2008). Integrating focus on form in L2 content-enriched instruction lessons. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 321-346.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03295.x
[7] Han, Z. (2002) A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588240
[8] Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. P. R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[9] Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[10] Houston, T. (1997). Sentence processing in Spanish as a second language: A study of word order and background knowledge. In W. R. Glass, & A. T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, vol. 2: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 123-134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
[11] Howatt, A. P. R. (1987). From structural to communicative. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 14-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500000994
[12] Lee, J. (2003). Cognitive and linguistic perspectives on the acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish as a second language. In B. Lafford, & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition state of the science (pp. 98-129). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
[13] Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, l2, 429448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009517
[15] Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[16] Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[17] Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in formfocused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
[18] Omaggio Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context (pp. 116118). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
[19] Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E., & Rad, N. D. (2011). The effect of form versus meaning-focused tasks on the development of collocations among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 4, 180-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p180
[20] Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084494
[21] Rahimpour, M., Salimi, A., & Farrokhi, F. (2012). The effect of intensive and extensive focus on form on EFL learners’ written accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 2277-2283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.11.2277-2283
[22] Saeidi, M., Zaferanieh, E., & Shatery, H. (2012). On the effects of focus on form, focus on meaning, and focus on forms on learners’ vocabulary learning in ESP context. English Language Teaching, 5, 72-79.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p72
[23] Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
[24] Sheen, R. (2005). Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In A. Housen, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 271-310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.271
[25] Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & White, J. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. In A. Housen, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 199-234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.199
[26] Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
[27] Toth, P. (2000). The interaction of instruction and learner-internal factors in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 169-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100002023
[28] VanPatten, B. (1983). Processing strategies in second language acquisition. Doctoral Dissertation, Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
[29] VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67.
[30] VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435-450.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb01179.x
[31] VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
[32] VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979
[33] VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C. (2004) The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction theory, research, and commentary. (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
[34] VanPatten, B., & Houston, T. (1998). Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 53-70.
[35] VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015394
[36] VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milcham, & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.