Share This Article:

An Implementation of the Japanese Autobiographical Method Seikatsu Tsuzurikata—“Life Writing”—In a US Elementary School

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:66KB) PP. 549-556
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.49080    4,116 Downloads   5,641 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This article explores the historical, philosophical, curricular, and practical methods of the Japanese auto-biographical method, “seikatusu tsuzurikata” and its implementation in a US elementary school. Seikatsu tsuzurikata is a progressive form of journaling that “provokes students to ‘objectively’ observe the reality surrounding them in terms of their own senses without any intervention of anyone else’s authority”, by writing essays “reflecting on their social situation” (Asanuma, 1986: pp. 153, 155). Part of life writing’s central philosophy is that students are not required to participate. For students who engaged in life writing, several benefits resulted, according to their teachers. However, we found that students had great difficulty articulating their social and emotional worlds because this kind of reflective work was uncomfortable and foreign to students who were subjected to teacher-driven, “content”, and “standards based” instruction. This article concludes by exploring the possibility of connecting life writing with social-emotional learning (SEL).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Richardson, S. & Konishi, H. (2013). An Implementation of the Japanese Autobiographical Method Seikatsu Tsuzurikata—“Life Writing”—In a US Elementary School. Creative Education, 4, 549-556. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.49080.

References

[1] Asanuma, S. (1986). The autobiographical method in Japanese educa tion: The writing project and its application to social studies. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 151-168). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
[2] Bickel, R., & Maynard, A. S. (2004). Group and interaction effects with “no child left behind”: Gender and reading in a poor, Appalachian district. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12, 1-18.
[3] CASEL (n.d.). What is sel? http://casel.org/why-it-matters/what-is-sel
[4] Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Hei nemann Educational Books, Inc.
[5] Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational ac countability: The irony of “no child” left behind. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10, 245-260. doi:10.1080/13613320701503207
[6] Dougherty, S. (1999). Autobiography: Telling our stories. Montessori LIFE, 11, 40-41.
[7] Gutek, G. (2006). American education in a global society: Interna tional and comparative perspectives (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
[8] Hayashi, A., Karasawa, M., & Tobin, J. (2009). The Japanese pre school’s pedagogy of feelings: Cultural strategies for supporting young children’s emotional development. Ethos, 37, 32-49. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01030.x
[9] Heydt, S. (2004). Dear diary: Don’t be alarmed. I’m a boy. Gifted Child Today, 27, 6-25.
[10] Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2004). The three Cs of promoting social and emotional learning in building academic success on social and emotional learning. In J. Zins, R. Weissberg, M. Wang, & H. Wal berg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say (pp. 40-58)? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
[11] Kitagawa, M., & Kitagawa, C. (1987). Making connections with writing: An expressive writing model in Japanese schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.
[12] Kitagawa, M., & Kitagawa, C. (2007). Core values of progressive edu cation: Seikatsu tsuzurikata and whole language. International Jour nal of Progressive Education, 3, 52-67.
[13] Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press.
[14] Maslow (1970) Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
[15] Maslow (1971) The reaches of human nature. New York, NY: Viking Press.
[16] McCombs, B. (2004). The learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for balancing academic achievement and social-emo tional learning outcomes. In J. Zins, R. Weissberg, M. Wang, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say (pp. 23-39)? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
[17] Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499920
[18] Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory (2nd ed.)? New York, NY: Routledge.
[19] Hello Work Website (2013). Popular professions in Japan.
http://www.13hw.com/jobapps/ranking.html
[20] Rousmaniere, K., Dehli, K., & de Coninkl-Smith, N. (1997). Discipline, moral regulation and schooling. New York, NY: Garland Publishers.
[21] Slifkin, J. (2001). Writing the care of the self: Variances in higher order thinking and narrative topics in high school students' reflective journals. English Leadership Quarterly, 24, 5-11.
[22] Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cul tures revisited. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226805054.001.0001
[23] Wald, M., & Losen, D. (2003). Deconstructing the school to prison pipeline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[24] White, M. (1987). The Japanese educational challenge: A commitment to children. New York, NY: The Free Press.
[25] Zins, J., Bloodworth, M., Weissberg, R., & Walberg, H. (2004). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school suc cess. In J. Zins, R. Weissberg, M. Wang, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say (pp. 3-22)? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.