Share This Article:

Mesocyclone Evolution and Differences between Isolated and Embedded Supercells

DOI: 10.4236/acs.2013.33A001    2,633 Downloads   4,642 Views  

ABSTRACT

A total of 61 supercells with mesocyclones lasting for at least 6 volume scans were investigated. These storm parameters and mesocyclone parameters were counted and compared to determine the salient differences between isolated supercells and embedded supercells in different regions. The results showed that the mesocyclone parameters had different evolution characteristics in three stages of mesocyclone. The storm parameters, mesocyclone parameters and severe weather phenomenon had significantly differences between isolated supercells and embedded supercells. The mesocyclone parameter differences determined the differences in the reflectivity structure and weather phenomenon. The higher base and top of mesocyclone for isolated supercells indicated that the isolated supercells had higher maximum reflectivity, maximum reflectivity height, cell-based vertically integrated liquid and top of storm cell, and significantly higher probability of hail or large hail than the embedded supercells. The descending lower base of mesocyclone at its mature stage in the region of Jianghuai Plain indicated that the supercells in this region had a higher probability of mesocyclone-induced tornado.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

X. Diao, Q. Shi and H. Zhou, "Mesocyclone Evolution and Differences between Isolated and Embedded Supercells," Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, Vol. 3 No. 3A, 2013, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.4236/acs.2013.33A001.

References

[1] K. A. Browning, “Cellular Structure of Convective Storms,” The Meteorological Magazine, Vol. 91, No. 1085, 1962, pp. 341-350.
[2] K. A. Browning, “Airflow and Precipitation Trajectories within Severe Local Storms which Travel to the Right of the Winds,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1964, pp. 634-639. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO;2
[3] B. A. Klimowski, M. R. Hjelmfelt, M. J. Bunkers, D. Sedlacek and L. R. Johnson, “Hailstorm Damage Observed from the GOES-8 Satellite: The 5-6 July 1996 Butte-Meade Storm,” Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 126, No. 3, 1998, pp. 831-834. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0831:HDOFTG>2.0.CO;2
[4] E. J. Calianese, J. K. Jordan, E. B. Curran, A. R. Moller and G. Woodall, “The Mayfest High-Precipitation Supercell of 5 May 1995—A Case Study,” The 21st Conference on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, 12-16 August 2002, pp. 105-108.
[5] X. G. Diao, J. J. Zhu and Z. H. Liu, “Analysis of Three Supercell Storms with Doppler Weather Radar Data,” Acta Meteorologica Sinica, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2011, pp. 211-223. doi:10.1007/s13351-011-0028-5
[6] D. W. Burgess, “Single Doppler Radar Vortex Recognition: Part I—Mesocyclone Signatures,” The 17th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Seattle, 26-29 October 1976, pp. 97-103.
[7] J. T. Johnson, P. L. MacKeen, A. Witt, E. De Wayne Mitchell, G. J. Stumpf, M. D. Eilts and K. W. Thomas, “The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking (SCIT) Algorithm: An enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1998, pp. 263-276. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0263:TSCIAT>2.0.CO;2
[8] G. J. Stumpf, A. Witt, E. D. Mitchell, P. L. Spencer, J. T. Johnson, M. D. Eilts, et al., “The National Severe Storms Laboratory Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1998, pp. 304-326. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0304:TNSSLM>2.0.CO;2
[9] G. A. Tipton, E. D. Howieson, J. A. Margraf and R. R. Lee, “Optimizing the WSR-88D Mesocyclone/Tornadic Vortex Signature Algorithm Using WATADS—A Case Study,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2,1998, pp. 367-376. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0367:OTWMTV>2.0.CO;2
[10] B. T. Smith, J. L. Guyer and A. R. Dean, “The Climatology, Convective Mode, and Mesoscale Environment of Cool Season Severe Thunderstorms in the Ohio and Tennessee Valleys, 1995-2006,” The 24th Conference on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, 27-31 October 2008. http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/141968.pdf

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.