Share This Article:

Producing a Double Dividend for the EU-27 and USA with the Macro-Economic E4M-GAIA Model: Meeting G8 80% Emissions Reduction Target Leads to Economic Growth

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:602KB) PP. 51-62
DOI: 10.4236/lce.2013.42006    2,800 Downloads   4,437 Views  

ABSTRACT

The international negotiations concerning climate change, taken place during the UNFCCC conference in Durban at the end of year 2011, have failed to establish a new global agreement to reduce global emissions. Therefore, the G8 commitments on 80% reduction by 2050 seems to be the most realistic climate change mitigation framework for the time being, enhanced by the political will of the EU and USA administrations. For the needs of this paper, the G8 80% target is further extended to cover the whole EU-27 region, where the reduction commitments of the EU-27 member states are allocated based on the relevant allocation weights considered for the Kyoto Protocol obligations. This paper examines the implementation of the EU-27 and USA 80% emissions reduction target using a macro-economic hybrid model E4M-GAIA of the global economy, standing for Energy-Economy-Environment-Engineering Model of the Earth. The E4M-GAIA model, which adopts similar theoretical background with the “New Economics” school depicted mainly in the well-established Cambridge University’ E3 models, is used to implement this target and to compare it with a reference scenario, where no reduction target is pursued. Both scenarios consider that impact of the financial crisis, with updated information to the end of 2010. This paper aims to provide evidence that the proper direction of a portfolio of policies including: regulation, behavioral shift, revenue recycling, energy investments, energy and carbon pricing, can lead to double dividend, namely meeting a deep reduction target and providing gains for the economy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Dagoumas, A. (2013) Producing a Double Dividend for the EU-27 and USA with the Macro-Economic E4M-GAIA Model: Meeting G8 80% Emissions Reduction Target Leads to Economic Growth. Low Carbon Economy, 4, 51-62. doi: 10.4236/lce.2013.42006.

References

[1] R. K. Pachauri and A. Reisinger, “Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” IPCC, 2007.
[2] N. Stern, S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, D. Crane, S. Cruickshank, S. Dietz, N. Edmonson, S.-L. Garbett, L. Hamid, G. Hoffman, D. Ingram, B. Jones, N. Patmore, H. Radcliffe, R. Sathiyarajah, M. Stock, C. Taylor, T. Vernon, H. Wanjie and D. Zenghelis, “Stern Review: The Economics of ClimateChange,” HM Treasury, London, 2006.
[3] J. E. Lovelock, “Gaia as Seen through the Atmosphere,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 6, No. 8, 1972, pp. 579-580. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(72)90076-5
[4] T. Barker and W. Peterson, “The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
[5] T. Barker, “Achieving a 10% Cut in Europe’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using Additional Excise Duties: Coordinated, Uncoordinated and Unilateral Action Using the Econometric Model E3ME,” Economic Systems Research, Vol. 11, 1999, pp. 401-421. doi:10.1080/09535319900000029
[6] T. Barker, H. Pan, J. Kohler, R. Warren and S. Winne, “Decarbonizing the Global Economy with Induced Technological Change: Scenarios to 2100 Using E3MG,” In O. Edenhofer, K. Lessmann, K. Kemfert, M. Grubb and J. Kohler, Eds., Induced Technological Change: Exploring Its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization, Energy Journal Special Issue on the International Model Comparison Project, 2006.
[7] T. Barker and S. Scrieciu, “Low Stabilisation within a New Economics Macro-Econometric Framework: Insights from E3MG,” Energy Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2009.
[8] T. Barker, A. Dagoumas and J. Rubin, “The Macroeconomic Rebound Effect and the World Economy,” Energy Efficiency, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2009, pp. 411-427. doi:10.1007/s12053-009-9053-y
[9] N. Kaldor, “Economics without Equilibrium,” University College Cardiff Press, Cardiff, 1985.
[10] M. Setterfield, “The Economics of Demand-Led Growth-Challenging the Supplyside Vision of the Long Run,” Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2002.
[11] M. Scott, “A New View of Economic Growth,” Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999.
[12] J. M. McCombie and A. P. Thirlwall, “Essays on Balance of Payments Constrained Growth: Theory and Evidence,” Routledge Press, London/New York, 2004.
[13] D. Anderson and S. Winne, “Modelling Innovation and Threshold Effects in Climate Change Mitigation”, Working Paper No. 59, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2004.
[14] N. Nakicenovic and K. Riahi, “Model Runs with MES-SAGE in the Context of the Further Development of the Kyoto Protocol,” WBGU-German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin, 2003.
[15] J. R. McFarland, J. Reilly and H. J. Herzog, “Representing Energy Technologies in Top-Down Economic Models Using Bottom-Up Information,” Energy Economics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2004, pp. 685-707. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.026
[16] M. Grub, J. Kohler and D. Anderson, “Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modelling: Analytical Approached and Policy Implications,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 271-308. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083408
[17] A. Dagoumas, “E4M-GAIA: Energy-Economy-Environment-Engineering Modelling of Gaia,” Energy and Climate Change Conference, Athens, 7-8 October 2010.
[18] M. Winskel, N. Markusson, H. Jeffrey, S. Jablonski, C. Candelise, D. Ward and P. Howarth, “Technology Change and Energy Systems: Learning Pathways for Future Sources of Energy,” UK Energy Research Centre, 2008.
[19] A. Dagoumas, T. Barker and H. Pollitt, “Energy Investments under the Financial Crisis,” 2009 International Energy Workshop, Venice, 17-19 June 2009.
[20] IEA, “World Energy Outlook 2010,” International Energy Agency, Paris, 2010.
[21] IEA, “Energy Technology Perspectives 2008-Scenarios and strategies to 2050,” International Energy Agency, Paris, 2008.
[22] D. Anderson and S. Winne, “Energy System Change and External Effects in Climate Change Mitigation,” Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, pp. 359-378. doi:10.1017/S1355770X07003580
[23] S. Sorrell and J. Dimitropoulos, “The Rebound Effect: Microeconomic Definitions, Limitations and Extensions,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2007, pp. 636-649. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.013
[24] H. Hottinen, P. Meibom, A. Orths, F. Van Hulle, C. Ensslin, L. Hofmann, J. McCann, J. Pierik, J. O. Tande, A. Estanqueiro, L. Soder, G. Strbac, B. Parsons, J. C. Smith and B. Lemstrom, “Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power,” Task 25 for IEA WIND Implementing Agreement, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2006.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.