%PDF-1.7
%
256 0 obj
<>
endobj
253 0 obj
<>stream
2014-06-30T13:59:47+08:00
2014-06-30T13:53:31+08:00
2014-06-30T13:59:47+08:00
Acrobat PDFMaker 11 Word 版
uuid:b20ea16c-bfec-48f3-b39d-c2c20b130227
uuid:2e21e4d5-2262-48bb-befa-be3bbab33087
62
application/pdf
Investigation of the Weldability of Austanitic Stainless Steel
This work concerns with the study of weldability of austenitic stainless steel 316 by using automatic tungsten gas shielded arc welding under various welding conditions under which it is designed to weld the samples. Results have been studied using impact and tensile strength tastings of the prepared welding joints using statistical approach. Results obtained showed that as gas flow rate of (CO2) increased the impact energy is increased, while increasing of welding current caused increasing of impact energy up to (120 ampere) then decreased. The tensile strength test results showed that as welding current is increased the tensile fracture load is decreased while increasing gas flow rate caused an increase in tensile fracture load up to 12 L/min then reduced. Microstructure examination of the weld zones did support the explanation of the variation of weld joint mechanical properties.
E. M. Anawa, M. F. Bograrah, S. B. Salem
Adobe PDF Library 11.0
Weldability, Austenitic Stainless, Impact Energy, Tensile Strength
D:20140630055323
This work concerns with the study of weldability of austenitic stainless steel 316 by using automatic tungsten gas shielded arc welding under various welding conditions under which it is designed to weld the samples. Results have been studied using impact and tensile strength tastings of the prepared welding joints using statistical approach. Results obtained showed that as gas flow rate of (CO2) increased the impact energy is increased, while increasing of welding current caused increasing of impact energy up to (120 ampere) then decreased. The tensile strength test results showed that as welding current is increased the tensile fracture load is decreased while increasing gas flow rate caused an increase in tensile fracture load up to 12 L/min then reduced. Microstructure examination of the weld zones did support the explanation of the variation of weld joint mechanical properties.
endstream
endobj
199 0 obj
<>
endobj
252 0 obj
<>
endobj
334 0 obj
<>
endobj
335 0 obj
<>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
79 0 obj
<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
135 0 obj
<>/Font<>/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
147 0 obj
<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
336 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>>
endobj
337 0 obj
[358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R 368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R 371 0 R 372 0 R 373 0 R 374 0 R 375 0 R]
endobj
338 0 obj
<>stream
HWM7ϯez]-\B` v̒