Share This Article:

Water Metaphors in Dao de jing: A Conceptual Analysis

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:189KB) PP. 151-158
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2012.24020    6,913 Downloads   11,877 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the use of water metaphors in the ancient Chinese text Dao de jing (168 BC), which is the foundational text of Daoism and a primary source of modern Chinese ideas about life and politics. The paper analyses how the image of water is used in the text to facilitate the conceptualization of the core philosophical concepts. The analysis is based on the theoretical framework of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; Kövecses, 2002). Water is discovered as occupying an essential position in the conceptualization of the Daoist worldview, which is manifested in notions of 道 dao and 德 de. It demonstrates that a cognitive approach offers an effective way to explore the cognitive basis of the text’s views on the eternal cosmological processing and of the application of morality in the human world.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lu, Y. (2012). Water Metaphors in Dao de jing: A Conceptual Analysis. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2, 151-158. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2012.24020.

References

[1] Allan, S. (1997). The way of water and sprouts of virtue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[2] Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2003). Daodejing: Making this life significant: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
[3] Chan, W. T. (1963). The way of Lao-tzu. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs Merrill.
[4] Chen, F. H. (2009). Ancient Chinese Dictionary. Beijing: Commerce Publishing House.
[5] Chen, G. M., & Holt, G. R. (2002). Persuasion through the water metaphor in Dao De Jing. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11, 153 171.
[6] Duan, Y. C. (1815). Commentary on the Shuōwén Jíezì. Shanghai: Shanghai Chinese Classics Publishing House.
[7] Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
[8] Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
[9] Gao, M. (1996). Notes on silk text Laozi. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
[10] Garrett, M. (1993a). Pathos reconsidered from the perspective of clas sical Chinese rhetorical theories. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 19-39. doi:10.1080/00335639309384017
[11] Garrett, M. (1993b). Wit, power, and oppositional groups: A case study of “Pure Talk”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 303-318. doi:10.1080/00335639309384037
[12] Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Goddard, C. (2002). Explicating emotions across languages and cultures: A semantic approach. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14] Hansen, C. (1992). A daoisttheory of Chinese thought. New York: Ox ford University Press.
[15] Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[16] Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[17] K?vecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. New York: Cambridge Uni versity Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614408
[18] Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[19] Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphors and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. In M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[20] Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[21] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[22] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
[23] Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reasons: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[24] Lu, X. (1994). The theory of persuasion in Han Fei Tzu and its impact on Chinese communication behaviors. The Howard Journal of Communications, 5, 108-122. doi:10.1080/10646179309361654
[25] Ma, R. (2000). Water-related figurative language in the rhetoric of Mencius. In A. Gonzalez, & D. V. Tanno (Eds.), Rhetoric in intercultural contexts (pp. 119-129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[26] Moeller, H. G. (2006). The philosophy of the Daodejing. New York: Columbia University Press.
[27] Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[28] Roberts, M. (2001). Dao dejing: The book of the way. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[29] Schwartz, B. (1985). The world of thought in ancient China. Boston, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[30] Slingerland, E. G. (2003). Effortless action: Wu-wei as Conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China. New York: Oxford University Press.
[31] Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
[32] Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511521256
[33] Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[34] Yu, N. (2007). Heart and cognition in ancient Chinese philosophy. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 27-47. doi:10.1163/156853707X171801
[35] Yu, N. (2009). The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110213348

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.