Share This Article:

The ODM Model and Co-Evolution in the Global Notebook PC Industry: Evidence from Taiwan

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:617KB) PP. 69-78
DOI: 10.4236/aasoci.2013.31009    4,820 Downloads   7,465 Views   Citations


This paper aims to explore the evolutionary dynamics of the ODM model in the global notebook PC industry. We found that the “modular design” process of notebook products requires plenty of technical interaction and tacit knowledge exchanges among branding companies, key component suppliers and ODMs. Taiwanese ODMs serve as important sources of information and knowledge for specifications formulation through their system integration and technological development abilities. With increasing complexity and shorter design life-spans, the mutual dependency among the lead firms and ODMs increases, leading to the regional agglomeration in Taiwan and China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Yang, D. & Chen, Y. (2013). The ODM Model and Co-Evolution in the Global Notebook PC Industry: Evidence from Taiwan. Advances in Applied Sociology, 3, 69-78. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2013.31009.


[1] Amsden, A. H., & Chu, W. W. (2003). Beyond late development: Taiwan’s upgrading policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[2] Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[3] Berggren, C., & Bengtsson, L. (2004). Rethinking outsourcing in manufacturing: A tale of two telecom ?rms. European Management Journal, 22, 211-223. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.01.011
[4] Borrus, M. (2000). The resurgence of US electronics: Asian production networks and the rise of Wintelism. In: M. Borrus, D. Ernst, & S. Haggard (Eds.), International production networks in Asia: Rivalry or riches (pp. 57-79). London and New York: Routledge.
[5] Borrus, M., & Zysman, J. (1997). Globalization with borders. Industry and Innovation, 4, 141-166. doi:10.1080/13662719700000008
[6] Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 179-205. doi:10.1093/icc/10.1.179
[7] Campagnolo, D., & Camuffo, A. (2010). The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 259-283.
[8] Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of american industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[9] Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in american business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[10] Chandler, A. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[11] Chen, S. H. (2002). Global production networks and information technology: The case of Taiwan. Industry and Innovation, 9, 249-265. doi:10.1080/1366271022000034480
[12] Chu, W. W. (2009). Can Taiwan’s second movers upgrade via branding? Research Policy, 38, 1054-1065. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.014
[13] Cyhn, J. W. (2002). Technology transfer and international production: The development of the electronics industry in Korea. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
[14] Dedrick, J., & Kraemer, K. L. (1998). Asia’s computer challenge: Threat or opportunity for the United States and the world? New York: Oxford University Press.
[15] Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K. L., & Linden, G. (2010). Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22, 1-36.
[16] Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 153-172. doi:10.1007/BF01236366
[17] Ernst, D. (2005). Limits to modularity: Reflections on recent developments in chip design. Industry and Innovation, 12, 303-335. doi:10.1080/13662710500195918
[18] Ernst, D. (2010). Upgrading through innovation in a small network economy: Insights from Taiwan’s IT industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19, 295-324. doi:10.1080/10438590802469560
[19] Frigant, V., & Layan, J. B. (2009). Modular production and the new division of labour within Europe: The perspective of French automotive parts suppliers. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16, 11- 25. doi:10.1177/0969776408098930
[20] Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78-104. doi:10.1080/09692290500049805
[21] Helper, S., MacDuffie, J. P., & Sabel, C. (2000). Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 443-488. doi:10.1093/icc/9.3.443
[22] Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23, 1171-1193. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00035-B
[23] Hobday, M. (2003). Innovation in Asian industrialization: A Gerschenkronian perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 31, 293-314.
[24] Hoetker, G. (2006). Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 27, 501-518. doi:10.1002/smj.528
[25] Hsu, J. Y., & Saxenian, A. (2000). The limits of guanxi capitalism: Transnational collaboration between Taiwan and the USA. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1991-2005. doi:10.1068/a3376
[26] Kawakami, M. (2011). Inter-?rm dynamics in notebook PC value chains and the rise of Taiwanese original design manufacturing firms. In: M. Kawakami, & T. J. Sturgeon (Eds.), The dynamics of local learning in global value chains: Experiences from East Asia (pp. 16-42). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[27] Lamoreaux, N. R., Raff, D. M. G., & Temin, P. (2003). Beyond markets and hierarchies: Toward a new synthesis of American business history. American Historical Review, 108, 404-433. doi:10.1086/533240
[28] Langlosi, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Corporate Change, 49, 19-37. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00056-2
[29] Langlosi, R. N. (2003). The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 351-385. doi:10.1093/icc/12.2.351
[30] Langlosi, R. N. (2004). Chandler in a larger frame: Markets, transaction costs, and organizational form in history. Enterprise and Society, 5, 355-375. doi:10.1093/es/khh055
[31] Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Beknap Press.
[32] Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2004). Neither modularity nor relational contracting: Inter-firm collaboration in the new economy. Enterprise and Society, 5, 388-403. doi:10.1093/es/khh057
[33] Saxenian, A., & Hsu, J. Y. (2001). The Silicon Valley-hsinchu connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 893-920. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.893
[34] Steinle, C., & Schiele, H. (2008). Limits to global sourcing? Strategic consequences of dependency on international suppliers: Cluster theory, resource-based view and case studies. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.001
[35] Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
[36] Sturgeon, T. J. (2002). Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 451-496. doi:10.1093/icc/11.3.451
[37] Sturgeon, T. J. (2003). What really goes on in Silicon Valley? Spatial clustering and dispersal in modular production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 199-225. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.2.199
[38] Sturgeon, T. J., & Kawakami, M. (2011). Global value chains in the electronics industry: Characteristics, crisis, and upgrading opportunities for firms from developing countries. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 4, 120-147. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2011.041902
[39] Sturgeon, T. J., & Lee, J. R. (2005). Industrial co-evolution: A comparison of Taiwan and north American electronics contract manufacturers. In: S. Berger, & R. K. Lester (Eds.), Global Taiwan: Building competitive strengths in a new international economy (pp. 33-75). Armonk: An East Gate Book.
[40] Sturgeon, T. J., Biesebroeck, V., & Gereffi, G. (2008). Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 297-321. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn007
[41] Wen, H., & Yang, D. Y. R. (2010). The missing link between technological standards and value-chain governance: The case of patent-distribution strategies in the mobile-communication industry. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2109-2130. doi:10.1068/a41203
[42] Yang, Y. R., & Hsia, C. J. (2007). Spatial clustering and organizational governance of trans-border production networks: A case study of Taiwanese information-technology companies in the Greater Suzhou Area, China. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1346-1363.
[43] Yang, D. Y. R., & Coe, N. M. (2009). The governance of global production networks and regional development: A case study of Taiwanese PC production networks. Growth and Change, 40, 30-53. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00460.x
[44] Yung, I. S., Lee, H. W., & Lai, M. H. (2009). Competitive advantages created by a cluster collaboration network for supplier management in notebook PC production. Total Quality Management, 20, 763-775. doi:10.1080/14783360903037358

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.