Share This Article:

What Engages Doctoral Students in Biosciences in Doctoral Studies?

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:160KB) PP. 1231-1237
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A182    3,130 Downloads   4,781 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Reduced levels of engagement and dropping out have been identified as a major problem in doctoral education worldwide, including in the biosciences. Research suggests that engagement predict student satisfaction, degree completion, and persistence in studies. To explore the anatomy of engaging experiences altogether 40 doctoral students’ theme interviews were analyzed by using abductive strategy. Accordingly, we were able to identify factors that promoted doctoral students’ engagement in their work. In general, the students described many experiences of satisfaction, inspiration, joy, positive work drive, meaningfulness, and fulfillment in terms of their doctoral studies. The doctoral students’ engagement in their work originated from various contexts of academic work, including research, scholarly communities, the supervisory relationship, and formal studies. The results indicate that although the interrelationship between individuals and the environment is complex and it is difficult to predict the outcome at an individual level, the central ingredients of engaging experiences among biosciences can be identified. Accordingly, activities that contribute to the doctoral students’ sense of competence, autonomy, belonging, and contribution ought to be considered when trying to develop engaging learning environments for doctoral students. The results provide evidence-based tools for developing doctoral education in an academic environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Virtanen, V. & Pyhalto, K. (2012). What Engages Doctoral Students in Biosciences in Doctoral Studies?. Psychology, 3, 1231-1237. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A182.

References

[1] Anderson, B. (2011). Predictive relationships among learner characteristics, academic involvement, and doctoral education outcomes. Dissertation Doctor of Philosophy. Denton, TX: Department of Counseling and Higher Education, University of North Texas.
[2] Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0001
[3] Bair, C., & Haworth, J. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 19 (pp. 481-534). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[4] Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M, P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187-200. doi:10.1080/02678370802393649
[5] Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 20, 235-255. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.235
[6] Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241-259. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241
[7] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 237-288.
[8] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychological Association, 49, 182-185.
[9] Eccles, J. S. (2008). Agency and structure in human development. Research in Human Development, 5, 231-243. doi:10.1080/15427600802493973
[10] Edwards, J. R. (2008). Person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 167-230. doi:10.1080/19416520802211503
[11] Gardner, S. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine” Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54, 723-740. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
[12] Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovations in Higher Education, 33, 125-138. doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
[13] Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669-700. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
[14] González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165-174. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
[15] Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Williams, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495-513. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
[16] Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34, 3-13. doi:10.3102/0013189X034002003
[17] Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 535-555. doi:10.1080/03075070500249161
[18] Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
[19] Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Van Rhenen, W., & Van Doornen, L. J. P. (2006). Do burned-out and work-engaged employees differ in the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, and Health, 32, 339-348. doi:10.5271/sjweh.1029
[20] Lindblom-Yl?nne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285-298. doi:10.1080/03075070600680539
[21] Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W., McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 3-17. doi:10.1080/07294360500453012
[22] Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
[23] McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ way of thinking and practicing in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49, 255-289. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0
[24] Marques, S., Pais-Ribeiro, J., & Lopez, S. (2011). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting mental health and academic achievement in children and adolescents: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 1049-1062. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9244-4
[25] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[26] Myers. D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56-67. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56
[27] Nettles, M. T., & Millet, C. M. (2006). Three magic words: Getting to PhD. New York: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
[28] Pyh?lt?, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 221-232. doi:10.1080/13601440903106551
[29] Pyh?lt?, K., Stubb, J., & Tuomainen, J. (2011). International evaluation of research and Doctoral Education at the University of Helsinki— To the top and out to society. Summary Report on Doctoral students’ and principal Investigators’ Doctoral Training Experiences. URL (last checked 28 September 2012). http://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/evaluation2011/Survey+on+doctoral+training
[30] Rich, G. J. (2003). The positive psychology of youth and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 1-3. doi:10.1023/A:1021017421413
[31] Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002a). Burnout and engagement in university students a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464 481 doi:10.1177/0022022102033005003
[32] Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002b). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326
[33] Stubb, J., Pyh?lt?, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion? Ph.D. students’ experienced socio-psycho logical well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 33-50. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572
[34] Verquer, M. L., & Beehr, T.A., Wagner, S. H. A. (2003). A meta analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473-489. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.