Share This Article:

Root zone soil moisture redistribution in maize (Zea mays L.) under different water application regimes

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:954KB) PP. 521-528
DOI: 10.4236/as.2013.410070    4,857 Downloads   7,573 Views  

ABSTRACT

Soil moisture availability to plant roots is very important for crop growth. When soil moisture is not available in the root zone, plants wilt and yield is reduced. Adequate knowledge of the distribution of soil moisture within crop’s root zone and its linkage to the amount of water applied is very important as it assists in optimising the efficient use of water and reducing yield losses. The study aimed at evaluating the spatial redistribution of soil moisture within maize roots zone under different irrigation water application regimes. The study was conducted during two irrigatation seasons of 2012 at Nkango Irrigation Scheme, Malawi. The trials consisted of factorial arrangement in a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD). The factors were water and nitrogen and both were at four levels. The Triscan Sensor was used to measure volumetric soil moisture contents at different vertical and lateral points. The study inferred that the degree of soil moisture loss depends on the amount of water present in the soil. The rate of soil moisture loss in 100% of full water requirement regime (100% FWRR) treatment was higher than that in 40% FWRR treatment. This was particularly noticed when maize leaves were dry. In 100% FWRR treatment, the attraction between water and the surfaces of soil particles was not tight and as such “free” water was lost through evaporation and deep percolation, while in 40% FWRR, water was strongly attracted to and held on the soil particles surfaces and as such its potential of losing water was reduced.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Mthandi, J. , Kahimba, F. , Tarimo, A. , Salim, B. and Lowole, M. (2013) Root zone soil moisture redistribution in maize (Zea mays L.) under different water application regimes. Agricultural Sciences, 4, 521-528. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.410070.

References

[1] Sanaee-Jahromi, S., Feyen, J., Wyseure, G. and Javan, M. (2001) Approach to the evaluation of undependable delivery of water in irrigation schemes. Irrigation and Drainage, 15, 197-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012674714229
[2] Shideed, K., Oweis, T. and Osman, M.E. (2003) Enhancing agricultural productivity through on-farm water-use efficiency: An empirical case study of wheat production in Iraq. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), 12-67.
[3] Saleh, A.F.M. and Mondal, M.S. (2001) Performance evaluation of rubber dam projects of Bangladesh in irrigation development. Irrigation and Drainage, 50, 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ird.18
[4] Pandey, R.K., Maranville, J.W. and Chetima, M.M. (2000) Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agricultural Water Management, 46, 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00074-3
[5] Barker, R., Dawe, D. and Inocencio, A. (2003) Economics of water productivity in managing water for agriculture. In: Kijne, W.J., et al., Eds., Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 19-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996691.0019
[6] Renault, D. and Wallendar, W.W. (2002) Nutritional water productivity and diet: From “crop per drop” towards “nutrition per drop”. Agricultural Water Management, 45, 275-296.
[7] English (1990) Deficit irrigation I: Analytical framework. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116, 399-410.
[8] Lamm, F.R., Rodgers, D.H. and Manges, H.L. (1994) Irrigation scheduling with planned soil water depletion. Transactions of the ASAE, 37, 1491-1497.
[9] Sarwar, A. and Perry, C. (2002) Increasing water productivity through deficit irrigation: Evidence from the Indus Plains of Pakistan. Irrigation and Drainage, 51, 87-92.
[10] Dichio, B., Xiloyannis, C., Nuzzo, V., Montanaro, G. and Palese, A.M. (2004) Regulated deficit irrigation inPeach tree in semi-arid climate. www.biomet.ucdavis.edu
[11] Steduto, P., Raes, D.T., Hsiao, C., Fereres, E., Heng, L., Izzi, G. and Hoogeveen, J. (2008) AquaCrop: A new model for crop prediction under water deficit conditions. Options Méditerranéennes, Series A, No. 80, Rome.
[12] Fasinmirin, J.T. and Oguntuase, A.M. (2008) Soil moisture distribution pattern in Amaranthus cruentus field under drip irrigation system. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 486-493. www.academicjournals.org
[13] Mloza-Banda, H.R. (1994) Principles and practices of crop management. A field study guide. Bunda College of Agriculture, Lilongwe.
[14] Allen, G.R., Pereira, S.L., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998) FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Crop Evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements) (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
[15] Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (2011) Annual reports and notes. Lilongwe.
[16] FOASTAT (2000) Maize. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/cropinfo_maize.html

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.