Share This Article:

Levinthal’s Paradox Revisited, and Dismissed

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:697KB) PP. 23-32
DOI: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2012.22004    6,458 Downloads   14,703 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

This article is concerned with the so-called Levinthal’s paradox. It will be argued that many have sought a “solution” to Levinthal’s paradox, where in fact, the “solution” already appeared in Levinthal’s original articles. Most of the subsequent suggested “solutions” were inadequate solutions to a non-paradox. It is shown that the discovery of strong hydrophilic forces not only dismisses the Levintal paradox, but also provides a solution to the general problem of protein folding. A simple model based on the Markov process is presented to demonstrate how a strong biased-force can dramatically reduce the number of steps required to reach the stable native 3-D structure of the protein.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

A. Ben-Naim, "Levinthal’s Paradox Revisited, and Dismissed," Open Journal of Biophysics, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 23-32. doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2012.22004.

References

[1] W. Kauzmann, “Some Factors in the Interpretation of Protein Denaturation,” Advances in Protein Chemistry, Vol. 14, 1959, pp. 1-63. doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60608-7
[2] T. E. Creighton, “The Problem of How and Why Proteins Adopt Folded Conformation,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 89, No. 12, 1985, pp. 2452-2459. doi:10.1021/j100258a006
[3] E. Shakhnovich, “Protein Folding Thermodynamics and Dynamics: Where Physics, Chemistry and Biology Meet,” Chemistry Review, Vol. 106, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1559-1588. doi:10.1021/cr040425u
[4] L. Mirny and E. Shakhnovich, “Protein Folding Theory: From Lattice to All-Atom Models,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 361-396. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.361
[5] J. M. Shea and C. L Brooks, “From Folding Theories to Folding Proteins: A Review and Assessment of Simulation Studies of Protein Folding and Unfolding,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 52, 2001, pp. 499-535. doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.499
[6] K. A. Dill, “Polymer Principles and Protein Folding,” Protein Science, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1166-1180. doi:10.1110/ps.8.6.1166
[7] D. Kennedy and C. Norman, “What Don’t We Know?” Science, Vol. 309, No. 5731, 2005, p. 75. doi:10.1126/science.309.5731.75
[8] A. Ben-Naim, “Molecular Theory of Water and Aqueous Solutions, Part I: Understanding Water,” World Scientific, Singapore, 2009. doi:10.1142/9789812837615
[9] A. Ben-Naim, “Molecular Theory of Water and Aqueous Solutions: Part II: The Role of Water in Protein Folding Self Assembly and Molecular Recognition,” World Scientific, Singapore, 2011.
[10] G. D. Rose, P. J. Fleming, J. R. Banavar and A. Maritan, “A Backbone Based Theory of Protein Folding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol. 103, No. 45, 2006, pp. 16623-16333. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606843103
[11] C. Levinthal, “Are There Pathways for Protein Folding,” Journal de Chimie Physique, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1968, pp. 44-45.
[12] A. Ben-Naim, “Some Aspects of the Protein Folding Examined in One-Dimensional Systems,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 135, No. 8, 2011, pp. 104-115. doi:10.1063/1.3626859
[13] K. Dill, “Dominant Forces in Protein Folding,” Biochemistry, Vol. 29, 1990, pp. 7133-7155. doi:10.1021/bi00483a001
[14] R. Zwanzig, A. Szabo and B. Bagchi, “Levinthal’s Paradox,” Proceedings National Academy of Science USA, Vol. 89, No. 1, 1992 pp. 20-22.
[15] R. Dawkins, “The Blind Watchmaker,” Norton, New York, 1987.
[16] K. A. Dill, “Polymer Principles and Protein Folding,” Protein Science, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1166-1180. doi:10.1110/ps.8.6.1166
[17] R. Srinivasan and G. D. Rose, “Methinks It Is Like a Folding Curve,” Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 101-102, 2002, pp. 167-171. doi:10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00147-3
[18] P. G. Wolynes, “Energy Landscapes and Solved ProteinFolding Problems,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Vol. 363, No. 1827, 2005, pp. 453-464.
[19] J. G. Kemeny and J. L. Snell, “Finite Markov Chains,” Van Nostrand Comp. Int., New York, 1960.
[20] A. Ben-Naim, “Statistical Thermodynamics for Chemists and Biochemists,” Plenum Press, New York, 1992.
[21] C. B. Anfinsen, “Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains,” Science, Vol. 181, No. 4096, 1973, pp. 223-230. doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223
[22] K. A. Dill and H. S. Chan, “From Levinthal to Pathways to Funnels,” Nature Structural Biology, Vol. 4, 1997, pp. 10-19. doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10
[23] A. Ben-Naim, “Pitfalls in Anfinsen’s Thermodynamic Hypothesis,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 511, No. 1-3, 2011, pp. 126-128. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.05.049
[24] M. Sundaralingam and Y. C. Sekharudu, “Water-Inserted Alpha-Helical Segments Implicate Reverse Turns as Folding Intermediates,” Science, Vol. 244, No. 4910, 1989, pp. 1333-1337. doi:10.1126/science.2734612
[25] M. Sundaralingam and Y. C. Sekharudu, “A Study of Alpha-Helix Hydration in the Polypeptides,” In: R. S. Sarma and M. H. Sarma, Eds., Structure and Methods, Vol. 2, Adenine Press, 1990, pp. 115-127.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.