Pitting Corrosion Investigation of Cantilever Beams Using F. E. Method

Jacob Nagler

Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

DOI: 10.4236/wjm.2013.32007                

Abstract

Carbon steel cantilever beams are widely used in many applications in aerospace, civil and mechanical engineering. Pitting corrosion is a phenomenon which places severe limitations on the design of such applications. As such, understanding this phenomenon and the methods to deal with it, are of a great importance. This paper presents numerical investigation by using F. E. (Finite Element) simulation on the load carrying capacity of corroded cantilever beams with pitting corrosion damage. The pitting corrosion hole shape has been modeled using ASTM G46 Standard Guide. Several different cases of pitting corrosion, represented by hemispherical holes, were modeled and examined by using ANSYS computer program. Clamped edge constraint was used on one end, while the other end was free. In these F. E. models, element of Solid95 was used and comparison to Bernoulli-Euler theory was made. The effect of the radius of the pitting corrosion holes on the stresses in the beam was examined in comparison to yield stress. It has been found that the M. S. (Margin of Safety) has been reduced gradually with increasing radii. Agreement with Bernoulli-Euler theory has been achieved only for small radii. Moreover, three methods of pitting corrosion repairs were examined, together with Bernoulli-Euler theory comparison: 1) Regular surface repair; 2) Extension surface repair; and 3) “Handy Removal”. It was found that extension surface repair has the highest M. S. value.

Keywords

Pitting Corrosion; Carbon Steel; Bernoulli Euler; Simulation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	D. W. Hoeppner, “Pitting Corrosion: Morphology and Characterization,” NATO-RTO-AG-AVT-140, 2011.
[2]	W. P. Zhang, H. C. Dai, X. L. Gu and S. N. Wu, “Effects of Corrosion Pits on Mechanical Properties of Corroded Steel Bars,” Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2010, pp. 3504-3511.
[3]	V. Piprani, P. Samal, B. B. Verma and P. K. Ray, “Fatigue Life Estimation of Pre-Cprrpded Aluminum Alloy Specimen,” Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2009.
[4]	S. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee and B. Doley, “Breathing Crack in Beam and Cantilever Using Contact Model Dynamic Analysis—A Study,” International Journal of Wisdom Based Computing, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp. 39-42.
[5]	Z. H. M. E. Nouri, M. R. Khedmati and S. Sadeghifard, “An Effective Thickness Proposal for Strength Evaluation of One Side Pitted Steel Plates under Uniaxial Compression,” Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2012, pp. 475-496. doi:10.1590/S1679-78252012000400004
[6]	G. Xu, T. C. Ai and Q. Wang, “Simulation Analysis on Mechanical Properties for Corroded Deformed Steel Bar,” International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation, Vol. 2, 2010, pp. 350-353.
[7]	T. Potisuk, C. C. Higgins, T. H. Miller and C. Y. Solomon, “Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Corrosion Subjected to Shear,” Advances in Civil Engineering, 2011, Article ID: 706803.
[8]	Q. Zhang, X. Guo, N. Dai and P. Lu, “Corrosion and Fatigue Testing of Micro Sized 304 Stainless Steel Beams Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2009, pp. 187-193.
[9]	J. M. Ruwan, S. Appuhamy, M. Ohga, T. Kaita and R. Dissanayake, “Reduction of Ultimate Strength Due to Corrosion—A Finite Element Computational Method,” International Journal of Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011, pp. 194-207.
[10]	ASTM G 46-94, 2005, “Standard Guide for Examintion and Evaluation of Pitting Corrosion”.
[11]	“Military Handbook—MIL-HDBK-5H: Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures,” 5th Edition, Department of Defense, USA, 1998,
[12]	ANSYS, INC., “ANSYS 10.0 Information Documents,” 2005.