Share This Article:

Axel Hägerström, Max Weber and Michel Foucault

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:80KB) PP. 347-354
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2012.24046    5,260 Downloads   7,996 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

In order to shed new light upon Swedish philosopher Axel H?gerstr?m (1868-1939), Michel Foucault’s key distinction concerning the “ontology of the present” appears very promising. H?gerstr?m published a number of books and articles in both general philosophy and social criticism, the former focussing upon ontology and epistemology, whereas the latter contained a painstaking cultural critique, aiming at demystifying the established moral conceptions, the heralded religion and authoritative law.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lane, J. (2012). Axel Hägerström, Max Weber and Michel Foucault. Sociology Mind, 2, 347-354. doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.24046.

References

[1] Bengtsson, J. (1991). Den fenomenologiska rorelsen i sverige. Goteborg: Daidalos.
[2] Cassirer, E. (1939). Axel Hagerstrom. Eine Studie zur schwedischen Philosophie der Gegenwart. Goteborg: Elander.
[3] Eckhoff, T. (1974). Justice: Its determinants in social interaction. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
[4] Eckhoff, T. (1976). Retten og samfunnet. Oslo: Tanum-Norli.
[5] Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
[6] Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The foucault reader (pp. 32-50). New York: Pantheon Books.
[7] Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allan Lane.
[8] Fries, M. (1944). Verklighetsbegreppet enligt hagerstrom. Uppsala: Lundequistska.
[9] Fries, M. (1945). Antwort auf anders wedbergs bespechung des buches. Theoria, 11, 71-74. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1945.tb00004.x
[10] Geiger, T. (1946). Debat med uppsala om moral og ret. Lund: Gleerup.
[11] Gutting, G. (2005) Foucault. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[12] Hare, R. M. (1991). The language of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Hedenius, I. (1965). Om ratt och moral. Stockholm: Wahlstrom & Widstrand.
[14] Hagerstrom, A. (1904). Stat och ratt. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wicksell.
[15] Hagerstrom, A. (1908.) Das Prinzip der Wissenschaft. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wicksell.
[16] Hagerstrom, A. (1909). Social teleologi i marxismen. Uppsala: Akade- miska boktryckeriet.
[17] Hagerstrom, A. (1927). Der romische obligationsbegriff. I. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wicksell.
[18] Hagerstrom, A. (1929). Hagerstrom. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen (pp. 111-159). Leipzig: Meiner.
[19] Hagerstrom, A. (1939). Socialfilosofiska uppsatser. Stockholm: Bonniers.
[20] Hagerstrom, A. (1946). De socialistiska ideerna historia. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
[21] Hagerstrom, A. (1952.) Moralpsykologi. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
[22] Hagerstrom, A. (1953). Inquiries into the nature of law and morals. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.
[23] Hagerstrom, A. (1957). Filosofi och vetenskap. Stockholm: Ehlins.
[24] Hagerstrom, A. (1963). Ratten och staten. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
[25] Hagerstrom, A. (1964). Philosophy and religion. London: Allen & Unwin.
[26] Kelsen, H. (1933) Den rena rattslaran. Dess metod och grundbegrepp. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 36, 193-244.
[27] Kelsen, H. (1979) Theorie generale des normes. Wien: Manz Verlag.
[28] Kramer, M., Simmonds, N. E., & Steiner, H. (2000). A debate over rights: Philosophical inquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.001.0001
[29] Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[30] Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[31] Lundstedt, W. (1932). Die unwissenschaftlichkeit der rechtswissen-schaft I. Berlin-Grünevald: Walther Rothschild.
[32] Lundstedt, W. (1936). Die unwissenschafttlichkeit der rechtswissen-schaft II. Berlin-Grunevald: Walther Rothschild.
[33] Marc-Wogau, K. (1968). Studier till axel hagerstroms filosofi. Stockholm: Prisma.
[34] Merquior, J. G. (1991). Foucault. London: Fontana.
[35] Mindus, P. (2009). A real mind. The life and work of axel Hagerstrom. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2895-2
[36] Moritz, M. (1967). Inledning i vardeteori. Vardesatsteori och vardeontologi. Lund: Studentlittearatur.
[37] Nordin, S. (1984). Fran Hagerstrom till hedenius. Lund: Gleerup.
[38] Olivecrona, K. (1966). Rattsordningen. Lund: Gleerup.
[39] Oxenstierna, G. (1938). Vad ar uppsala-filosofien? Stockholm: Bonniers.
[40] Popper, K. R. (2002). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.
[41] Ross, A. (1934). Virkelighed og gyldighed i retslaeren. Kobenhavn: Levin & Munksgaard
[42] Ross, A. (1966). Om ret og retferdighed. Kobenhavn: Nyt Nordisk Forlag, Arnold.
[43] Petersson, B. (1973). Axel Hagerstroms vardeteori. Uppsala Universitet: Filosofiska studier utgivna av filosofiska foreningen, nr 17.
[44] Posner, R. A. (1993). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[45] Posner, R. A. (1999). The problematics of moral and legal theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[46] Serpe, A. (2006). Analysis of language and legal rights within the Scandinavian debate. Human rights: a hidden essence? Frónesis, 13.
[47] Simmons, N. (2008). Central issues in jurisprudence. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
[48] Strang, J. (2011). History transfer politics. Five studies on the legacy of uppsala philosophy. Helsinki: Filosofiska Studies fran Helsingfors Universitet.
[49] Urmson, J. (1969). The emotive theory of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[50] Quine, W. V., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[51] Weber, M. (2010). Die protestantische ethik und der geist des capitalismus. München: Beck Verlag.
[52] Weber, M. (1904). Die “Objektivitat” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik ,19, 22-87.
[53] Wedberg, A. (1944). Review of martin fries: Verklighetsbegreppet enligt hagerstrom. Theoria, 10, 250-252.
[54] Wedberg, A. (1951). Some problems in the logical analysis of legal science. Theoria, 17, 246-275. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1951.tb00247.x
[55] Wedberg, A. (1966). Filosofins historia III. Stockholm: Bonniers.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.