Share This Article:

Coherency Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Neural Activities in the Molluscan Olfactory Center Applying Extracellular Recording with Wavelet Analysis

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:4553KB) PP. 291-297
DOI: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2013.34035    2,837 Downloads   5,198 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The procerebrum (PC) of the land slug Limax is the olfactory center involved in olfactory discrimination and learning. In the PC, an oscillation of local field potential (LFP) with 0.5 - 1 Hz is observed by electrophysiological extracellular recording. Additionally, spatiotemporal neural activities in the PC have been examined using optical recordings. However, extracellular recording is preferable to measure neural activities for a long time with a high speed, while it is not abundant in spatial information. In this study, we therefore attempted to elicit spatial information from extracellular recording. For this purpose, we evaluated spatial information included in the LFP compared with the spatiotemporal neural activities measured by the fluorescent voltage imaging. As a result, aversive odors induced the coherent spatiotemporal neural activities in the PC, and the increase in coherency was observed as a change in the LFP waveform. It was also evaluated as a decrease in entropy by analyzing the LFP oscillation patterns and wavelet analysis. Thus, although the LFP provides only one series of signals, the coherency of the spatiotemporal neural activities in the PC can be evaluated by applying extracellular recording with wavelet analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Hamasaki, Y. , Shimokawa, T. , Ishida, K. , Komatsuzaki, Y. , Watanabe, S. and Saito, M. (2013) Coherency Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Neural Activities in the Molluscan Olfactory Center Applying Extracellular Recording with Wavelet Analysis. Open Journal of Biophysics, 3, 291-297. doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2013.34035.

References

[1] T. Kimura, H. Suzuki, E. Kono and T. Sekiguchi, “Mapping of Interneurons That Contribute to Food Aversive Conditioning in the Slug Brain,” Learning & Memory, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1998, pp. 376-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.4.5.376
[2] T. Teyke and A. Gelperin, “Olfactory Oscillation Augment Odor Discrimination Not Odor Identification by Limax CNS,” NeuroReport, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1999, pp. 1061- 1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199904060-00030
[3] A. Gelperin and D. W. Tank, “Odour-Modulated Collective Network Oscillations of Olfactory Interneurons in a Terrestrial Mollusk,” Nature, Vol. 345, No. 6274, 1990, pp. 437-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/345437a0
[4] D. Kleinfeld, K. R. Delaney, M. S. Fee, J. A. Flores, D. W. Tank and A. Gelperin, “Dynamics of Propagating Waves in the Olfactory Network of a Terrestrial Mollusk: An Electrical and Optical Study,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1994, pp. 1402-1419.
[5] S. Watanebe, S. Kawahara and Y. Kirino, “Morphological Characterization of the Bursting and Nonbursting Neurons in the Olfactory Centre of the Terrestrial Slug Limax marginatus,” Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 201, No. 7, 1998, pp. 925-930.
[6] S. Watanabe and Y. Kirino, “Selective Calcium Imaging of Olfactory Interneurons in a Land Mollusk,” Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 417, No. 3, 2007, pp. 246-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.083
[7] K. R. Delaney, A. Gelperin, M. S. Fee, J. A. Flores, R. Gervais, D. W. Tank and D. Kleinfeld, “Waves and Stimulus-Modulated Dynamics in an Oscillating Olfactory Network,” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, Vol. 91, No. 2, 1994, pp. 669-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.2.669
[8] S. Inoue, S. Kawahara, S. Toda, S. Watanabe and Y. Kirino, “Selective Optical Recording of the Neural Activity in the Olfactory Center of the Land Slug Using a Calcium Indicator Dye,” Bioimages, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1998, pp. 59- 67.
[9] Y. Hamasaki, M. Hosoi, S. Nakada, T. Shimokawa and M. Saito, “Fluorescent Voltage Imaging Technique for the Measurement of Molluscan Neural Activities,” Open Journal of Biophysics, Vol. 3, No. 1A, 2013, pp. 54-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojbiphy.2013.31A007
[10] R. Q. Quiroga, O. A. Rosso, E. Basar and M. Schürmann, “Wavelet Entropy in Event-Related Potentials: A New Method Shows Ordering of EEG Oscillations,” Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 84, No. 4, 2001, pp. 291-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004220000212
[11] O. A. Rosso, S. Blanco, J. Yordanova, V. Kolev, A. Figlioa, M. Schürmann and E. Basar, “Wavelet Entropy: A New Tool for Analysis of Short Duration Electrical Signals,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 105, No. 1, 2001, pp. 65-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00356-3
[12] A. Schütt, O. A. Rosso and A. Figliola, “A Discovery of New Features of Gastropod Local Field Potentials by Application of Wavelet Tools,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 119, No. 1, 2002, pp. 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00184-X
[13] A. Schütt, I. Ito, O. A. Rosso and A. Figliola, “Wavelet Analysis Can Sensitively Describe Dynamics of Ethanol Evoked Local Field Potentials of the Slug (Limax marginatus) Brain,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 129, No. 2, 2003, pp. 135-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00200-0
[14] I. Daubechies, “Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 41, No. 7, 1988, pp. 909-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160410705
[15] C. E. Shannon, “A Mathematical Theory of Communication Bell System,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1948, pp. 379-423; Vol. 27, No. 4, 1948, pp. 623- 656.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.