Share This Article:

Dyad and Triad Census Analysis of Crisis Communication Network

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:235KB) PP. 32-41
DOI: 10.4236/sn.2013.21004    4,655 Downloads   8,477 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Dyad and triad census summarize much of the network level structural information of a given directed network. They have been found very useful in analyzing structural properties of social networks. This study aims to explore crisis communication network by following dyad and triad census analysis approach to investigate the association of microlevel communication patterns with organizational crisis. This study further tests hypothesis related to the process of data generation and tendency of the structural pattern of transitivity using dyad and triad census output. The changing communication network at Enron Corporation during the period of its crisis is analyzed in this study. Significant differences in the presence of different isomorphism classes or microlevel patterns of both dyad and triad census are noticed in crisis and non-crisis period network of Enron email corpus. It is also noticed that crisis communication network shows more transitivity compared to the non-crisis communication network.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Uddin, S. and Hossain, L. (2013) Dyad and Triad Census Analysis of Crisis Communication Network. Social Networking, 2, 32-41. doi: 10.4236/sn.2013.21004.

References

[1] P. Monge and N. Contractor, “Theories of Communication Networks,” Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.
[2] M. Rustin, “Structural and Unconscious Implications of the Dyad and Triad: An Essay in Theoretical Integration; Durkheim, Simmel, Freud,” The Sociological Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 179-201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1971.tb00626.x
[3] S. Fukuzumi, K. Ohkubo, J. Ortiz, A. M. Gutierrez, F. Fernandez-Lazaro and A. Sastre-Santos, “Control of Pho- toinduced Electron Transfer in Zinc Phthalocyanine— Perylenediimide Dyad and Triad by the Magnesium Ion,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 112, No. 43, 2008, pp. 10744-10752. doi:10.1021/jp805464e
[4] K. Mellahi and A. Wilkinson, “Organizational Failure: A Critique of Recent Research and a Proposed Integrative Framework,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2004, pp. 21-41. doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00095.x
[5] C. Hermann, “Some Consequences of Crisis Which Limit the Viability of Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1963, pp. 61-82. doi:10.2307/2390887
[6] T. Milburn, R. Schuler and K. Watman, “Organizational Crisis,” Part I: Definition and Conceptualization. Human Relations, Vol. 36, No. 12, 1983, pp. 1141-1160. doi:10.1177/001872678303601205
[7] W. Weitzel and E. Jonsson, “Decline in Organizations: A Literature Integration and Extension,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1989, pp. 91-109. doi:10.2307/2392987
[8] J. Sheppard, “Strategy and Bankruptcy: An Exploration into Organizational Death,” Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1994, pp. 795-833.
[9] H. Smith, Y. Rogers and M. Brady, “Managing One’s Social Network: Does Age Make a Difference,” Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT, Zurich, 2003, pp. 551-558.
[10] B. Wellman, “For a Social Network Analysis of Computer Networks: A Sociological Perspective on Collaborative Work and Virtual Community,” Association for Computing Machinery, 1996.
[11] R. Guimera, L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, F. Giralt and A. Arenas, “Self-Similar Community Structure in a Network of Human Interactions,” Physical Review E, Vol. 68, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065103
[12] J. Tyler, D. Wilkinson and B. Huberman, “E-mail as Spectroscopy: Automated Discovery of Community Struc- ture within Organizations,” The Information Society, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2005, pp. 143-153. doi:10.1080/01972240590925348
[13] P. Carrington, J. Scott and S. Wasserman, “Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis,” Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2005. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811395
[14] S. Wasserman and K. Faust, “Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
[15] L. Katz and J. Powell, “Measurement of the Tendency toward Reciprocation of Choice,” Sociometry, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1955, pp. 403-409. doi:10.2307/2785876
[16] J. Davis and S. Leinhardt, “The Structure of Positive Interpersonal Relations in Small Groups,” In M. Berger, J. Zelditch and B. Anderson, Eds., Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, 1967. pp. 218-251.
[17] P. Healy and K. Palepu, “The Fall of Enron,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2003, pp. 3-26. doi:10.1257/089533003765888403
[18] L. Fox, “Enron: The Rise and Fall,” John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, 2003.
[19] E. Hamilton, “An Exploration of the Relationship between Loss of Legitimacy and the Sudden Death of Organizations,” Group & Organization Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2006, pp. 327-358. doi:10.1177/1059601106286885
[20] J. Shetty and J. Adibi, “The Enron Email Dataset Database Schema and Brief Statistical Report,” Information Sciences Institute Technical Report, University of Southern California, 2004.
[21] S. Borgatti, M. Everett and L. Freeman, “UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis,” Harvard Analytic Technologies, 2002.
[22] P. Holland and S. Leinhardt, “Holland and Leinhardt Reply: Some Evidence on the Transitivity of Positive Interpersonal Sentiment,” Journal Storage, Vol. 77, No. 6, 1972, p. 1205- 1209.
[23] G. Homans, “Bringing Men Back in,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1964, pp. 809-818. doi:10.2307/2090864
[24] G. Homans, “Social Behavior as Exchange,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 6, 1958, pp. 597-606. doi:10.1086/222355
[25] A. Kadushin and G. Kadushin, “The Social Work Interview,” Columbia University Press, New York, 1983.
[26] N. Lin and W. Ensel, “Life Stress and Health: Stressors and Resources,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1989, pp. 382-399. doi:10.2307/2095612
[27] S. H. Murshed, S. Uddin and L. Hossain, “Understanding Communication Network Cohesiveness during Organiza- tional Crisis: Effects of Clique and Transitivity,” International Conference on Information Systems, St Louis, 2010.
[28] J. Lanzetta, “Group Behavior under Stress,” Human Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1955, p. 29. doi:10.1177/001872675500800102
[29] G. Simmel, “Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations,” Free Press, 1964.
[30] L. Weller, “The Effects of Anxiety on Cohesiveness and Rejection,” Human Relations, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1963, pp. 189. doi:10.1177/001872676301600208
[31] M. Sherif, “In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation,” Houghton Mifflin Boston, 1966.
[32] S. Uddin, S. T. H. Murshed, and L. Hossain, “Power-Law Behaviour in Complex Organizational Communication Network during Crisis,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, Vol. 390, No. 15, 2011, pp. 2845- 2853.
[33] S. Uddin, L. Hossain, S. T. Murshed, and J. W. Crawford, “Static versus Dynamic Topology of Complex Commu- nications Network during Organizational Crisis,” Com- plexity, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2011, pp. 27-36. doi:10.1002/cplx.20349
[34] S. Uddin, M. Piraveenan, K. Chung, and L. Hossain, “To- pological Analysis of Longitudinal Networks,” Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2013.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.