Share This Article:

Entrepreneurial Activity, Entry and Persistence of Firms: Econometric Analysis Based on Count Data

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:235KB) PP. 87-104
DOI: 10.4236/ti.2012.32012    3,152 Downloads   5,603 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the impact of technological specification and innovation dynamics in Schumpeterian perspective on the technological performance (innovation) of firms. Using an original data construction, our empirical analysis is carried out with patent and survey databases on French firms. We classify the various possible determinants of innovation into two groups of variables; firm-specific variables and sectorial-specific variables. We utilise patent data from European Patent Office (EPO) database (classified in 30 technological classes), survey of the R&D resources and, firm’s surveys in French (EAE) for French firms for the period 1993-2001. The results of our count data models show that entrepreneurial activity increases the innovation output and the sectorial-specific variables have an impact on patent application.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

S. Negassi and G. Shiri, "Entrepreneurial Activity, Entry and Persistence of Firms: Econometric Analysis Based on Count Data," Technology and Investment, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2012, pp. 87-104. doi: 10.4236/ti.2012.32012.

References

[1] S. Klepper, “Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle,” Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1993.
[2] B. Jovanovic and G. M. MacDonald, “The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 2, 1994, 322-347. doi:10.1086/261934
[3] J. M. Utterback and F. F. Suàrez, “Innovation, Competition and Industry Structure,” Work Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.
[4] C. Freeman, “Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lesson from Japan,” Pinter Publishers, London, 1987.
[5] R. R. Nelson, “National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
[6] B. Lundvall, B. Johnson, E. Anderson and B. Dalum, “National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building,” Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2002, pp. 213-231.
[7] A. Saxenian, “Inside-Out: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley 1994, and Rout 128,” In: C. Edquist, Ed., Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Organizations, and Institutions, Pinter Publishers, London, 2001, pp. 28-49.
[8] P. Cooke, M. G. Uranga and G. Etxebarria, “Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions,” Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 4-5, 2001, pp. 475-491.
[9] M. E. Porter, “Cluster and New Economic of Competition,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1998, pp. 77-90.
[10] Ch. Lebas, et al., “Technological Natality, Firm Innovative Persistence, Sectoral Innovative Performance and International Technological Specialization,” Commissariat Général du Plan, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 1-20.
[11] B. Carlsson and R. Stankiewicz, “On the Nature Function and Composition of Technological Systems,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1991, pp. 93-118.
[12] E. Dahmen, “Developing Blocks in Industrial Economics,” Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1988, pp. 3-14.
[13] B. Carlsson, S. Jacobsson, M. Holmén and A. Rickne, “Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues,” Research Policy (Elsevier), Vol. 31, No. 2, 2002, pp. 233-245.
[14] S. Breschi and F. Malerba, “Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics and Spatial Boundaries,” In: G. Alfonso and F. Malerba, Eds., The Organisation of Economic Innovation in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 88-102.
[15] F. Malerba, and L. Orsenigo, “Technological Entry, Exit and Survival: An Empirical Analysis of Patent Data,” Research Policy, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1999, pp. 643-660. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00005-0
[16] D. B. Audretsch, “What’s New about the New Economy? Source of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2001, pp. 267-313. doi:10.1093/icc/10.1.267
[17] D. Pilat, “The Role of Technological Change in Recent Growth Patterns,” 2001.
[18] O. Grandstrand, “Toward a Theory of the TechnologicalBased Firm,” Research Policy, Vol. 27, No. 6, 1998, pp. 465-489. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00067-5
[19] P. Geroski, J. Van Reenen and C. F. Walters, “How Persistently Do Firms Innovate?” Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1997, pp. 33-48. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00903-1
[20] F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo and P. Peretto, “Persistence of Innovative Activities Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and International Technological Specialization,” International Journal of Industrial Organizational, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1997, pp. 801-821. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00012-X
[21] S. G. Winter, “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes,” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 5, No. 3-4, 1984, pp. 287-320. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0
[22] Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, “R&D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity,” In: Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, Eds., Innovation and Technological Change, An International Comparison, University of Michican Press, Ann Arbor, 1991, pp. 59-70.
[23] F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, “Schumpeterian Pattern of Innovation,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1995, pp. 47-65.
[24] F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovations Are Technology-Specific,” Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1996, pp. 451-478. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3
[25] J. Teece and G. Pisano, “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1994, pp. 537-556. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
[26] Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Technological Change,” Work Paper, Institute for Development Strategies, 2005.
[27] E. Robert, R. E. Hoskisson and L. W. Busenitz, “Market Uncertainty and Learning Distance in Corporate Entrepreneurship Entry Mode Choice,” In: M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp and D. L. Sexton, Eds., Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Integrated Mindset, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 2001, pp. 80-98.
[28] P. A. Geroski, “Entry and the Rate of Innovation,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1991, pp. 203-214. doi:10.1080/10438599100000002
[29] A. Mart?n-Marcos and J. Jaumandreu, “Entry, Exit and Productivity Growth: Spanish Manufacturing during the Eighties,” Spanish Economic Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2001, pp. 211-226.
[30] R. V. Hoed, “Sources of Radical Technological Innovation: The Emergence of Fuel Cell Technology in the Automotive Industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 11-12, 2001, pp. 1014-1021. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.032
[31] P. Aghion, N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt, “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, No. 2, 2005, pp. 701-728.
[32] J. S. Bain, “Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1956.
[33] C. Langinier, “Are Patents Strategic Barriers to Entry?” Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2004, pp. 349-361. doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2004.02.002
[34] J. K. Han, N. Kim and H. B. Kim, “Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.1.1.18133
[35] I. P. Mahmood and C. Y. Lee, “Business Groups: Entry Barrier-Innovation Debate Revisited,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2004, pp. 513-531.
[36] S. Shane and S. Venkataraman, “The Promise of EntrePreneurship as a Field of Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2002, pp. 217-221. doi:10.2307/259271
[37] J. S. Gans and S. Stern, “The Product Market and the Market for Ideas: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs,” Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2003, pp. 333-350. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8
[38] A. Young, “Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous Innovation,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No. 3, 1993, pp. 775-807. doi:10.2307/2118408
[39] G. Symeonidis, “Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypothesis and Some New Themes,” Working Papers, OECD Economic Department, 1996.
[40] F. M. Scherer, “Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem,” In: Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, Eds., Innovation and Technological Change, University of Michican Press, Ann Arbor, 1991.
[41] D. C. Mowery and N. Rosenberg, “Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511664441
[42] S. Negassi, “R&D Co-Operation and Innovation a Microeconometric Study on French Firms,” Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2004, pp. 365-384. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.010
[43] M. G. Colombo, “Firm Size and Cooperation: The DeterMinants of Cooperative Agreements in Information Technology Industries,” International Journal of the Economics and Business, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1995, pp. 3-29.
[44] M. Dogson, “Technological Collaboration in Industry,” Routledge, London, 1993.
[45] J. R. Baldwin, G. Galletly and V. Gaudreault. “Financing Innovation in New Small Firm: New Evidence from Canada,” Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 2002.
[46] T. Koga, “R&D Subsidy and Self-Financed R&D: The Case of Japanese High Technology Start-Up,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2005, pp. 53-62. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-3096-z
[47] K. H. Tsai, “R&D Productivity and Firm Size: A Nonlinear Examination,” Technovation, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2005, pp. 795-803. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.004
[48] L. B. Cardinal and T. C. Opler, “Corporate Diversification and Innovative Efficiency: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Accounting and Economic, Vol. 19, No. 2-3, 199, pp. 365-381. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00388-L
[49] W. Cohen and F. Malerba, “Is the Tendency to Variation a Chief Cause of Progress?” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2001, pp. 387-608.
[50] W. Cohen, “Empirical Studies of Innovating Activities,” In: P. Stoneman, Ed., Handbook of the Economic of Innovation and New Technology, Blackwell, Oxford, 1995.
[51] R. W. Vesson, “Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity,” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1999, pp. 367-378. doi:10.1023/A:1007727815408
[52] J. Schmookler, “Invention and Economic Growth,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[53] C. Antonelli and M. Calderini, “The Dynamic of Localized Technological Change,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 1999, pp. 97-120.
[54] Ch. Le Bas, “Demand Growth as Determinant of R&D Expenditures: A Quantitative Study at the Sectoral Level,” Revue d'économie Industrielle, Vol. 105, 2003, pp. 11-22.
[55] J. Sutton, “Schumpeter Lectures: Technology and Market Structure,” European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 3-5, 1996, pp. 511-530. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(95)00065-8
[56] F. Malerba, R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo and S. Winter, “Demand, Innovation and the Dynamic of Market Structure: A Role of Experimental Users and Divers Preference,” The 8th Schumpeter Society Conference, Manchester, June 28-2 July 2000, pp. 1-30.
[57] F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, “Innovation and Market Structure in the Dynamics of the Pharmaceutical Industry and Biotechnology: Towards a History-Friendly Model,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2002, pp. 667-703.
[58] R. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. R. Winter “Appropriating the Return from Industrial Research and Development,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1987, No. 3, 1987, pp. 783-831. doi:10.2307/2534454
[59] G. Dosi, “Technical Change and Industrial Transformation,” Macmillan Press, London, 1997.
[60] J. Lunn, “An Empirical Analyse of Product and Process Patenting: A Simulation Equation Framework,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1986, pp. 319330. doi:10.2307/2098574
[61] C. T. Koeller, “Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size: A Simulation Equation Model,” Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1995, pp. 259-269. doi:10.1002/mde.4090160308
[62] R. Winkelmann and K. F. Zimmermann, “Recent Developments in Count Data Modelling: Theory and Application,” Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.1995.tb00108.x
[63] M. Garcia-Vega, “Does Technological Diversification Promote Innovation? An Empirical Analysis for European Firms,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2006, pp. 230246. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.006
[64] J. Love and S. Roper, “The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effect,” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1999, pp. 43-64. doi:10.1023/A:1007757110963
[65] R. Drago and M. Wooden, “Union, Innovation and Investment: Australian Evidence,” Applied Economics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1994, pp. 609-615. doi:10.1080/00036849400000031
[66] M. Bhattacharya “Determinants of Innovation,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2004, pp. 155-162. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014453.94445.de
[67] D. A. Aranda, B. M. Rata and A. R. Duarte “Innovation and Firm Size: An Empirical Study for Spanish Engineering Consulting Companies,” European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2001, pp. 133141. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005671
[68] M. Rogers, “Network, Firm Size and Innovation,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2004, pp. 141-153. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69
[69] S. Shane, “Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation,” Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 9, 2001, pp. 1173-1190. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1173.9785

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.