d water table dropped by 12 to 15 m in deep wells in the affected area. It covered an area of 37.31 km² (12.36%) in 1998 which reduced to 24.12 km² (7.69%) in 2010. Overall, loss of 13.19 km² of cultivated land is observed. Decline in water table is another reason which has affected agriculture land leading to shrinkage in its area.

As far as village level analysis goes, all the nine villages which were surveyed have reported a reduction in area under cultivated land. The decrease is 68.90 ha in Sadra, 45.05 ha in Lalrai, 6.23 ha in Gurha kalyansingh14.04 ha in Dungli, 8.49 ha in Padarla, 23.19 ha in Mirgeshwar, 15.39 in Biliya, 4.89 in Karanwa.

Dense Forest

Dense forests have a characteristic dark red tone and dark green tone, smooth texture and are irregular in shape. In the study area, dense forest is present on the hill slopes in south-western part. Dense forest covers major part of the watershed in south west part. In 1998, it covered 90.09 km² (28.75%). In a span of another 12 years, it has decreased to 72.94 (23.87%) in 2010. The decrease in area under open forest can be attributed to anthropogenic activities, livestock pressure and change in climate. The generally high temperatures and low precipitation has led to the depletion of vegetation cover. Open forest has progressively become thinner and less continuous in the last decade because of anthropogenic activities including population pressure.

Villagers generally uses fuel wood for cooking purpose, and unrestricted cutting of wood is also responsible for forest depletion and degradation. Increase in the frequency of droughts, occurring once in three years now, has affected the land use/land cover of the area in every aspect, quantitively as well as qualitatively.

Open forest

Open forest category can be identified from its dark red to medium red tone, irregular shape and medium texture. Open forests are found in western and northwestern areas and are associated with the areas nearer the dense forests. Open forest occupied 25.12 km2 (8.13%) in 1998 which increased up to 32.74 km² (11.42%) in 2010. An increase of area under open forest by about 4.14 km² (2.58%) has been observed. This increase might be due to the loss in density (canopy cover) of dense forest which converted into open forest in due course of time because of decreased rainfall and anthropogenic activities.

Uncultivated land

Uncultivated land is identified by light grey and dark greenish tone within cropped area (red color), regular shape and medium texture. In the study area, such fallow lands are to be found well distributed in the central and south-eastern portions. During field survey it was noted that much of the land which was under cultivation before 6 - 7 years are lying barren because of decline in rainfall. Even if irrigation water is economically used, nearly 80% - 90% of the arid area may not have access to water supply through irrigation. Area under uncultivated

Figure 3. Land use/land cover of Mithri watershed of (a) 1998 and (b) 2010 with village boundary.

Table 1. Land use/cover changes in the Mithri Watershed.

Table 2. Land use/land cover change statistics at village level in Mithri watershed.

Note: area in hectares.

land in 1998 was 38.36 km² (13.97%) which increased to 49.23 km2 (16.56%) in 2010. Villages which show increase in uncultivated land include Sadra (130.73 ha), Lalrai (44.64 ha), Gurha Kalyansingh (11.77 ha), Mirgeshwar (23.93 ha), Biliya (26.22 ha) and Karanwa (10.69 ha).

Wasteland

Wasteland occupied an area of about 58.78 km² (18.11%) in 1998 which increased to 71.75 km2 (23.16) in 2010. Prolonged droughts have induced severe decrease in vegetation cover and caused changes in the composition of the herbage layer as reflected by the increase in Angrezi babul. Depletion of Ground water level, and decline in rainfall triggered the conversion of cultivated land into uncultivated land leading to wasteland.

Among the surveyed villages wasteland has increased by 182.16 ha in Sadra, 156.35 ha in Lalrai, 10.82 ha Gurha kalyansigh, 1.78 ha in Dungli, 43.31 ha in Biliya, 33.91 ha in Mirgeshwar, 4.69 ha in Karanwa.

Open Scrub

Open scrub is the characteristic land cover present in arid and semi-arid areas. Thin veneer of soil cover supports scrubs and grass or devoid of vegetation where surface erosion is dominant. These lands are subjected to degradation or erosion and consist mainly of thorny bushes. Such areas were identified from their yellowish tone and their association with uplands, and their irregular shapes. Open scrub has increased from 34.04 km² to 38.18 km² (3.41%) from 1998 to 2010. This increase in area under open scrub points towards land degradation occurring in the area as more of area has converted into unproductive land.

Open scrub has increased by 48.55 ha in Sadra, 37.94 ha in Lalrai, 5.84 ha in Gurha kalyansingh, 10.52 ha in Padarla, 66.90 ha in Mirgeshwar, 9.05 ha in Karanwa.

Water bodies and River channel

Recurring droughts adversely affected the surface water resources. As the water resource in the region is dependent on the scanty and erratic rainfall, the duration of availability of water in water bodies gets drastically reduced in drought years. Mithri River has remained dry for the past 10 - 11 years. Dry river channel area increased from 7.42 km² (2.36%) to 8.10km² (2.5%) from 1998 to 2010 period. Surface water body area also decreased to 0.70 km² (0.22%) because of drying up of a reservoir and other smaller surface water bodies.

The water features appear black in tone in the satellite imagery and dry river is white in tone. Area of dry River increased by 14.87 ha in Sadra, 10.59 ha in Padarla, 5.40 ha in Mirgeshwar and 2.39 ha in Biliya. Surface water body area decreased in 2010 because of drying up of check dam in the northern part of the watershed and other surface water bodies. Water body in Sadra decreased by 7.76 ha and the kot dam which comes under Lalrai got completely dry with a loss in of 91.95 ha surface water body in Lalrai village and 3.79 ha in Biliya village.

Other land cover/land use

Built up area has increased from 2.67 km² (0.85) to 4.34 km² (1.38%), primarily due to growth in Bali town. Built-up land increased by 14.85 ha in Sadra, 11.05 ha in Lalrai, 1.50 ha in Gurha Kalyansingh, 5.03 ha in Padarala, 3.55 ha in Mirgeshwar, 3.03 ha in Biliya, 8.01 ha in Karanwa, indicating more demand for residential land due to growth in population.

5. Village Level Household Survey

Aggregated to the village-level, household data offer an additional perspective to the remotely sensed land-cover dynamics. The village profiles provide a crosscheck on the dynamics observed by remote sensing, and can be related to remotely sensed landscape variables [13] [23] . Individual household data allow for a better understanding of the land-use practices each village, as most land-use decisions are made by individuals and households. Only when the physical (land use/land cover change) study and the social (socio-economic survey), are analysed together, a more complete picture of the environmental change can be Land use at village level is thought to be the most integrated information on how people recognize, utilize, manage and govern land resources, and the most important basis of their livelihood systems [24] . The interaction between land cover/use change and livelihoods is an important theme for understanding the issue of rural poverty in human-environment relationships [25] .

To assess the impacts of land degradation on agriculture a household level survey was carried out in 8 villages of the watreshed, using structured questionnaires, besides group discussion and PRA were also conducted. The eight villages selected are Biliya, Ghura Kalyansingh, Padrala, Sadra, Lalrai, Doongli, Mirgeshwar, and Karanwa.

5.1. Socio-Economic Condition

Results of survey revealed the deteriorating condition of land/soil which has severely affected the rainfed agriculture. The prime reason of land degradation is the persistent decrease in rainfall as elaborated by the villagers and elderly farmers. The survey shows 95% of people are engaged in agriculture and related activities and casual labour for their livelihood. Remaining 5% has government service and took up some private jobs like driving, cooking etc. People from villages like Biliya (80%), Sadra (94%), Karanwa (64%), Lalrai (38%) depends heavily on livestock for livelihood, sell dairy products in nearby market and rear sheep’s wool. The Average annual income of the people in the surveyed villages ranges from 35000 to little more than 45000. 19% of people have annual income less than 35000, 32% have annual income of 35000 - 45000 and 49% falls in the income group more than 45000 (Table 3).

5.2. Agriculture: Facts and Figures

Most of the farmers are small and marginal who grow crops for self consumption. About 60% of the farmers possess agricultural lands that are rain fed. Many farmers though having large land holding size but due to limited quantity of water and poor yield in the tube wells they are only able to cultivate few hectares of their land, leaving large tracts of land at the mercy of nature.

Table 3. Socio-economic status of the villages surveyed.

Note: area in hectares, fw-fuel wood, LPG-liquid petroleum gas.

Common crops grown in the area comprise maize, green pea, sesame, sorghum bicolor, mustard seeds, black eyed pea and pearl millet which require less water. Wheat is grown where sufficient water is available for irrigation. Agriculture production in the villages has declined by 30% - 40%, during the last two decades due to frequently occurring drought, decreased rainfall and gradually falling water table. Farmers having 50 - 80 bighas of land are unable to produce good output due to unavailability of water for irrigation. The main sources of irrigation in the area are wells (47%), tube wells (47%) and tanks (6%). It was reported that 20 years back water table was at 60 - 70 feet, now it has gone down to 170 feet; and in Biliya even up to 200 feet has been reported.

Survey found dozens of well have dried up, and people are unable to afford the cost of drilling the wells to greater depths. Only rich farmers have installed tube wells in their fields, and also reap the benefits of government subsidies. To arrest soil erosion, only 10% farmers practice bunding and contouring, rest 90% leave their land as such. Some farmers also told about the increase in level of sands in their fields. Besides, Desi babool (Acacia nilotica) there is widespread increase in Angrezi babool (Prospis Juliflora) and other cactus plant during the last two decades which is eating away the top layer of the soil. Problem of termite was reported from Sela village, where farmers complain that their produce is destroyed in the field if they leave it even for two days.

About 80% of farmers have reported decrease in fertility of soil in their fields because of low rainfall and no irrigation facilities. Other factors as reported include destruction of crops by Blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Dungli and termites in Gurhakalyansingh.

Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and Group discussion:

Participatory Rural appraisal is an effective tool to elicit people’s perception about an issue. PRA and group discussion were conducted at several villages during the survey and it was observed that farmers having 70 - 80 bighas of land are unable to produce good output due to non-availability of water. Earlier people used to sell their extra produce, now they have to buy some quantities of food grain to fulfil their family needs. Farmers have now switched to crops which require less water like maize, moong, jowar, and raida, in place of cotton and gram.

People report of substantially decreased and erratic rainfall, and increased temperature. Ponds, river lets and dams have all dried up. Very few of the farmers have ensured their crops. On an average agriculture yield has decreased by 40%, but the people who could not avail the irrigation facility have reported decrease in yield of about less than half. 82% people hold responsible the decreasing rainfall for their reduced agriculture yields (Table 4). Other factors as reported include destruction of crops by Blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Dungli and termites in Gurhakalyansingh.

Table 4. Decline in water table, change in crops yield and pattern.

Figure 4. Satellite images.

Table 5. Fall in depth to water table.

Source: Ground water department, Pali.

The natural fluctuation of the water table in the Pali region reflects the seasonal distribution of the rainfall. Depth of water level ranges from 60 in plain areas to 120 feet in hilly region, because of recurrence of drought and decline in rainfall in the last two decades water level has gone down to 50 - 60 feet. People reported that 1990 year was a year of good rainfall (1231.6 mm) in the last two decades, during which ground water table rose upto 50 feet. Agriculture production has been good during the 1990-1996 period. Drought of moderate intensity occurred in 1999, followed by severe drought in 2002 and 2008. The year 2009 and 2010 were years of good rainfall, which has led to rise in water table and good crop production.

Soil degradation

Surface reflectance of soil changes as a result of exposed lower horizon or deposition of alleviated material. There is a high correlation between soil reflectance and several properties such as mineralogy, organic matter content, moisture content, colour and soluble soil content [26] . The remote sensing data could be used efficiently in delineating areas affected by soil degradation.

Satellite Images of 1998 and 2010 show variations in spectral reflectance of various soil type and its degradation (Figure 4). Kot reservoir (encircled with red colour) in 1998 image appears dark because of availability of water; the same Kot reservoir is seen dried-up in 2010 image and has almost vanished. Land adjacent to Kot dam also appears white because of alkalization of soil. Repeated use of underground water at deeper levels having high PPM of fluoride and continual use of DAP, urea, pesticide, insecticide in view of increasing the productivity of land has actually led to increased alkalization of cultivated land to more than pH of more than 8.5. Pockets of land/soil having bright white tone can be seen scattered in northern part and to the right bank of the dried Mithri River.

Ground water depth and its quality play an important role in salinization/alkalization of soils in arid and semi-arid areas; hence watertable depth, its salt concentration and composition are considered key elements in the appraisal, monitoring and amelioration of the salt-affected lands [27] .

In the arid and semi-arid regions, irrigation is necessary for agricultural production. Table 5 presents the increase in depth to water table in the villages falling in watershed, in 1998-2010 (Ground Water Department, Pali), showing average decrease of 41 feet.

Farmers are forced to extract water from deep wells with high salt content to irrigate their land. While excess water application may cause rising of water table, it can also cause increase of soil salinity. Because of erratic nature of rainfall farmers, have no alternative but to use low-quality water for irrigation, disregarding completely future consequences of likely soil salinity [28] .

6. Conclusions

Land use/land cover analysis of study area clearly reflects light on the ongoing land degradation because of decreased rainfall and anthropogenic activities. Major changes that have been recorded include degradation of dense forest, conversion of cultivated land to uncultivated land owing to decline in rainfall and depletion of ground water resources, and increase in wasteland. The land degradation has consequently affected the socio- economic condition of the people in villages badly. People are forced to stop cultivation in their agricultural land because of increased cost of irrigation, switching off to other crops of low economic value, and have to pay heavily for fertilizers and pesticides because of increased pest attacks. Some of the farmers have to migrate to other states in search of other means of livelihood.

Such kind of studies gives a deeper insight of the problem faced by the people living in such conditions. And unless informed of the problems, how can these be resolved and brought to the attention of the government?

Acknowledgements

The financial support received from University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi under Major Research Project 33-49/2007 (SR) to the senior author is thankfully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to the Chairman, Department of Geology, A.M.U., Aligarh for providing necessary infrastructure facilities. Sincere thanks to Society for Sustainable development, Karauli, for assisting in household surveys in the study area. Thanks are also due to Dr. Yousuf Khanday, Dr. Subha Rais and Dr. Sana Iftekhar for their help in data generation and analysis.

Cite this paper

Sayema Jamal,Akram Javed,Yousuf Khanday, (2016) Evaluation of Land Degradation and So-cio-Environmental Issues: A Case Study of Semi Arid Watershed in Western Rajasthan. Journal of Environmental Protection,07,1132-1147. doi: 10.4236/jep.2016.78102

References

  1. 1. UNCCD (1994) United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa. A/AC.241/27, Paris.

  2. 2. Reynolds, J.F. and Stafford-Smith, M. (2002) Global Desertification: Do Humans Create Deserts? In: Stafford-Smith, M. and Reynolds, J.F., Eds., Do Humans Create Deserts? Dahlem University Press, Berlin, 1-22.

  3. 3. Coxhead, I. and Oygard, R. (2008) Land Degradation. Copenhagen Consensus.

  4. 4. Beinroth, F.H., Eswaran, H., Reich, P.F. and Van Den Berg, E. (1994) Land Related Stresses. In: Virmani, S.M., Katyal, J.C., Eswaran, H. and Abrol, I.P., Eds., Stressed Eco-Systems and Sustainable Agriculture, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

  5. 5. Diouf, A. and Lambin, E.F. (2001) Monitoring Land-Cover Changes in Semi-arid Regions: Remote Sensing Data and Field Observations in the Ferlo, Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments, 48, 129-148.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jare.2000.0744

  6. 6. Quattrochi, D.A. and Goodchild, M.F. (1997) Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Lewis Publishers, New York.

  7. 7. Quiring, S.M. and Papakryiakou, T.N. (2003) An Evaluation of Agricultural Drought Indices for the Canadian Praires. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118, 49-62.

  8. 8. Liu, J.G. (2001) Integrating Ecology with Human Demography, Behaviour, and Socioeconomics: Needs and Approaches. Ecological Modeling, 140, 1-8.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00265-4

  9. 9. Veldkamp, A. and Lambin, E.F. (2001) Predicting Land Use Change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85, 1-6.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00199-2

  10. 10. Parker, D.C., Manson, S.M., Janssen, M.A., Hoffmann, M.J. and Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-Agent System Models for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 314-337.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302004

  11. 11. Walsh, S.J. and Welsh, W.F. (2003) Approaches for Linking People, Place and Environment for Human Dimensions Research. Geocarto International, 18, 51-61.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106040308542281

  12. 12. Walsh, S.J., Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R.R., Shao, Y., Weiss, D.J., McDaniel, P.M. and Pullen, R.E. (2003) Characterizing Land Use/Land Cover Change in Northeast Thailand and Analyzing the Causes and Consequences of Landscape Dynamics. Proceedings of 30th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Honolulu, Hawaii.

  13. 13. Walsh, S.J., Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R.R. and Page, P.H. (2006) Spatial Simulation Modeling of Land Use/Land Cover Change Scenarios in Northeastern Thailand: A Cellular Automata Approach. Journal of Land Use Science, 1, 5-28.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17474230600604213

  14. 14. Entwisle, B., Walsh, S.J., Rindfuss, R.R. and Chamratrithirong, A. (1998) Land-Use/Land-Cover and Population Dynamics, Nang Rong, Thailand. In: Liverman, D., Moran, E.F., Rindfuss, R.R., Geoghegan, J. and Stern, P.C., Eds., People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 121-144.

  15. 15. Mertens, B. and Lambin, E.F. (2000) Land-Cover Change Trajectories in Southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 90, 467-494.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00205

  16. 16. Guyer, J.I. and Lambin, E.F. (1993) Land-Use in an Urban Hinterland: Ethnography and Remote Sensing in the Study of African Intensification. American Anthropologist, 95, 839-859.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00040

  17. 17. Behrens, C.A., Baksh, M.G. and Mothes, M. (1994) A Regional Analysis of Bari Land-Use Intensification and Its Impact on Landscape Heterogeneity. Human Ecology, 22, 279-316.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02168854

  18. 18. Sussman, R.W., Sussman, L.K. and Green, G.M. (1994) Satellite Imagery, Human Ecology, Anthropology, and Deforestation in Madagascar. Human Ecology, 22, 333-354.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02168856

  19. 19. Moran, E. and Brondizio, E. (1998) Land-Use Change after Deforestation in Amazonia. In: Liverman, D., Moran, E., Rindfuss, R. and Stern, P., Eds., People and Pixels, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 45-67.

  20. 20. Kobayashi, T., Nakayama, S., Wang, L.M., Li, G.Q. and Yang, J. (2005) Socio-Ecological Analysis of Desertification in the Mu-Us Sandy Land with Satellite Remote Sensing. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 1, 17-24.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11355-005-0003-3

  21. 21. Boschetto, R.G., Mohamed, R.M. and Arrigotti, J. (2010) Vulnerability to Desertification in a Sub-Saharan Region: A First Local Assessment in Five Villages of Southern Region of Malawi. Italian Journal of Agronomy/Rivista di Agronomia, 3, 91-101.

  22. 22. Pirmoradi, A.H., Hosseini, S.M. and Hosseini, S.J.F. (2011) Effective Parameters on Farmers’ Participation in Plans to Combat Desertification (PCDs). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 5582-5590.

  23. 23. Fernandes, M.F., Barbosa, M.P. and Neto, J.M.M. (2012) Analysis of Levels of Land Degradation Using Landsat-5, Municipalities of Araripina (PE) Crato and Barbalha (CE) and Marcolandia (PI), Brazil. Soil and Water Engineering, International Conference of Agricultural Engineering-CIGR-AgEng 2012: Agriculture and Engineering for a Healthier Life, Valencia, 8-12 July 2012.

  24. 24. Mertens, B., Sunderlin, W.D., Ndoye, O. and Lambin, E.F. (2000) Impact of Macroeconomic Change on Deforestation in South Cameroon: Integration of Household Survey and Remotely-Sensed Data. World Development, 28, 983-999.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00007-3

  25. 25. Saphangthong, T. and Kono, Y. (2009) Continuity and Discontinuity in Land Use Changes: A Case Study in Northern Lao Villages. (Special Issue: Land Use Changes in the Uplands of Southeast Asia: Proximate and Distant Causes). Southeast Asian Studies, 47, 263-286.

  26. 26. Ueda. G. (2011) Land Subdivision and Land Use Change in the Frontier Settlement Zone of Mount Meru, Tanzania. African Study Monographs, 42, 101-118.

  27. 27. Chandio, F.A. Soomro, A.G., Memon, A.H. and Talpur, M.A. (2011) Influence of Watertable Depth on Soil Sodicity and Salinity. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, 5, 416-420.

  28. 28. Sadeh, A. and Ravina, I. (2000) Relationships between Yield and Irrigation with Low-Quality Water D a System Approach. Agricultural Systems, 64, 99-113.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00016-0

Journal Menu>>