Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
Advances in Chemical Engi neering and Science , 20 1 1, 1, 45-50 doi:10.4236/aces.2011.12008 Published Online April 2011 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/aces) Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES Effects of Molar Ratio, Alkali Catalyst Concentration and Temperature on Transesterification of Jatropha Oil with Methanol under Ultrasonic Irradiation Amish P. Vyas, Jaswant L. Verma, Nandula Subrahmanyam Chemical Engineering Department, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India E-mail: Amish71in@yahoo.com Received December 28, 2010; revised March 10, 2011; accepted March 21, 2011 Abstract For transesterification of Jatropha oil into biodiesel, ultrasound assisted transesterification seems to be prom- ising in terms of reduction in process time and stages of operation. Effects of process variables such as the catalyst loading, the molar ratio of methanol to oil, reaction temperature and the reaction time were investi- gated on the conversion of Jatropha oil to biodiesel. The conversion was above 93% under the conditions of 50˚C, methanol to oil molar ratio of 9:1, reaction time 30 min and catalyst amount (catalyst/oil) of 1% wt%. A kinetic study of transesterification of Jatropha oil based on ultrasound assisted synthesis is presented in this paper. Rate equation obtained is also presented. Keywords: Transesterification; Ultrasound; Triglyceride; Jatropha Oil, Alkali Catalyst 1. Introduction Vehicular pollutant emissions caused by the combustion of fossil fuels and crude oil price fluctuations brought into focus the need for developing alternate fuels which could create less pollution, produced from renewable feedstocks and operate without much modification in the existing design of the engine. Biodiesel (fatty acid alkyl ester) derive d f rom transesteri fication of vegetable oils or an animal fat with methanol (Figure 1) is a potential substitute for petroleum based diesel fuels. Even 5% re- placement of petroleum fuel by biofuel can save a coun- try like India Rs. 4000 crores per year in foreign ex- change [1]. Government of India has already given due impor- tance to biofuel and announced a National Biofuel policy in year 2006. The focus is on collection and distribution of renewable feedstocks for biofuel products and R & D at pilot plant scale and later scaling upto commercial lev- Figure 1. Transesterification of triglycerides with alcohol. el technologies for production of biodiesel using Jatropha oil and Karanja oil. At present, the biodiesel is usually produced by reacting methanol and a vegetable oil in a batch stirred tank reactor using a liquid alkaline catalyst. Ultrasound assisted transesterification process offers a number of advantages over current technology, namely the simplification of the process and downstream separa- tion. The present study involved transesterification of Jatropha oil with methanol catalyzed by alkali catalyst. Effects of various parameters were studied. 2. Ultrasound Technology Influence of ultrasound on transesterification reaction is of purely physical nature. Formation of fine emulsion between oil and al cohol due t o microt urbulence ge nerated by cavitation bubbl es generates enormous interfacial area, which accelerates the reaction [2]. Ultrasound is the process of propagation of the compression waves with frequencies above the range of human hearing. Ultra- sound frequency ranges from 20 kHz to l0 MHz, with associated acoustic wavelengths in liquids of about 100- 0.15 mm. These wavelengths are not on the scale of mo- lecular dimensions. Instead, the chemical effects of ul- trasound derive from several nonlinear acoustic phe- nomena, of which cavitation is the most important. Acoustic cavitation is the formation, growth, and implo- A. P. VYAS ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES 46 sive collapse of bubbles in a liquid irradiated with sound or ultrasound. When sound passes through a liquid, it consists of expansion (negative pressure) waves and compression (positive pressure) waves. These cause bubbles (which are filled with both solvent and solute vapour and with previously dissolv ed gases) to grow and recompress. Under proper conditions, acoustic cavitation can lead to implosive co mpression in such cavities. Such implosive bubble collapse produ ces inten s e local h eating, high pressures, and very short life-times. Cavitation is an extraordinary method of concentrating the diffused en- ergy of sound into a chemically useab le form. Ultrasoni- cation provides the mechanical energy for mixing and the required activation energy for initiating the transesterifi- cation reaction. Low-frequency ultrasonic irradiation is useful tool for emulsification of immiscible liquids. The collapse of the cavitation bubbles disrupts the phase boundary and causes emulsification, by ultrasonic jets that impinge one liquid on another [3,4]. Effect of low -frequency ultrasound was studied on the production of biodiesel v ia transesterification of Jatropha oil with methanol using sodium hydroxide as homoge- neous catalyst. 3. Experimental Work 3.1. Reagents and Materials Methanol (99.5%) and sodium hydroxide (98%) pur- chased from Yash Enterprise, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Jatropha oil was purchased from Nidhita marketing, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Properties of purchased Jat- ropha oil as carried out at Nirma University are shown in Table 1. 3.2. Transesterification Procedure Methanol and Jatropha oil were used as a raw material to study the eff ect of low fr equency ultr asound on biodiesel production at 303 K, 313 K, 323 K using molar ratio of oil to methanol ranging from 1:3, 1:6, 1:9 and 1:12, and the quantity of alkali catalyst from 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2% (wt/wt) of the weight of Jatropha oil. The reac- tion mixture consists of Jatropha oil, methanol, and so- dium hydroxide. Sodium hydroxide was dissolved into methanol followed by addition of Jatropha oil to the so- lution. Since, the Jatropha oil and methanol were not Table 1. Properties of Jatropha oil. Property Value Acid value (mg KOH/gm) 6.171 Saponification value (mg/ g) 198.5 Iodine value (mg iodine/g) 227 Free fatty acid 3.0855 Viscosity (mm2/s) 47 completely miscible, two layers were observed: the up- per layer was of methanol and the lower layer was of oil. Reaction mixture was taken in conical flask and it is placed into water bath of Toshniwal Ultrasonic Cleaner (30 kHz frequency), which was used for ultrasonication, after achieving desired reaction temperature of water in ultrasonic cleaner. During reaction under ultrasound ir- radiation, no external stirring is provided. The mixing took place due to the effect of ultrasound wave mecha- nism in water-bath. The reaction mixture was kept for the predecided reaction time under ultrasonic effect and then taken for centrifugation at 1800 to 2000 rpm using laboratory centrifuge. Later the mixture was allowed to settle in separating funnel to get two separate layers of biodiesel and glycerine. Separation of biodiesel and glycerine was done using a separating funnel. Water wash was given to the separated biodiesel to remove wa- ter soluble impurities and then dried to remove moisture by putting under calcination. 4. Results and Discussion 4.1. Properties of Biodiesel Biodiesel produced was analyzed and compared with the fuel properties of petro-diesel as per ASTM Standards (Table 2). The Jatr opha oil, however, was found to have much higher values of fuel properties, especially kine- matic viscosity (Table 1), restricting the direct use as a fuel in diesel engine. After transesterification, the kine- matic viscosity value reduced to permissible limit. The flash points were in a limit of safe storage and handling conditions. The pour point and cloud points were little higher than petro-diesel. This might be due to presence of wax, which begins to crystallize with the decrease in temperature. This problem could be solved by using blend of biodiesel with petro-diesel. 4.2. Influence of Reaction Parameters Experiments were carried out by changing different process parameters. Table 2. Comparison fuel properties of petro-diesel, bio- diesel and ASTM D6751. Fuel properties Petro-diesel Biodiesel (B100) ASTM D6751 Specific gravity at 15°C 0.846 0.875 0.86 - 0.90 Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) at 40 °C 1.9 - 6.0 4.756 4 - 6 Flash Point (°C) Minimum 1 30 165 100 - 170 Cloud Point (°C) –5 –3 –3 to 12 Pour Point (°C) –10 –8 –15 to 10 Cetane number Minimum 47 54.25 48 - 65 A. P. VYAS ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES 47 4.2.1. Methanol to Oil Molar Ratio Stoichiometrically, the methanolysis of Jatropha oil re- quires three moles of methanol for each mole of oil. Since, transesterification of triglycerides is reversible reaction; excess methanol is requ ired to shift the equilib- rium towards the direction of ester formation. As can be seen from Figure 2 (at 303 K) and Figure 3 (at 323 K), the maximum conversion was achieved at methanol to oil molar ratio 9:1. It is comparable to the work carried out by H. D. Hanh et al. [5] obtained 90% conversion using methanol as an alcohol with triolein oil to alcohol molar ratio of 1:6 and KOH as a catalyst. D. Kumar et. al. [6] have obtained above 98% yield using 1:9 Jatropha oil to methanol molar ratio and heterogeneous solid catalyst used was Na/SiO2. Present study shows that with molar ratio of oil to methanol of 1:12, maximum conversion was achieved in 30 minutes only and after that it almost a constant over an extended reaction time. Molar ration of 1:3 and 1:6 are not showing good results. One of the reasons for the same may be the predominance of esteri- fication reaction at the initial phase, to transesterify the FFA present in the Jatropha oil, of transesterification which can consume methanol present in the reaction mixture and hence, the amount of methanol available for transesterification may not be sufficient to drive the reac- tion forward for longer time. 4.2.2. Amount of Catalyst Effect of variation of amount of catalyst on conversion was also studied. Catalyst amount was varied in the range of 0.5% to 2.5% (wt/wt of the oil taken). As shown in Figure 4, the conversion increased firstly with the increase of catalyst amount from 0.5% to 1.5%. But, with further increase in the catalyst amount from 1.5% to 2.5%, the convers ion decreased due to soap for mation. D. Kumar et al. [6] obtained their best result at 3% wt% catalyst amount which is higher than the present study. Separation of heterogeneous catalyst is adding one more stage in the process presented by D. Kumar. H. D. Hanh et al. [5] obtained about 90% conversion with 1% wt% of NaOH catalyst. The conversion obtained by them is less than what obtained in present study using same amount of catalyst. 4.2.3. Reaction Time and Temperature Figure 5 shows the conversion versus reaction time at different temperatures. It could be seen from the plot that the conversion increased in the reaction time range of 10 to 45 minutes with the increase in tempera ture, and th ere after remained nearly constant as a representative of a nearby equilibrium conversion. The nearly equilibrium conversion was found to be about 93.5% at 45 minutes of reaction time. Effect of reaction temperature is not stud- ied by D. Kumar et al. [6] using heterogeneous solid Figure 2. Effect of molar ratio on conversion of triglyceride at 303 K. Reaction conditions: Jatropha oil 50 g, catalyst amount 1%. Figure 3. Effect of molar ratio on conversion of triglyceride at 323 K. Reaction conditions: Jatropha oil 50 g, catalyst amount 1%. Figure 4. Effect of amount of catalyst on triglyceride conversion. Reaction conditions: Jatropha oil 50 g, Oil to Methanol Molar Ratio 1:9, Reaction time 30 min for 323 K and 45 min for 303 K. catalyst but results published (Table 5) for feedstocks other than Jatropha oil shows that reaction time obtained in present study is at par w ith other published results. 5. Reaction Kinetics Experiments were carried out at three different tempera- A. P. VYAS ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES 48 Figure 5. Effect of reaction temperature on triglyceride conversion. Reaction conditions: Jatropha oil 50 g, catalyst amount 1%, Oil to Methanol Molar Ratio 1:9. tures 303 K, 313 K and 323 K. It could be seen from Figure 5 that with increase in reaction temperature con- version also increased. The overall rate equation (k) can be found using (1) for first order reaction and (2) for second order reaction. ln 1t Α kX (1) ln 1t Ao ΑΑ kCX X (2) where XA is the conversion of triglyceride. The experimental data collected at 303 K, 313 K and 323 K were tested for 1st order kinetics (Figures 6 to 8 and Ta ble 3) and 2nd order kinetics (Figures 9 to 11, and Table 3). The experimental data fitted well for 1st order kinetics. The rate data collected were subjected to Ar- henius equation as follows: 0exp kk ΕRΤ (3) 0 ln ln kΕRΤk (4) Figure 6. Plot of –ln(1 – XA) vs time, t (minutes) at 323 K assuming first order reaction. Rate constant k = 0.091 min-1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. Table 3. Reaction rate constant k (min–1) at different tem- peratures for first order and second order reactions as- sumption, respectively. Order of Reaction (Assumed) Reaction Temperature, K Rate Constant, k R 2 First 303 0.06 min–1 0.944 313 0.075 min–1 0.967 323 0.091 min–1 0.974 Second 303 353.10 ml/mol*min–1 0.807 313 447.96 ml/mol*min–1 0.807 323 534.92 ml/mol*min–1 0.807 Figure 7. Plot of –ln(1 – XA) vs time, t (minutes) at 313 K assuming first order reaction. Rate constant k = 0.075 min–1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. Figure 8. Plot of –ln(1 – XA) vs time, t (minutes) at 303 K assuming first order reaction. Rate constant k = 0.06 min–1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. where, E is activation energy, R is the gas constant (J/mol-K), T is an absolute temperature, and k0 is a fre- quency facto r . From the plot of lnk versus 1/T (Figure 12, Table 4), –E/R = Slope of the graph = –2039. Therefore, Activa- tion energy E = 2039 × 1.987 = 4051.49 cal/mol, and lnk0 = 3.918 k0 = 50.30 A. P. VYAS ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES 49 Table 4. Database for determination of activation energy. Reaction Temperature, T (K) 1/T Rate Constant, k (min–1) lnk 303 0.0033 0.06 min–1 –2.81341 313 0.0031950.075 –2.59027 323 0.0030960.091 –2.3969 Rate equation derived from the above data of activa- tion energy for the ultrasound assisted transesterification reaction is: dd 1 AAAo Α rXtkC X (5) where, 0expkk ΕRΤ Substituting the values of k0, E and R in (3) and also substituting (3) in (5) the rate equation for the reaction is: 50.30exp4051.49 1.9871 AAo Α rC TX (6) 6. Conclusions Ultrasound assisted transesterification reaction for the production of biodiesel was found to be very promising from the results obtained. The optimum conditions for the production of biodiesel from Jatropha oil under the full ultrasound condition were molar ratio of oil to methanol of 1:9 with NaOH concentration of 1 wt% and reaction time of 30 min. Increasing reaction time and temperature as well as the molar ratio contributes to high conversion of triglyceride. The transesterification of Jatropha oil un- der ultrasound condition provides a possibility for pro- ducing cheap alternative fuels, which will reduce pollu- tion and protect the environment. The conversion is com- parable to the results reported by C. Stavarache et al. [7] Figure 9. Plot of –ln[XA/(1 – XA)] vs time, t (minutes) at 323 K assuming second order reaction. CAo = 0.00075899 mol/ml. Rate constant k = 534.92 ml/mol*min–1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. Figure 10. Plot of –ln[XA/(1 – XA)] vs time, t (minutes) at 313 K assuming second order reaction. CAo = 0.00075899 mol/ml. Rate constant k = 447.96 ml/mol*min–1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. Figure 11. Plot of –ln[XA/(1 – XA)] vs time, t (minutes) at 303 K assuming second order reaction. CAo = 0.00075899 mol/ml. Rate constant k = 353.10 ml/mol*min–1. Oil: Methanol = 1:9, NaOH = 1% wt%. Figure 12. Plot of lnk vs 1/T for the transesterification reac- tion under ultrasound conditions. where they used n-propanol as a solvent which is higher molecular weight alcohol compared to methanol used in this study. Other reported result was for the feedstock A. P. VYAS ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ACES 50 Table 5. Comparative study of ultrasound assiste d tr anse sterification [8]. Oil/Tri- olein Catalyst Catalyst wt% of oil Alcohol Oil to Alcohol Molar Ratio Ultrasonic Frequency Source of Ultrasound Reaction Conditions Ester Yield, % Ester Conver- sion, % Ref. Triolein KOH 1 Methanol 1:6 40 kHz Ultrasonic Cleaner (1200 W) 25℃, 10 min - > 90 [5] NA NaOH 0.5 n-Propanol 1:6 28 kHz 40 kHz Ultrasonic Cleaner (1200 W) 25℃, 20 min 25℃, 20 min 92 88 - - [7] Triolein NaOH 1 Ethanol 1:6 40 kHz Ultrasonic Cleaner (1200 W) 25℃, < 20 min - 98 [9] Soy b ean frying Oil NaOH 1.5 Methanol NA 24 kHz Ultrasonicator (200 W) 60℃, 20 min 97 - [10] Fish Oil C2H5ONa 0.8 Ethanol 1:6 20 kHz Ultrasonic Probe 60℃, 60 min 98.2 - [8] of soybean frying oil [10]. The present study compares favourably with the results reported in literature. Other comparable published results of different researchers are presented in Table 5. Since, the process seems economic; the economic st udy i s t o be carri ed o ut . 7. Acknowledgements The authors thank the authorities of the Nirma Univesity, Ahmedabad for supporting the investigation. 8. References [1] A. P. Vyas, N. Subrahmanyam and P. A. Patel, “Produc- tion of Biodiesel through Transesterification of Jatropha Oil Using KNO3/Al2O3 Solid Cataly st,” Fuel, Vol. 88, No. 4, 2009, pp. 625-628. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.10.033 [2] A. Kalva, T. Sivasankar and V. S. Moholkar, “Physical Mechanism of Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Bio- diesel,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2009, pp. 534-544. doi:10.1021/ie800269g [3] A. K. Singh, S. D. Fernando and R. Hernandez, “Base- Catalyzed Fast Transesterification of Soybean Oil Using Ultrasonication,” Energy & Fuels, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2007, pp. 1161-1164. doi:10.1021/ef060507g [4] A. P. Vyas, J. L. Verma and N. Subrahmanyam, “A Re- view on FAME Production Processes,” Fuel, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.014 [5] H. D. Hanh, N. T. Dong, K. Okitsu, R. Nishimura and M. Yasuaki, “Effects of Molar Ratio, Catalyst Concentration and Temperature on Transesterification of Triolein with Ethanol under Ultrasonic Irradiation,” Journal of the Ja- pan Petroleum Institute, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2007, pp. 195- 199. doi:10.1627/jpi.50.195 [6] D. Kumar, G. Kumar and C. P. P. Singh, “Ultrasonic- Assisted Transesterification of Jatropha curcus Oil Using Solid Catalyst, Na/SiO2,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, June 2010, pp. 839-844. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.03.001 [7] C. Stavarache, M. Vinatoru, R. Nishimura and Y. Maeda, “Fatty Acids Methyl Esters from Vegetable Oil by Means of Ultrasonic Energy,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2005, pp. 367-372. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.04.001 [8] R. E. Armenta, M. Vinatoru, A. M. Burja, J. A. Kralovec and C. J. Barrow, “Transesterification of Fish Oil to Pro- duce Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters Using Ultrasonic Energy,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, Vol. 84, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1045-1052. [9] H. D. Hanh, N. T. Dong, K. Okitsu, R. Nishimura and M. Yasuaki, “Biodiesel Production through Transesterifica- tion of Triolein with Various Alcohols in an Ultrasonic Field,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2009, pp. 766- 768. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.007 [10] K. G. Georgogianni, M. G. Kontominas, E. Tegou, D. Avlonitis and V. Gergis, “Biodiesel Production: Reaction and Process Parameters of Alkali-Catalyzed Transesteri- fication of Waste Frying Oils,” Energy & Fuels, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2007, pp. 3023-3027. doi:10.1021/ef070102b |