Share This Article:

Public Confidence in the Police: The Impact of Verbal Encounters

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2012.21001    3,952 Downloads   8,305 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The main part of ordinary police work consists of patrolling and answering calls, which means that most police officers are in a daily and direct contact with members of the public. During such encounters, especially if they take place by means of a telephone, language not only provides an important means to solve problems and exert social control, but it also helps to build relations, as well as to inspire confidence and trust. In this way, the communication process between police and the public provides the basis for police legitimacy and consequently, for successful police work. This article examines the impact of verbal communication between police officers and members of the public during day-to-day encounters, and shows how the linguistic and interactional choices of the police, e.g. when formulating a rejection or an-swering a request, may affect their relationship with the public in general, in positive as well as negative ways.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rønneberg, K. (2012). Public Confidence in the Police: The Impact of Verbal Encounters. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2012.21001.

References

[1] Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press.
[2] Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment”. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindstr?m, J. (Eds.), Talk in interaction—Comparative dimensions (pp. 94-123). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).
[3] Hinds, L. (2009). Public satisfaction with police: The influence of general attitudes and police-citizen encounters. International journal of police science and management, 11, 54-65. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.1.109
[4] J?nsson, L. (1988). The police interview as communicative situation. Link?ping: Link?ping University.
[5] J?nsson, L. & Linell, P. (1996). Misbelief sequences in police interviews. In: M. Thelander et al. (Eds), Samspel och variation: Spr?kliga studier till?gnade Bengt Nordberg p? 60-?rsdagen (pp. 199-208). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
[6] Luckmann, T. (1990). Social communication, dialogue and conversation. In I. Markovà, & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 45-59). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[7] Manning, P. K. (1988.) Symbolic communication. Signifying calls and the police response. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press.
[8] Riis-Johansen, M. O. (2005). The police interview as conversation. Trondheim: Hovedoppgave i anvendt spr?kvitenskap. Institutt for spr?k-og kommunikasjonsstudier, NTNU.
[9] Rosenbaum, D. P. et al. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343-365. doi:10.1177/1098611104271085
[10] R?nneberg, K. (2009). Police conversations with the public. Linguistic features which may help or hamper the communication process. Acta Humaniora No. 378, Oslo: University of Oslo.
[11] R?nneberg, K. (2011). Police Conversations with the Public. Linguistic features which may help or hamper the communication process. Unipub.
[12] R?nneberg, K., & Svennevig, J. (2010). Declining to help: Rejections in service requests to the police. Discourse & Communication, 4, 279-305.
[13] Skogan, W. G. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly, 8, 298-321. doi:10.1177/1098611104271086
[14] Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society, 16, 99-126. doi:10.1080/10439460600662098
[15] Skogan, W. G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability? Police Quarterly, 12, 301-317. doi:10.1177/1098611109339893
[16] Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[17] Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russel Sage.
[18] Weitzer, R. & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 279-296. doi:10.1177/1098611104271106
[19] Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172-185. doi:10.2307/2786750
[20] Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society, 19, 465-492. doi:10.1017/S0047404500014779
[21] Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.