Share This Article:

Economic viability outcome of assisted reproduction technology setup: Mathematical model

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:152KB) PP. 116-122
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31022    3,828 Downloads   5,318 Views  


Objective: To develop an evaluation method measuring the economic viability outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART) setup in a concerted fashion. Methods: A mathematical model namely; economic viability outcome (EVO) value has been purposely constructed. The model consists of three important domains: 1) Economic performance outcome of the setup; 2) Sustainability outcome; and 3) Control outcome. The model was put to the test at Banoon ART centre, the military hospital in Bahrain during the period Sep 2004 to Sep 2006. Results: When this model was stringently applied at the said centre, the EVO value was increased by 40% from 0.84 to 1.40 within 12 months of rectifications which started Sep 2005. Even though the economic performance has dropped by approximately 22%, due to an extra spending towards assets and lower utilization of treatment cycles, the centre showed improvements at various levels as evident from the resulting higher EVO value. Conclusions: EVO value as a model provides a mechanism by which ART setup can be economically evaluated and self-assessed. It can also generate a method for measuring the safety and efficacy of the treating centre.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Eskandarani, H. (2013) Economic viability outcome of assisted reproduction technology setup: Mathematical model. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 116-122. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31022.


[1] Rhoton-Vlasak, A. (2000) Infections and infertility. Primary Care Update Ob/GYNS, 1, 200-206.
[2] Palagiano, A., et al. (2004) FSH: Urinary and recombinant. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1, S30-S33. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.023
[3] Devlin, N. and Parkin, D. (2003) Funding fertility: Issues in the allocation and distribution of resources to assisted reproduction technologies. Human Fertility (Cambridge), 6, 2-6. doi:10.1080/1464770312331369153
[4] Van Voorhis, B.J. (2003) Evaluating economic studies in reproductive medicine. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 21, 85-93. doi:10.1055/s-2003-39998
[5] Eskandarani, H.A. (1996) Assisted reproduction technology: State-of the-art. The Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISESCO) Publication, Rabat, 73-75.
[6] Eskandarani, H.A. (2007) A code of practice is overdue for assisted reproductive technology in the GCC countries: Some comments and suggestions. Qatar Medical Journal, 16, 16-19.
[7] Eskandarani, H.A. (2010) A bahraini registry of assisted reproductive technology for period of 2000-2006: Hoping to stave off reporting stalemate. Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 21, 101-110. doi:10.1016/S1001-7844(10)60018-1
[8] Collins, J.A. (2002) An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 265-277. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.3.265

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.