An Improved 6S Code for Atmospheric Correction Based on Water Vapor Content

Abstract

Water vapor content in the atmosphere is very significant for atmospheric correction of optical remote sensing data. Nowadays, the common atmospheric correction models use a single value of the average water vapor content of the study area to perform atmospheric correction. As the distribution of water vapor content varies greatly with time and space, it is obviously inaccurate to represent the total water vapor conditions of the whole area by just reading the average water vapor content. In this study, we altered the 6S sources so that it could read the water vapor content image which was retrieved from MODIS 1 km data. Atmospheric correction was implemented for the band 1 of MODIS 500 m data pixel-by-pixel using the improved 6S model. In comparison with the traditional 6S model, this improved 6S model is more reasonable in atmospheric correction, for it considers the spatial distribution of the water vapor content retrieved from MODIS data in the near infrared to define the atmospheric conditions for simulating the atmospheric radiative transfer. The results corrected by the improved 6S model showed more reasonable in pixel spatial distribution and closer histogram with the original image than those by traditional 6S model.

Share and Cite:

Y. Zhang, X. Wang and Y. Chen, "An Improved 6S Code for Atmospheric Correction Based on Water Vapor Content," Advances in Remote Sensing, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2012, pp. 14-18. doi: 10.4236/ars.2012.11002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] B. Cairns and B. E. Carlson, “Atmospheric Correction and Its Application to an Analysis of Hyperion Data,” IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1232-1245. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2003.813134
[2] E. F. Vermote, D. Tanre, J. L. Deuze, M. Herman, and J.-J. Morcrette, “Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: An Overview,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1997, pp. 675-686. doi:10.1109/36.581987
[3] B. Y. Wu, W. Li, H. B. Chen, F. Li, W. X. Zhang and D. Lu, “Practical Algorithms of Atmospheric Radiative Trans- fer,” Meteorological Press, Beijing, 1998, pp. 21-40 (in Chinese).
[4] S. L. Liang, H. L. Fang and M. Z. Chen, “Atmospheric Correction of Landsat ETM+ Land Surface Imagery-Part I: Method,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2001, pp. 2490-2498. doi:10.1109/36.964986
[5] Y. J. Kaufman and B. C. Gao, “Remote Sensing of Water Vapor in the Near IR from EOS/MODIS,” IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1992, pp. 871-884. doi:10.1109/36.175321
[6] J. A. Sobrino and J. E. Kharraz, “Surface Temperature and Water Vapor Retrieval from MODIS Data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 24, No. 24, 2003, pp. 5161-5182. doi:10.1080/0143116031000102502
[7] K. B. Mao, H. D. Li, D. Y. Hu, J. Wang, J. X. Huang, et al., “Estimation of Water Vapor Content in Near-Infrared Bands around 1 mm from MODIS Data by Using RM- MN,” Optics Express, Vol. 18, No. 9, 2010, pp. 9542- 9554. doi:10.1364/OE.18.009542
[8] W. J. Zhao, M. Tamura and H. Takahashi, “Atmospheric and Spectral Corrections for Estimating Surface Albedo from Satellite Data Using 6S Code,” Remote Sensing of environment, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2000, pp. 202-212. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00204-2
[9] 6S User Guide Version 2, 1997.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.