Share This Article:

Abnormal coronary artery angiography is not associated with adverse pregnancies outcomes

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:120KB) PP. 64-68
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2012.21012    3,011 Downloads   5,454 Views  

ABSTRACT

Background: Recently, epidemiologic studies have suggested an association between pregnancy complications and the development of coronary artery disease later in life. The current study investigate the relation between obstructive coronary versus normal coronary angiographies and the prevalence of complications during pregnancy including preeclampsia, pregnancy induced-hypertension, low birth weight, and preterm birth. Methods: All consecutive women aged <55 year, who had coronary angiography were included. Based on angiography outcome, patients were classified as normal (controls: no stenosis, wall irregularity without stenosis, or minimal calcification present) or abnormal (subjects). A standard questionnaire was sent to all participating women. The questionnaires inquired into risk factors for coronary vascular disease, in particular history of hypertensive diseases, and specific obstetric history. The results were analyzed using the unpaired t-test, the Chi-squared test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients as appropriate. A significance level of P < 0.05 was used. Results: Of the 211 consecutive women aged <55 year, 62% (n = 131) had normal coronary angiography and 38% (n = 80) abnormal coronary angiography. We found no differences of reported pregnancy complications including preeclampsia, hypertension, low birth weight, and preterm birth (combined RR = 0.70, 95% C.I. = 0.38 - 1.3) in case of abnormal coronary angiography compared to women with normal coronary angiography. The traditional risk factors hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, and diabetes were identified as the major risk factors for developing cardiovascular disease, with a relative risk ranging from 4.2 - 1.8. Conclusion: These data suggest that pregnancy complications are not an important denominator for cardiovascular disease.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

A. M. Heemskerk, M. , Ramanna, H. , W. M. Bloemenkamp, K. and J. M. de Groot, C. (2012) Abnormal coronary artery angiography is not associated with adverse pregnancies outcomes. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2, 64-68. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2012.21012.

References

[1] Graham, I., Atar, D., Borch-Johnsen, K., et al. (2008) European guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia Journal, 9, 11-59.
[2] Garovic, V.D. and Hayman, S.R. (2007) Hypertension in pregnancy: An emerging risk factor for CVD; nature clinical practice. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 3, 613-622. doi:10.1038/ncpneph0623
[3] Harskamp, R.E. and Zeeman, G.G. (2007) Preeclamspia: At risk for remote cardiovascular disease. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 334, 291-295. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3180a6f094
[4] Roberts, J.M. and Cooper, D.W. (2001) Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet, 357, 53-56. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03577-7
[5] Sattar, N. and Greer, I.A. (2002) Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: Opportunities for intervention and screening? British Medical Journal, 325, 157-160. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7356.157
[6] Williams, D. (2003) Pregnancy: A stress test for life. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15, 465-471. doi:10.1097/00001703-200312000-00002
[7] Agatisa, P.K., Ness, R.B., Roberts, J.M., Costantino, J.P., Kuller, L.H. and McLaughlin, M.K. (2004) Impairment of endothelial function in women with a history of preeclampsia: An indicator of cardiovascular risk. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 286, H1389-H1393. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00298.2003
[8] Berends, A.L., De Groot, C.J., Sijbrands, E.J., et al. (2008) Shared constitutional risks for maternal vascular-related pregnancy complications and future cardiovascular disease. Hypertension, 51, 1034-1041. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101873
[9] Hubel, C.A., Snaedal, S., et al. (2000) Dyslipoproteinaemia in postmenopausal women with a history of eclampsia. BJOG, 107, 776-784. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13340.x
[10] Manten, G.T., Sikkema, M.J., Voorbij, H.A., Visser, G.H., Bruinse, H.W. and Franx, A. (2007) Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women with a history of pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction. Hypertens Pregnancy, 26, 39-50. doi:10.1080/10641950601146574
[11] Ness, R.B., Markovic, N., Bass, D., Harger, G. and Roberts, J.M. (2003) Family history of hypertension, heart disease, and stroke among women who develop hypertension in pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102, 1366-1371. doi:10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.011
[12] Blaauw, J., Van Pampus, M.G., et al. (2006) Increased intima-media thickness after early-onset preeclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107, 1345-1351. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000218097.22464.b4
[13] [No authors listed] (2000) Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 183, S1-S22.
[14] Sibai, B., Dekker, G. and Kupferminc, M. (2005) Preeclampsia. Lancet, 365, 785-799.
[15] Smith, G.C., Pell, J.P. and Walsh, D. (2001) Pregnancy complications and maternal risk of ischaemic heart disease: A retrospective cohort study of 129290 births. Lancet, 357, 2002-2006. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05112-6
[16] Hubel, C.A., Powers, R.W., Snaedal, S., et al. (2008) C-reactive protein is elevated 30 years after eclamptic pregnancy. Hypertension, 51, 1499-1505. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.109934
[17] Sibai, B.M., Ewell, M., et al. (1997) Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 177, 1003-1010. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70004-8
[18] Valdés, G., Quezada, F., Marchant, E., et al. (2009) Association of remote hypertension in pregnancy with coronary artery disease: A case control study. Hypertension, 53, 733-738. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.127068
[19] Haukkamaa, L., Salminem, M., et al. (2004) Risk for subsequent coronary artery disease after preeclampsia. The American Journal of Cardiology, 93, 805-808. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.065
[20] Silva, L.M., Coolman, M., et al. (2008) Low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for preeclampsia: The generation R study. Journal of Hypertension, 26, 1200-1208. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fcc36e
[21] Diehl, C.L., Brost, B.C., et al. (2008) Preeclampsia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease later in life: Validation of a preeclampsia questionnaire. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 198, e11-e13. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.038
[22] Melis, F., Vandenbrouke, J.P., Büller, H.R., et al. (2004) Estimates of risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium are not influenced by diagnostic suspicion and referral basis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 191, 825-829. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.004
[23] Hermes, W., Franx, A., Van Pampus, M.G., et al. (2009) 10-Year cardiovascular event risks for women who experienced hypertensive disorders in late pregnancy: The HyRAS study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10, 28. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-28

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.