Share This Article:

Gender Differences in Adolescent Advertising Response: The Role of Involvement and Message Claim

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:121KB) PP. 547-552
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.47078    4,010 Downloads   5,734 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT


This study investigates whether gender differences in adolescents’ advertising judgments and purchase intentions are due to their level of involvement with the advertised product, and with the claim made in the ad, i.e. whether evaluative versus factual message claims are used. Male (n = 115) and female adolescents (n = 127) were randomly assigned to a mixed design. They read either factual or evaluative ads (between-subjects variable) about a product within and about a product outside their area of interests (within-subjects variable). Results show that when an ad contained a description of a high involvement product (i.e. the youth magazine), adolescent females were persuaded most by factual information, whereas when the ad contained a description of a low involvement product (the sports magazine), they were persuaded more by evaluative information. Adolescent males overall indicated a more positive attitude towards a high involvement product, but were equally persuaded by evaluative and factual information. We conclude that gendered advertising responses do exist, and that the level of involvement with the product advertised determines which type of message claim—factual versus evaluative—is most effective for each gender. Discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of these results.


Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Massar, K. & Buunk, A. (2013). Gender Differences in Adolescent Advertising Response: The Role of Involvement and Message Claim. Psychology, 4, 547-552. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.47078.

References

[1] Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 427-433. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9430-1
[2] Alreck, P. L., Settle, R. B., & Belch, M. A. (1982). Who responds to “gendered” ads, and how Masculine brands versus feminine brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 22, 25-32.
[3] Brown, J. D., & Witherspoon, E. M. (2002). The mass media and American adolescents’ health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 153-170. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00507-4
[4] Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self” and “help-others” charity adappeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising, 29, 15-28. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673614
[5] Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 330-341. doi:10.1017/S0021849903030320
[6] Bügel, K., & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 15-31.
[7] Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2011). Does attractiveness sell? Women’s attitude towards a product as a function of model attractiveness, gender priming and social comparison orientation. Psychology and Marketing, 28, 958-973. doi:10.1002/mar.20421
[8] Darley, W., & Smith, R. (1993). Advertising claim objectivity: Antecedents and effects. Journal of Marketing, 57, 100-113. doi:10.2307/1252222
[9] Darley, W., & Smith, R. (1995). Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising responses. Journal of Advertising, 24, 41-56. doi:10.1080/00913367.1995.10673467
[10] Day, G. S. (1970). Buyer attitudes and brand choice. New York: Free Press.
[11] Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s selfand task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.
[12] Edell, J. A., & Staelin, R. (1983). The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. The Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 45-61. doi:10.2307/1131221
[13] Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Beyond attitude structure: Toward the informational determinants of attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 545-556. doi:10.2307/3150624
[14] Kottler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[15] Laroche, M., Saad, G., Cleveland, M., & Browne, E. (2000). Gender differences in information search strategies for a Christmas gift. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 500-524. doi:10.1108/07363760010349920
[16] Lippa, R. A. (2010). Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1098-1110. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00320.x
[17] Meyers-Levy, J. (1989), Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In P. Cafferata, & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/DC Heath & Com.
[18] Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D., (1991). Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 63-70. doi:10.1086/209241
[19] Meyers-Levy, J., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 84-96. doi:10.2307/3172728
[20] Mitchell, V. W., & Walsh, G. (2004). Gender differences in German consumer decision-making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3, 331-346. doi:10.1002/cb.146
[21] Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: Moderating effects of gender. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 247-256. doi:10.1108/07363760510611671
[22] Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
[23] Slama, M. E., & Williams, T. G. (1990). Generalization of the market maven’s information provision tendency across product categories. In: M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 17, pp. 48-52). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
[24] Tan, S. J. (2002). Can consumers’ skepticism be mitigated by claim objectivity and claim extremity? Journal of Marketing Communications, 8, 45-64. doi:10.1080/13527260210122097
[25] Trainor, S., Delfabbro, P., Anderson, S., & Winefield, A. (2010). Leisure activities and adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.013
[26] Wang, S., Holloway, B. B., Beatty, S. E., & Hill, W. W. (2007). Adolescent influence in family purchase decisions: An update and crossnational extension. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1117-1124. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.04.004
[27] Wolin, L. D. (2003). Gender issues in advertising—An over sight. Synthesis of research: 1970-2002. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 111-129.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.