﻿ Periodic Bifurcations in Descendant Trees of Finite p-Groups

Vol.05 No.04(2015), Article ID:54896,33 pages
10.4236/apm.2015.54020

Periodic bifurcations in Descendant Trees of finite p-groups

Daniel C. Mayer

Naglergasse 53, 8010 Graz, Austria   Received 20 February 2015; accepted 13 March 2015; published 23 March 2015

ABSTRACT

Theoretical background and an implementation of the p-group generation algorithm by Newman and O’Brien are used to provide computational evidence of a new type of periodically repeating patterns in pruned descendant trees of finite p-groups.

Keywords:

finite p-Group, Central series, Descendant Tree, pro-p group, coclasstree, p-Covering Group, nuclear Rank, multifurcation, coclass Graph, Parametrized Presentation, commutator Calculus, Schur -group 1. Introduction

In §§2 - 11, we present an exposition of facts concerning the mathematical structure which forms the central idea of this article: descendant trees of finite p-groups. Their computational construction is recalled in §§12 - 20 on the p-group generation algorithm. Recently periodic patterns have been discovered in descendant trees with promising arithmetical applications form the topic of the final §21 and the coronation of the entire work.

2. Thestructure: Descendant trees

In mathematics, specifically group theory, a descendant tree is a hierarchical structure for visualizing parent- descendant relations (§§4 and 6) between isomorphism classes of finite groups of prime power order , for a fixed prime number and varying integer exponents . Such groups are briefly called finite p-groups. The vertices of a descendant tree are isomorphism classes of finite -groups.

Additionally to their order , finite p-groups possess two further related invariants, the nilpotency class and the coclass (§§5 and 8). It turned out that descendant trees of a particular kind, the so-called pruned coclass trees whose infinitely many vertices share a common coclass , reveal a repeating finite pattern (§7). These two crucial properties of finiteness and periodicity, which have been proved independently by du Sautoy  and by Eick and Leedham-Green  , admit a characterization of all members of the tree by finitely many parametrized presentations (§§10 and 21). Consequently, descendant trees play a fundamental role in the classification of finite p-groups. By means of kernels and targets of Artin transfer homomorphisms  , de- scendant trees can be endowed with additional structure  - , which recently turned out to be decisive for ari- thmetical applications in class field theory, in particular, for determining the exact length of p-class towers  .

An important question is how the descendant tree can actually be constructed for an assigned starting group which is taken as the root of the tree. Sections §§13 - 19 are devoted to recall a minimum of the necessary background concerning the p-group generation algorithm by Newman  and O’Brien   , which is a recursive process for constructing the descendant tree of a foregiven finite p-group playing the role of the tree root. This algorithm is now implemented in the ANUPQ-package  of the computational algebra systems GAP  and MAGMA  .

As a final highlight in §21, whose formulation requires an understanding of all the preceding sections, this article concludes with brand-new discoveries of an unknown, and up to now unproved, kind of repeating infinite patterns called periodic bifurcations, which appeared in extensive computational constructions of descendant trees of certain finite 2-groups, resp. 3-groups, G with abelianization of type (2,2,2), resp. (3,3), and have immediate applications in algebraic number theory and class field theory.

3. Historical remarks onbifurcation

Since computer aided classifications of finite -groups go back to 1975, fourty years ago, there arises the question why periodic bifurcations did not show up in the earlier literature already. At the first sight, this fact seems incomprehensible, because the smallest two 3-groups which reveal the phenomenon of periodic bifurcations with modest complexity were well known to both, Ascione, Havas and Leedham-Green  and Nebelung  . Their SmallGroups identifiers are and (see §9 and   ). Due to the lack of systematic identifiers in 1977, they were called the non-CF groups Q and U in ( , Table 1, p. 265, and Table 2, p. 266), since their lower central series has a non-cyclic factor of type (3,3). Similarly, there was no SmallGroups Database yet in 1989, whence the two groups were designated by and in ( , Satz 6.14, p. 208).

So Ascione and Nebelung were both standing in front of the door to a realm of uncharted waters. The reason why they did not enter this door was the sharp definition of their project targets. A bifurcation is the special case of a 2-fold multifurcation (§8): At a vertex of coclass with nuclear rank, the de- scendant tree forks into a regular component of the same coclass and an irregular component of the next coclass.

Ascione’s thesis subject   in 1979 was to investigate two-generated 3-groups of second maximal class, that is, of coclass. Consequently, she studied the regular tree for and did not touch the irregular component whose members are not of second maximal class.

The goal of Nebelung’s dissertation  in 1989 was the classification of metabelian 3-groups with of type. Therefore she focused on the metabelian skeleton of the regular coclass tree for (a special case of a pruned coclass tree, see §7) and omitted the irregular component whose members are entirely non-metabelian of derived length 3.

4. Definitions and terminology

According to Newman ( , 2, pp. 52-53), there exist several distinct definitions of the parent of a finite -group. The common principle is to form the quotient of by a suitable normal subgroup which can be either

[(P)]

1) the centre of, whence is called central quotient of or

2) the last non-trivial term of the lower central series of, where denotes the nilpotency class of or

3) the last non-trivial term of the lower exponent- central series of, where denotes the exponent-p class of or

4) the last non-trivial term of the derived series of, where denotes the derived length of.

In each case, is called an immediate descendant of and a directed edge of the tree is defined either by in the direction of the canonical projection onto the quotient or by in the opposite direction, which is more usual for descendant trees. The former convention is adopted by Leedham-Green and Newman ( , 2, pp. 194-195), by du Sautoy and Segal ( , 7, p. 280), by Leedham-Green and McKay ( , Dfn.8.4.1, p. 166), and by Eick, Leedham-Green, Newman and O’Brien ( , 1). The latter definition is used by Newman ( , 2, pp. 52-53), by Newman and O’Brien ( , 1, p. 131), by du Sautoy ( , 1, p. 67), by Dietrich, Eick and Feichtenschlager ( , 2, p. 46) and by Eick and Leedham-Green ( , 1, p. 275).

In the following, the direction of the canonical projections is selected for all edges. Then, more generally, a vertex is a descendant of a vertex, and is an ancestor of, if either is equal to or there is a path

(1)

of directed edges from to. The vertices forming the path necessarily coincide with the iterated parents of, with:

(2)

In the most important special case (P2) of parents defined as last non-trivial lower central quotients, they can also be viewed as the successive quotients of class of when the nilpotency class of is given by:

(3)

with.

Generally, the descendant tree of a vertex is the subtree of all descendants of, starting at the root. The maximal possible descendant tree of the trivial group 1 contains all finite -groups and is somewhat exceptional, since, for any parent definition (P1 - P4), the trivial group 1 has infinitely many abelian -groups as its immediate descendants. The parent definitions (P2 - P3) have the advantage that any non-trivial finite -group (of order divisible by) possesses only finitely many immediate descendants.

5. Pro-pgroups and coclass trees

For a sound understanding of coclass trees as a particular instance of descendant trees, it is necessary to sum- marize some facts concerning infinite topological pro- groups. The members, with, of the lower central series of a pro- group are open and closed subgroups of finite index, and therefore the corresponding quotients are finite -groups. The pro- group is said to be of coclass

when the limit of the coclass of the successive quotients exists and is

finite. An infinite pro- group of coclass is a -adic pre-space group ( , Dfn.7.4.11, p. 147), since it has a normal subgroup, the translation group, which is a free module over the ring of -adic integers of uniquely determined rank, the dimension, such that the quotient is a finite -group, the point group, which acts on uniserially. The dimension is given by

(4)

A central finiteness result for infinite pro- groups of coclass is provided by the so-called Theorem D, which is one of the five Coclass Theorems proved in 1994 independently by Shalev  and by Leedham-Green ( , Thm.7.7, p. 66), and conjectured in 1980 already by Leedham-Green and Newman ( , 2, pp. 194- 196). Theorem D asserts that there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of infinite pro- groups of coclass, for any fixed prime and any fixed non-negative integer. As a consequence, if is an infinite pro- group of coclass, then there exists a minimal integer such that the following three conditions are satisfied for any integer.

;

is not a lower central quotient of any infinite pro- group of coclass which is not isomorphic

to;

is cyclic of order.

The descendant tree, with respect to the parent definition (P2), of the root with

minimal is called the coclass tree of and its unique maximal infinite (reverse-directed) path

(5)

is called the mainline (or trunk) of the tree.

6. Tree Diagram

Further terminology, used in diagrams visualizing finite parts of descendant trees, is explained in Figure 1 by means of an artificial abstract tree. On the left hand side, a level indicates the basic top-down design of a descendant tree. For concrete trees, such as those in Figure 2, resp. Figure 3, etc., the level is usually replaced by a scale of orders increasing from the top to the bottom. A vertex is capable (or extendable) if it has at least one immediate descendant, otherwise it is terminal (or a leaf). Vertices sharing a common parent are called siblings.

Figure 1. Terminology for descendant trees.

Figure 2. 2-groups of coclass 1.

If the descendant tree is a coclass tree with root and with mainline vertices

labelled according to the level n, then the finite subtree defined as the difference set

(6)

is called the nth branch (or twig) of the tree or also the branch with root, for any. The depth of a branch is the maximal length of the paths connecting its vertices with its root.

Figure 1 shows a descendant tree whose branches both have depth 0, and, resp., are isomorphic as trees.

If all vertices of depth bigger than a given integer are removed from branch, then we obtain the

(depth-)pruned branch. Correspondingly, the pruned coclass tree, resp. the entire coclass tree

, consists of the infinite sequence of its pruned branches, resp. branches,

connected by the mainline, whose vertices are called infinitely capable.

Figure 3. 3-groups of coclass 1.

7. Virtual Periodicity

The periodicity of branches of depth-pruned coclass trees has been proved with analytic methods using zeta functions ( , 7, Thm.15, p. 280) of groups by du Sautoy ( , Thm.1.11, p. 68, and Thm.8.3, p. 103), and with algebraic techniques using cohomology groups by Eick and Leedham-Green  . The former methods admit the qualitative insight of ultimate virtual periodicity, the latter techniques determine the quantitative structure.

Theorem 7.1 For any infinite pro- group of coclass and dimension, and for any given depth, there exists an effective minimal lower bound, where periodicity of length of depth- pruned branches of the coclass tree sets in, that is, there exist graph isomorphisms

(7)

Proof. The graph isomorphisms of depth- pruned banches with roots of sufficiently large order are derived with cohomological methods in ( , Thm.6, p. 277, Thm.9, p. 278) and the effective lower bound for the branch root orders is established in ( , Thm.29, p. 287).

This central result can be expressed ostensively: When we look at a coclass tree through a pair of blinkers and ignore a finite number of pre-periodic branches at the top, then we shall see a repeating finite pattern (ultimate periodicity). However, if we take wider blinkers the pre-periodic initial section may become longer (virtual periodicity).

The vertex is called the periodic root of the pruned coclass tree, for a fixed value of the depth.

See Figure 1.

8. Multifurcation and coclass Graphs

Assume that parents of finite -groups are defined as last non-trivial lower central quotients (P2). For a -group G of coclass, we can distinguish its (entire) descendant tree and its coclass-r descendant tree, the subtree consisting of descendants of coclass r only. The group G is coclass-settled if

.

The nuclear rank of G (see §14) in the theory of the -group generation algorithm by Newman  and O’Brien  provides the following criteria.

is terminal, and thus trivially coclass-settled, if and only if;

・ If, then G is capable, but it remains unknown whether G is coclass-settled;

・ If, then G is capable and certainly not coclass-settled.

In the last case, a more precise assertion is possible: If G has coclass and nuclear rank, then it gives rise to an -fold multifurcation into a regular coclass- descendant tree and irregular descendant graphs of coclass, for. Consequently, the descendant tree of G is the disjoint union

(8)

Multifurcation is correlated with different orders of the last non-trivial lower central of immediate descendants. Since the nilpotency class increases exactly by a unit, , from a parent

to any immediate descendant, the coclass remains stable, , if.

In this case, is a regular immediate descendant with directed edge of depth 1, as usual. However,

the coclass increases by, if with. Then is called an irregular immediate

descendant with directed edge of depth.

If the condition of depth (or step size) 1 is imposed on all directed edges, then the maximal descendant tree of the trivial group 1 splits into a countably infinite disjoint union

(9)

of directed coclass graphs, which are rather forests than trees. More precisely, the above mentioned

Coclass Theorems imply that

(10)

is the disjoint union of finitely many coclass trees of pairwise non-isomorphic infinite pro- groups of coclass (Theorem D) and a finite subgraph of sporadic groups lying outside of any coclass tree.

9. Identifiers

The SmallGroups Library identifiers of finite groups, in particular p-groups, given in the form

in the following concrete examples of descendant trees, are due to Besche, Eick and O’Brien   . When the group orders are given in a scale on the left hand side as in Figure 2 and Figure 3, the identifiers are briefly denoted by

Depending on the prime p, there is an upper bound on the order of groups for which a SmallGroup identifier exists, e.g. for, and for. For groups of bigger orders, a notation with generalized identifiers resembling the descendant structure is employed: a regular immediate descendant, con- nected by an edge of depth 1 with its parent P, is denoted by

and an irregular immediate descendant, connected by an edge of depth with its parent P, is denoted by

The ANUPQ package  containing the implementation of the p-group generation algorithm uses this notation, which goes back to Ascione in 1979  .

10. Concrete Examples of Trees

In all examples, the underlying parent definition (P2) corresponds to the usual lower central series. Occasional differences to the parent definition (P3) with respect to the lower exponent-p central series are pointed out.

10.1. Coclass 0

The coclass graph

(11)

of finite p-groups of coclass 0 does not contain a coclass tree and consists of the trivial group 1 and the cyclic group of order p, which is a leaf (however, it is capable with respect to the lower exponent-p central series). For the SmallGroup identifier of is, for it is.

10.2. Coclass 1

The coclass graph

(12)

of finite p-groups of coclass 1 consists of the unique coclass tree with root, the elementary

abelian p-group of rank 2, and a single isolated vertex (a terminal orphan without proper parent in the same co- class graph, since the directed edge to the trivial group 1 has depth 2), the cyclic group of order in the sporadic part (however, this group is capable with respect to the lower exponent- central series). The tree is the coclass tree of the unique infinite pro-p group of coclass 1.

For, resp., the SmallGroup identifier of the root is, resp., and a tree diagram of the coclass graph from branch up to branch (counted with respect to the p-logarithm of the order of the branch root) is drawn in Figure 2, resp. Figure 3, where all groups of order at least are metabelian, that is non-abelian with derived length 2 (vertices represented by black discs in contrast to contour squares indicating abelian groups). In Figure 3, smaller black discs denote metabelian 3-groups where even the maximal subgroups are non-abelian, a feature which does not occur for the metabelian 2-groups in Figure 2, since they all possess an abelian subgroup of index p (usually exactly one). The coclass tree of, resp., has periodic root and period of length 1 starting with branch, resp. periodic root and period of length 2 starting with branch. Both trees have branches of bounded depth 1, so their virtual periodicity is in fact a strict periodicity. The, resp., denote isoclinism families   .

However, the coclass tree of with has unbounded depth and contains non-metabelian groups, and the coclass tree of with has even unbounded width, that is the number of descendants of a fixed order increases indefinitely with growing order  .

With the aid of kernels and targets of Artin transfer homomorphisms  , the diagrams in Figure 2 and Figure 3 can be endowed with additional information and redrawn as structured descendant trees ( , Figure 3.1, p. 419, and Figure 3.2, p. 422).

The concrete examples and provide an opportunity to give a parametrized polycyclic power-commutator presentation ( , pp. 82-84) for the complete coclass tree, mentioned in §2 as a benefit of the descendant tree concept and as a consequence of the periodicity of the pruned coclass tree. In both cases, the group is generated by two elements but the presentation contains the series of higher commutators, , starting with the main commutator. The nilpotency is formally expressed

by, when the group is of order.

For, there are two parameters and the pc-presentation is given by

(13)

The 2-groups of maximal class, that is of coclass 1, form three periodic infinite sequences:

・ the dihedral groups, , , forming the mainline (with infinitely capable vertices);

・ the generalized quaternion groups, , , which are all terminal vertices;

・ the semidihedral groups, , , which are also leaves.

For, there are three parameters and and the pc-presentation is given by

(14)

-groups with parameter possess an abelian maximal subgroup, those with parameter do not. More precisely, an existing abelian maximal subgroup is unique, except for the two extra special groups

and, where all four maximal subgroups are abelian.

In contrast to any bigger coclass, the coclass graph exclusively contains -groups with abelianization of type, except for its unique isolated vertex. The case is distinguished by the truth of the reverse statement: Any -group with abelianization of type (2,2) is of coclass 1 (Taussky’s Theorem ( , p. 83).

Figure 4 shows the interface between finite 3-groups of coclass 1 and 2 of type (3,3).

10.3. Coclass 2

The genesis of the coclass graph with is not uniform. -groups with several distinct abelia- nizations contribute to its constitution. For coclass, there are essential contributions from groups with abelianizations of the types, , , and an isolated contribution by the cyclic group of order:

(15)

10.3.1. Abelianization of type

As opposed to -groups of coclass with abelianization of type or, which arise as regular descendants of abelian -groups of the same types, -groups of coclass with abelianization of type arise from irregular descendants of a non-abelian -group with coclass and nuclear rank 2.

For the prime, such groups do not exist at all, since the dihedral group is coclass-settled, which is the deeper reason for Taussky’s Theorem. This remarkable fact has been observed by Bagnera ( , Part 2, 4, p. 182) in 1898 already.

For odd primes, the existence of -groups of coclass 2 with abelianization of type is due to the fact that the extra special group is not coclass-settled. Its nuclear rank equals 2, which gives rise to a bifurcation of the descendant tree into two coclass graphs. The regular component is a subtree of the unique tree in the coclass graph. The irregular

component becomes a subgraph of the coclass graph when the

connecting edges of depth 2 of the irregular immediate descendants of are removed.

For, this subgraph is drawn in Figure 4. It has seven top level vertices of three important kinds, all having order, which have been discovered by Bagnera ( , Part 2, 4, pp. 182-183).

Figure 4. 3-groups of coclass 2 with abelianization (3,3).

・ Firstly, there are two terminal Schur -groups  and in the sporadic part of the coclass graph;

・ Secondly, the two groups and are roots of finite trees in the sporadic part (however, since they are not coclass-settled, the complete trees are infinite);

・ And, finally, the three groups, and give rise to (infinite) coclass trees, e.g.,

, , , each having a metabelian mainline, in the coclass graph

. None of these three groups is coclass-settled. See §21.

Displaying additional information on kernels and targets of Artin transfers  , we can draw these trees as structured descendant trees ( , Figure 3.5, p. 439, Figure 3.6, p. 442, and Figure 3.7, p. 443).

Definition 10.1 Generally, a Schur group (called a closed group by I. Schur, who coined the concept) is a

pro-p group G whose relation rank coincides with its generator rank

. A -group is a pro-p group G which possesses an automorphism

inducing the inversion on its abelianization. A Schur -group   - is a Schur group G which is also a -group and has a finite abelianization.

It should be pointed out that is not root of a coclass tree, since its immediate descendant, which is root of a coclass tree with metabelian mainline vertices, has two siblings, resp., which give rise to a single, resp. three, coclass tree(s) with non-metabelian mainline vertices having cyclic centres of order 3 and branches of considerable complexity but nevertheless of bounded depth 5.

10.3.2. Pro-3 groups of Coclass 2 with Non-trivial centre

Eick, Leedham-Green, Newman and O’Brien ( , 4, Thm.4.1) have constructed a family of infinite pro-3 groups with coclass 2 having a non-trivial centre of order 3. The members are characterized by three parameters. Their finite quotients generate all mainline vertices with bicyclic centres of type of six coclass trees in the coclass graph. The association of parameters to the roots of these six trees is given in Table 1, the tree diagrams are indicated in Figure 4 and Figure 5, and the parametrized pro-3 presentation is given by

(16)

Figure 5 shows some finite 3-groups with coclass 2 and type.

10.3.3. Abelianization of type

For, the top levels of the subtree of the coclass graph are drawn in Figure 5. The most important vertices of this tree are the eight siblings sharing the common parent, which are of three important kinds.

・ Firstly, there are three leaves, , having cyclic centre of order 9, and a single leaf with bicyclic centre of type;

・ Secondly, the group is root of a finite tree;

・ And, finally, the three groups, and give rise to infinite coclass trees, e. g., , , , each having a metabelian mainline, the first with cyclic centres of order, the second and third with bicyclic centres of type.

Here, it should be emphasized that is not root of a coclass tree, since aside from its descendant, which is root of a coclass tree with metabelian mainline vertices, it possesses five further descen- dants which give rise to coclass trees with non-metabelian mainline vertices having cyclic centres of order 3 and branches of considerable complexity, here partially even with unbounded depth ( , Thm.4.2(a-b)).

10.3.4. Abelianization of type

For, resp., there exists a unique coclass tree with -groups of type in the coclass graph. Its root is the elementary abelian -group of type, that is, , resp..

Table 1. Quotients of the groups.

Figure 5. 3-groups of coclass 2 with abelianization (9,3).

This unique tree corresponds to the pro-2 group of the family #59 by Newman and O’Brien ( , Appendix A, no. 59, p. 153, Appendix B, Tbl. 59, p. 165), resp. the pro-3 group given by the parameters in Table 1. For, the tree is indicated in Figure 6.

Figure 6 shows some finite 2-groups of coclass 2,3,4 and type (2,2,2).

10.4. Coclass 3

Here again, -groups with several distinct abelianizations contribute to the constitution of the coclass graph. There are regular, resp. irregular, essential contributions from groups with abelianizations of the types, , , , resp., , , and an isolated contribution by the cyclic group of order.

10.4.1. Abelianization of type

Since the elementary abelian -group of rank 3, that is, , resp., for, resp.

Figure 6. 2-groups of coclass 3 with abelianization (2,2,2).

, is not coclass-settled, it gives rise to a multifurcation. The regular component has

been described in the section about coclass 2. The irregular component becomes a

subgraph of the coclass graph when the connecting edges of depth 2 of the

irregular immediate descendants of are removed.

For, this subgraph is contained in Figure 6. It has nine top level vertices of order which can be divided into terminal and capable vertices:

・ the groups and are leaves;

・ the five groups and the two groups are infinitely capable.

The trees arising from the capable vertices are associated with infinite pro-2 groups by Newman and O’Brien ( , Appendix A, no. 73-79, pp. 154-155, and Appendix B, Tbl. 73-79, pp. 167-168) in the following manner:

gives rise to

associated with family, and associated with family;

is associated with family;

is associated with family;

is associated with family;

gives rise to

associated with family (see §21), and finally

is associated with family (see Figure 6).

The roots of the coclass trees in Figure 6 and in Figure 7 are

siblings.

Figure 7. Periodic Bifurcations in.

10.4.2. Hall-Senior classification

Seven of these nine top level vertices have been investigated by Benjamin, Lemmermeyer and Snyder ( , 2, Tbl. 1) with respect to their occurrence as class-2 quotients of bigger metabelian 2-groups of type and with coclass 3, which are exactly the members of the descendant trees of the seven vertices. These authors use the classification of 2-groups by Hall and Senior  which is put in correspondence with the SmallGroups Library   in Table 2. The complexity of the descendant trees of these seven vertices increases with the 2-ranks and 4-ranks indicated in Table 2, where the maximal subgroups of index 2 in are denoted by, for.

11. History of Descendant Trees

Descendant trees with central quotients as parents (P1) are implicit in Hall’s 1940 paper  about isoclinism of groups. Trees with last non-trivial lower central quotients as parents (P2) were first presented by Leedham- Green at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Vancouver, 1974  . The first extensive tree diagrams have been drawn manually by Ascione, Havas and Leedham-Green (1977)  , by Ascione (1979)  and by Nebelung (1989)  . In the former two cases, the parent definition by means of the lower exponent-p central series (P3) was adopted in view of computational advantages, in the latter case, where theoretical aspects were focused, the parents were taken with respect to the usual lower central series (P2).

The kernels and targets of Artin transfer homomorphisms have recently turned out to be compatible with parent-descendant relations between finite p-groups and can favourably be used to endow descendant trees with additional structure  .

12. The Construction: p-group Generation algorithm

The p-group generation algorithm by Newman  and O’Brien   is a recursive process for constructing the descendant tree of an assigned finite p-group which is taken as the root of the tree. It is discussed in some detail in §§13-19.

13. Lower Exponent-p Central Series

For a finite p-group G, the lower exponent-p central series (briefly lower p-central series) of is a

descending series of characteristic subgroups of, defined recursively by

(17)

Since any non-trivial finite p-group is nilpotent, there exists an integer such that

and is called the exponent-p class (briefly p-class) of. Only the trivial

Table 2. Class-2 quotients of certain metabelian 2-groups of type (2,2,2).

group 1 has. Generally, for any finite p-group, its p-class can be defined as

.

The complete lower p-central series of is therefore given by

(18)

since is the Frattini subgroup of.

For the convenience of the reader and for pointing out the shifted numeration, we recall that the (usual) lower

central series of is also a descending series of characteristic subgroups of, defined

recursively by

(19)

As above, for any non-trivial finite -group, there exists an integer such that

and is called the nilpotency class of, whereas is called the index of

nilpotency of. Only the trivial group 1 has.

Thus, the complete lower central series of is given by

(20)

since is the commutator subgroup or derived subgroup of.

The following rules should be remembered for the exponent- class:

Let be a finite -group.

[(R)]

1), since the descend more quickly than the;

2), for some group, for any;

3) For any, the conditions and imply;

4) For any, , for all, in particular,

, for all.

We point out that every non-trivial finite -group defines a maximal path with respect to the parent definition (P3), consisting of edges,

(21)

and ending in the trivial group. The last but one quotient of the maximal path of is the

elementary abelian -group of rank, where

denotes the generator rank of.

14. p-covering group, p-multiplicator and nucleus

Let be a finite -group with generators. Our goal is to compile a complete list of pairwise non- isomorphic immediate descendants of. It turned out that all immediate descendants can be obtained as quotients of a certain extension of which is called the -covering group of and can be constructed in the following manner.

We can certainly find a presentation of in the form of an exact sequence

(22)

where denotes the free group with generators and is an epimorphism with kernel. Then is a normal subgroup of consisting of the defining relations for. For

elements and, the conjugate and thus also the commutator

are contained in. Consequently, is a characteristic subgroup of, and the -multiplicator of is an elementary abelian -group, since

(23)

Now we can define the -covering group of by

(24)

and the exact sequence

(25)

shows that is an extension of by the elementary abelian -multiplicator. We call

(26)

the -multiplicator rank of.

Let us assume now that the assigned finite -group is of -class. Then the

conditions and imply, according to the rule (R3), and we can define the

nucleus of by

(27)

as a subgroup of the -multiplicator. Consequently, the nuclear rank

(28)

of is bounded from above by the -multiplicator rank.

15. Allowable subgroups of the p-multiplicator

As before, let be a finite p-group with generators. Any -elementary abelian central extension

of G by a p-elementary abelian subgroup such that

is a quotient of the -covering group of.

The reason is that there exists an epimorphism such that, where

denotes the canonical projection. Consequently, we have and thus

. Further, , since is -elementary, and,

since is central. Together this shows that and thus induces the desired

epimorphism such that.

In particular, an immediate descendant of is a -elementary abelian central extension

(29)

of, since

where.

A subgroup of the -multiplicator of is called allowable if it is given by the kernel

of an epimorphism onto an immediate descendant of. An equivalent

characterization is that is a proper subgroup which supplements the nucleus

(30)

Therefore, the first part of our goal to compile a list of all immediate descendants of is done, when we

have constructed all allowable subgroups of which supplement the nucleus,

where. However, in general the list

(31)

where will be redundant, due to isomorphisms

among the immediate descendants.

16. Orbits under extended Automorphisms

Two allowable subgroups and are called equivalent if the quotients, that

are the corresponding immediate descendants of, are isomorphic.

Such an isomorphism between immediate descendants of with

has the property that

and thus induces an automorphism of which can be extended to an automorphism

of the -covering group of. The restriction of this extended automorphism

to the -multiplicator of is determined uniquely by. Since

according to the rule (R2), each extended automorphism induces a permutation of the allowable subgroups. We define

(32)

to be the permutation group generated by all permutations induced by automorphisms of. Then the map

, is an epimorphism and the equivalence classes of allowable subgroups

are precisely the orbits of allowable subgroups under the action of the permutation group.

Eventually, our goal to compile a list of all immediate descendants of will be done,

when we select a representative for each of the orbits of allowable subgroups of under the action of. This is precisely what the -group generation algorithm does in a single step of the recursive procedure for constructing the descendant tree of an assigned root.

17. Capable p-groups and step Sizes

We recall from §6 that a finite p-group G is called capable (or extendable) if it possesses at least one immediate descendant, otherwise it is called terminal (or a leaf). As mentioned in §8 already, the nuclear rank of G admits a decision about the capability of G:

・ G is terminal if and only if;

・ G is capable if and only if.

In the case of capability, has immediate descendants of different step sizes, in dependence on the index

(33)

of the corresponding allowable subgroup in the -multiplicator. When G is of order, then an immediate descendant of step size is of order

For the related phenomenon of multifurcation of a descendant tree at a vertex G with nuclear rank

see §8 on multifurcation and coclass graphs.

The -group generation algorithm provides the flexibility to restrict the construction of immediate descen- dants to those of a single fixed step size, which is very convenient in the case of huge descendant numbers (see the next section).

18. Numbers of immediate Descendants

We denote the number of all immediate descendants, resp. immediate descendants of step size, of G by

, resp.. Then we have. As concrete examples, we present some interesting finite

metabelian -groups with extensive sets of immediate descendants, using the SmallGroups identifiers and additionally pointing out the numbers of capable immediate descendants in the usual format

(34)

as given by actual implementations of the -group generation algorithm in the computational algebra systems GAP and MAGMA. These invariants completely determine the local structure of the descendant tree.

First, let. We begin with groups having abelianization of type. See Figure 6.

・ The group of coclass 3 has ranks, and descendant numbers,. See 21;

・ The group of coclass 3 has ranks, and descendant numbers,. See §21;

・ The group of coclass 3 has ranks, and

descendant numbers,;

Next, let. We consider groups having abelianization of type. See Figure 4;

・ The group of coclass 1 has ranks, and descendant numbers,;

・ The group of coclass 2 has ranks, and descendant numbers,;

・ One of its immediate descendants, the group, has ranks, and descendant numbers,.

In contrast, groups with abelianization of type are partially located beyond the limit of actual computability.

・ The group of coclass 2 has ranks, and descendant numbers,;

・ The group of coclass 3 has ranks, and descendant numbers

, unknown;

・ The group of coclass 4 has ranks, and descendant numbers

, unknown.

19. Schur multiplier

Via the isomorphism

group

(35)

can be viewed as the additive analogue of the multiplicative group

(36)

of all roots of unity.

Let p be a prime number and G be a finite p-group with presentation as in the previous section. Then the second cohomology group

(37)

of the G-module is called the Schur multiplier of G. It can also be interpreted as the quotient group

(38)

Shafarevich ( , 6, p. 146) has proved that the difference between the relation rank

of G and the generator rank of G is given by the

minimal number of generators of the Schur multiplier of G, that is

(39)

Boston and Nover ( , 3.2, Prop. 2) have shown that

(40)

for all quotients of p-class, , of a pro-p group G with finite abelianization.

Furthermore, Blackhurst (in the appendix On the nucleus of certain p-groups of a paper by Boston, Bush and Hajir  ) has proved that a non-cyclic finite p-group G with trivial Schur multiplier is a terminal vertex in the descendant tree of the trivial group 1, that is,

(41)

We conclude this section by giving two examples.

・ A finite p-group G has a balanced presentation if and only if

, that is, if and only if its Schur multiplier is trivial. Such a group

is called a Schur group   - and it must be a leaf in the descendant tree;

・ A finite p-group G satisfies if and only if, that is, if

and only if it has a non-trivial cyclic Schur multiplier. Such a group is called a Schur group.

20. Pruning strategies

For searching a particular group in a descendant tree by looking for patterns defined by the kernels and targets of Artin transfer homomorphisms  , it is frequently adequate to reduce the number of vertices in the branches of a dense tree with high complexity by sifting groups with desired special properties, for example

[(F)]

1) filtering the -groups (see Definition 10.1);

2) eliminating a set of certain transfer kernel types (TKTs, see ( , pp. 403-404));

3) cancelling all non-metabelian groups (thus restricting to the metabelian skeleton);

4) removing metabelian groups with cyclic centre (usually of higher complexity);

5) cutting off vertices whose distance from the mainline (depth) exceeds some lower bound;

6) combining several different sifting criteria.

The result of such a sieving procedure is called a pruned descendant tree with respect to the desired set of properties.

However, in any case, it should be avoided that the mainline of a coclass tree is eliminated, since the result would be a disconnected infinite set of finite graphs instead of a tree. We expand this idea further in the following detailed discussion of new phenomena.

21. Striking News: periodic bifurcations intrees

We begin this section about brand-new discoveries with the most recent example of periodic bifurcations in trees of 2-groups. It has been found on the 17th of January 2015, motivated by a search for metabelian 2-class tower groups  of complex quadratic fields  and complex bicyclic biquadratic Dirichlet fields  .

21.1. Finite 2-Groups G with

The 2-groups under investigation are three-generator groups with elementary abelian commutator factor group of type. As shown in Figure 6 of §10, all such groups are descendants of the abelian root. Among its immediate descendants of step size 2, there are three groups which reveal multifurcation. has nuclear rank, giving rise to 3-fold multifurcation. The two groups and possess the required nuclear rank for bifurcation. Due to the arithmetical origin of the problem, we focused on the latter, , and constructed an extensive finite part of its pruned descendant tree, using the -group generation algorithm  - as implemented in the computational algebra system Magma    . All groups turned out to be metabelian.

Remark 21.1 Since our primary intention is to provide a sound group theoretic background for several phe- nomena discovered in class field theory and algebraic number theory, we eliminated superfluous brushwood in the descendant trees to avoid unnecessary complexity.

The selected sifting process for reducing the entire descendant tree to the pruned descendant tree filters all vertices which satisfy one of the conditions in Equation (44) or (49), and essentially consists of pruning strategy (F2), more precisely, of

1) omitting all the 14 terminal step size-2 descendants, and 5, resp. 4, of the 6 capable step size-2 descendants, together with their complete descendant trees, in Theorem 21.1, resp. Corollary 21.1, and

2) eliminating all, resp. 4, of the 5 terminal step size-1 descendants in Theorem 21.1, resp. Corollary 21.1.

Denote by the generators of a finite 2-group with abelian type invariants. We fix an ordering of the seven maximal normal subgroups by putting

(42)

Just within this subsection, we select a special designation for a TKT [ , p. 403-404] whose first layer consists exactly of all these seven planes in the 3-dimensional -vector space, in any ordering.

Definition 21.1 The transfer kernel type (TKT) is called a permutation if all seven

members of the first layer are maximal subgroups of and there exists a permutation such that

.

For brevity, we give 2-logarithms of abelian type invariants in the following theorem and we denote iteration

by formal exponents, for instance, , , and

. Further, we eliminate an initial anomaly of generalized identifiers by putting

and, formally.

Theorem 21.1 Let be a positive integer bounded from above by 10.

1) In the descendant tree of, there exists a unique path of length,

of (reverse) directed edges with uniform step size 2 such that, for all

(along the path, is a section of the surjection), and all the vertices

(43)

of this path share the following common invariants:

・ the transfer kernel type with layer containing three 2-cycles (and nearly a permutation, except for the

first component which is total,),

(44)

・ the 2-multiplicator rank and the nuclear rank, giving rise to the bifurcation,

(45)

・ and the counters of immediate descendants,

(46)

determining the local structure of the descendant tree.

2) A few other invariants of the vertices depend on the superscript,

・ the 2-logarithm of the order, the nilpotency class and the coclass,

(47)

・ a single component of layer, three components of layer, and layer of the transfer target type

(48)

In view of forthcoming number theoretic applications, we add the following

Corollary 21.1 Let be a non-negative integer.

1) The regular component of the descendant tree is a coclass tree which

contains a unique periodic sequence whose vertices with are characte-

rized by a permutation TKT

(49)

with a single fixed point and the same three 2-cycles, , as in the mainline TKT of Equation (44).

2) The irregular component of the descendant tree is a forest which contains a

unique second coclass tree whose mainline vertices

with possess the same permutation TKT as in Equation (49), apart from the first coclass tree

, where, whose mainline vertices with

share the TKT in Equation (44).

Proof. (of Theorem 21.1, Corollary 21.1 and Theorem 21.2)

The -group generation algorithm  - as implemented in the Magma computational algebra system    was employed to construct the pruned descendant tree with root which we

defined as the disjoint union of all pruned coclass trees with the successive descendants

, , of step size 2 of as roots. Using the well-known virtual periodicity 

 of each coclass tree, which turned out to be strict and of the smallest possible length 1, the

vertical construction was terminated at nilpotency class 12, considerably deeper than the point where periodicity sets in. The horizontal construction was extended up to coclass 13, where the amount of CPU time started to become annoying.

Within the frame of our computations, the periodicity was not restriced to bifurcations only: It seems that the pruned (or maybe even the entire) descendant trees are all isomorphic to as graphs. This is visualized impressively by Figure 7.

The extent to which we constructed the pruned descendant tree suggests the following conjecture.

Conjecture 21.1 Theorem 21.1, Corollary 21.1 and Theorem 21.2 remain true for an arbitrarily large positive integer, not necessarily bounded by 10.

Remark 21.2 We must emphasize that the root in Figure 7 is drawn for the sake of completeness

only, and that the mainline of the coclass tree is exceptional, since

・ its root is not a descendant of and

・ the TKT of its vertices with,

(50)

is a permutation with 5 fixed points and only a single 2-cycle.

One-parameter polycyclic pc-presentations for all occurring groups are given as follows.

1) For the mainline vertices of the coclass tree with class, that is, starting with and excluding the root, by

(51)

2) For the mainline vertices of the coclass tree with class by

(52)

3) For the mainline vertices of the coclass tree with class by

(53)

Theorem 21.2 For higher coclass the presentations (52) and (53) can be generalized in the shape of a two-parameter polycyclic pc-presentation for class.

(54)

To obtain a presentation for the vertices, , at depth 1 in the distinguished

periodic sequence whose vertices are characterized by the permutation TKT (49), we must only add the single

relation to the presentation (54) of the mainline vertices of the coclass tree given in

Theorem 21.2.

21.2. Finite 3-groups G with

We continue this section with periodic bifurcations in trees of 3-groups, which have been discovered in 2012 and 2013  - , inspired by a search for 3-class tower groups of complex quadratic fields    , which must be Schur -groups.

These 3-groups are two-generator groups of coclass at least 2 with elementary abelian commutator quotient of type. As shown in Figure 4 of §10, all such groups are descendants of the extra special group. Among its 7 immediate descendants of step size 2, there are only two groups which satisfy the requirements arising from the arithmetical background.

The two groups and do not show multifurcation themselves but they are not coclass- settled either, since their immediate mainline descendants and possess the required nuclear rank for bifurcation. We constructed an extensive finite part of their pruned descendant trees, , using the p-group generation algorithm  - as implemented in the computational algebra system Magma    .

Denote by the generators of a finite 3-group with abelian type invariants. We fix an ordering of the four maximal normal subgroups by putting

(55)

Within this subsection, we make use of special designations for transfer kernel types (TKTs) which were defined generally in [ , p. 403-404] and more specifically for the present scenario in   .

We are interested in the unavoidable mainline vertices with TKTs c.18, , resp. c.21, , and, above all, in most essential vertices of depth 1 forming periodic sequences with TKTs

, and, , resp., and,

, and we want to eliminate the numerous and annoying vertices with TKTs,

, resp.,.

We point out that, for instance, , is a shortcut for the layer

of the complete (layered) TKT.

Remark 21.3 We choose the following sifting strategy for reducing the entire descendant tree to the pruned descendant tree. We filter all vertices which, firstly, are -groups, and secondly satisfy one of the conditions in Equations (58) or (67), whence the process is a combination (F6) = (F1) + (F2) + (F5) and consists of

1) keeping all of the 3 terminal step size-2 descendants, which are exactly the Schur -groups, and omitting 2 of the 3 capable step size-2 descendants having TKT H.4, resp., together with their complete descendant trees, and

2) eliminating 2 of the 5 terminal step size-1 descendants having TKT, resp., and 2 of the 3 capable step size-1 descendants having TKT, resp., in Theorem 21.3.

For brevity, we give 3-logarithms of abelian type invariants in the following theorem and we denote iteration

by formal exponents, for instance, , , , and

. Further, we eliminate some initial anomalies of generalized identifiers by putting

, ,

, ,

,

, formally.

Theorem 21.3 Let be a positive integer bounded from above by 8.

1) In the descendant tree of, resp., there exists a unique path of length

,

of (reverse) directed edges of alternating step sizes 1 and 2 such that, for all

, and all the vertices with even superscript, ,

(56)

resp. all the vertices with odd superscript ,

(57)

of this path share the following common invariants, respectively:

・ the uniform (w.r.t. i) transfer kernel type, containing a total component,

(58)

・ the 2-multiplicator rank and the nuclear rank,

(59)

resp., giving rise to the bifurcation for odd,

(60)

・ and the counters of immediate descendants,

(61)

resp.

(62)

determining the local structure of the descendant tree.

2) A few other invariants of the vertices depend on the superscript i,

・ the 3-logarithm of the order, the nilpotency class and the coclass,

(63)

resp.

(64)

・ a single component of layer and the layer of the transfer target type

(65)

resp.

(66)

Theorem 21.3 provided the scaffold of the pruned descendant tree of, for,

with mainlines and periodic bifurcations.

With respect to number theoretic applications, however, the following Corollaries 21.2 and 21.3 are of the greatest importance.

Corollary 21.2 Let be a non-negative integer.

Whereas the vertices with even superscript, , that is, , are merely

links in the distinguished path, the vertices with odd superscript, , that is,

, reveal the essential periodic bifurcations with the following properties.

1) The regular component of the descendant tree is a coclass tree which

contains the mainline,

which entirely consists of -groups, and three distinguished periodic sequences whose vertices

are -groups exactly for even and are characterized by the following TKTs

with layer given by

(67)

which deviate from the mainline TKT of Equation (58) in a single component only.

2) The irregular component of the descendant tree is a forest which

contains a bunch of 3 isolated Schur -groups

which possess the same TKTs as in Equation (67), and additionally contains the root of the next coclass tree

, where, whose mainline vertices

with share the TKT in Equation (58).

The metabelian 3-groups forming the three distinguished periodic sequences

of the pruned coclass tree in Corollary 21.2, for, belong to the few groups for which all immediate descendants with respect to the parent definition (P4) are known (we did not use this kind of

descendants up to now.) Since all groups in are of derived length 3, the set of these descen-

dants can be defined in the following way.

Definition 21.2 Let be a finite metabelian -group. Then the set of all finite non-metabelian -groups whose second derived quotient is isomorphic to is called the cover of. The subset consisting of all Schur -groups in is called the balanced cover of.

Corollary 21.3 For, the group, which does not have a balanced presentation, possesses a

finite cover of cardinality and a unique Schur -group in its balanced cover with

. More precisely, the covers are given explicitly by

(68)

The arrows in Figure 8 and Figure 9 indicate the projections from all members of a cover onto the common metabelianization, that is, in the sense of the parent definition (P4), from the descendants onto the parent.

Proof. (of Theorem 21.3, Corollary 21.2, Corollary 21.3 and Theorem 21.4)

The -group generation algorithm  - , which is implemented in the computational algebra system Magma    , was used for constructing the pruned descendant trees with roots

which were defined as the disjoint union of all pruned coclass trees of the

descendants, , of as roots, together with siblings in the

irregular component, 3 of them Schur -groups with and. Using the strict

periodicity   of each pruned coclass tree, which turned out to be of length 2, the vertical

construction was terminated at nilpotency class 19, considerably deeper than the point where periodicity sets in. The horizontal construction was extended up to coclass 10, where the consumption of CPU time became daunting.

Within the frame of our computations, the periodicity was not restriced to bifurcations only: It seems that the

pruned (or maybe even the entire) descendant trees are all isomorphic to as

graphs. This is visualized impressively by Figure 8 and Figure 9, where the following notation (not to be confused with layers) is used

resp.

Figure 8. Periodic bifurcations in.

Similarly as in the previous section, the extent to which we constructed the pruned descendant trees suggests the following conjecture.

Conjecture 21.2 Theorem 21.3, Corollary 21.2 and Corollary 21.3 remain true for an arbitrarily large positive integer, not necessarily bounded by 8.

Figure 9. Periodic bifurcations in.

One-parameter polycyclic pc-presentations for the groups in the first three pruned coclass trees of are given as follows.

1) For the metabelian vertices of the pruned coclass tree with class, that is, starting with

and excluding the root and its descendant, by

(69)

2) For the non-metabelian vertices of the pruned coclass tree with class, and including

the Schur -groups, which are siblings of the root, by

(70)

3) For the non-metabelian vertices of the pruned coclass tree with class, and including

the Schur -groups, which are siblings of the root, by

(71)

The parameter is the nilpotency class of the group, and the parameters and determine

・ the location of the group on the descendant tree, and

・ the transfer kernel type (TKT) of the group, as follows:

lies on the mainline (this is the so-called mainline principle) and has TKT c.18, ,

whereas all the other groups belong to periodic sequences or are isolated Schur -groups:

possesses TKT E.6, ,

and have TKT H.4, , and lie outside of the pruned tree,

and have TKT E.14,.

In Figure 10, resp. Figure 11, we have drawn the lattice of normal subgroups of, resp..

The upper and lower central series, , , of these groups form subgraphs whose relative position justifies the names of these series, as visualized impressively by Figure 10 and Figure 11.

Generators, , and, are carefully selected independently from

individual isomorphism types and placed in locations which illustrate the structure of the groups. Furthermore, the normal lattice of the metabelianization is also included as a subgraph simply by putting.

We conclude with a theorem concerning the central series and some fundamental properties of the Schur - groups which we encountered among all the groups under investigation.

Theorem 21.4

Let be an integer. There exist exactly 6 pairwise non-isomorphic groups of order, class, coclass, having fixed derived length 3, such that

1) the factors of their upper central series are given by

Figure 10. Normal Lattice and Central Series of.

2) their second derived group is central and cyclic of order.

Furthermore,

・ they are Schur -groups with automorphism group of order,

・ the factors of their lower central series are given by

Figure 11. Normal Lattice and Central Series of.

・ their metabelianization is of order, class and of fixed coclass 2,

・ their biggest metabelian ancestor, that is the th iterated parent, is given by either or.

22. Conclusion

We emphasize that the results of Section 21.2 provide the background for considerably stronger assertions than those made in  (which are, however, sufficient already to disprove erroneous claims in   ). Firstly, they concern four TKTs E.6, E.14, E.8 and E.9 instead of just TKT E.9, and secondly, they apply to varying odd nilpotency class instead of just class 5.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge that our research is supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P 26008-N25. We are indebted to the anonymous referees for valuable suggestions improving the exposition and readability.

Cite this paper

Daniel C.Mayer， (2015) Periodic Bifurcations in Descendant Trees of Finite <i>p</i>-Groups。 Advances in Pure Mathematics05，162-195. doi: 10.4236/apm.2015.54020

References

1. 1. du Sautoy, M. (2001) Counting p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups. Publications Mathématiques de l’Institut des Hautes études Scientifiques, 92, 63-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02698914

2. 2. Eick, B. and Leedham-Green, C. (2008) On the Classification of Prime-Power Groups by Coclass. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 40, 274-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/blms/bdn007

3. 3. Artin, E. (1929) Idealklassen in Oberkorpern und allgemeines Reziprozitatsgesetz. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universitat Hamburg, 7, 46-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02941159

4. 4. Mayer, D.C. (2012) Transfers of Metabelian p-Groups. Monatshefte für Mathematik, 166, 467-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00605-010-0277-x

5. 5. Mayer, D.C. (2014) Principalization Algorithm via Class Group Structure. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, 26, 415-464.

6. 6. Mayer, D.C. (2013) The Distribution of Second p-Class Groups on Coclass Graphs. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, 25, 401-456.

7. 7. Bush, M.R. and Mayer, D.C. (2015) 3-Class Field Towers of Exact Length 3. Journal of Number Theory, 147, 766-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2014.08.010

8. 8. Newman, M.F. (1977) Determination of Groups of Prime-Power Order. In: Bryce, R.A., Cossey, J., Newman, M.F., Eds., Group Theory, Springer, Berlin, 73-84.

9. 9. O’Brien, E.A. (1990) The p-Group Generation Algorithm. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 9, 677-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-7171(08)80082-X

10. 10. Holt, D.F., Eick, B. and O’Brien, E.A. (2005) Handbook of Computational Group Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420035216

11. 11. Gamble, G., Nickel, W. and O’Brien, E.A. (2006) ANU p-Quotient—p-Quotient and p-Group Generation Algorithms. An Accepted GAP 4 Package, Available also in MAGMA.

12. 12. The GAP Group (2014) GAP—Groups, Algorithms, and Programming—A System for Computational Discrete Algebra. Version 4.7.5, Aachen, Braunschweig, Fort Collins, St. Andrews. http://www.gap-system.org

13. 13. The MAGMA Group (2014) MAGMA Computational Algebra System. Version 2.21-1, Sydney. http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au

14. 14. Ascione, J.A., Havas, G. and Leedham-Green, C.R. (1977) A Computer Aided Classification of Certain Groups of Prime Power Order. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 17, 257-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0004972700010467

15. 15. Nebelung, B. (1989) Klassifikation metabelscher 3-Gruppen mit Faktorkommutatorgruppe vom Typ (3,3) und Anwendung auf das Kapitulationsproblem. Inaugural Dissertation, Universitat zu Koln, Koln.

16. 16. Besche, H.U., Eick, B. and O’Brien, E.A. (2002) A Millennium Project: Constructing Small Groups. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 12, 623-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218196702001115

17. 17. Besche, H.U., Eick, B. and O’Brien, E.A. (2005) The Small Groups Library—A Library of Groups of Small Order. An Accepted and Refereed GAP 4 Package, Available also in MAGMA.

18. 18. Ascione, J.A. (1979) On 3-Groups of Second Maximal Class. Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

19. 19. Ascione, J.A. (1980) On 3-Groups of Second Maximal Class. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 21, 473-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700006298

20. 20. Newman, M.F. (1990) Groups of Prime-Power Order. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1456, 49-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0100730

21. 21. Leedham-Green, C.R. and Newman, M.F. (1980) Space Groups and Groups of Prime Power Order I. Archiv der Mathematik, 35, 193-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01235338

22. 22. du Sautoy, M. and Segal, D. (2000) Zeta Functions of Groups. In: du Sautoy, M., Segal, D. and Shalev, A., Eds., New Horizons in Pro-p Groups, Progress in Mathematics, Birkhauser, Basel, 249-286.

23. 23. Leedham-Green, C.R. and McKay, S. (2002) The Structure of Groups of Prime Power Order, London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series 27, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

24. 24. Eick, B., Leedham-Green, C.R., Newman, M.F. and O’Brien, E.A. (2013) On the Classification of Groups of Prime-Power Order by Coclass: The 3-Groups of Coclass 2. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 23, 1243-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218196713500252

25. 25. Newman, M.F. and O’Brien, E.A. (1999) Classifying 2-Groups by Coclass. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 351, 131-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-99-02124-8

26. 26. Dietrich, H., Eick, B. and Feichtenschlager, D. (2008) Investigating p-Groups by Coclass with GAP. In: Kappe, L.-C., Magidin, A. and Morse, R.F., Eds., Computational Group Theory and the Theory of Groups, AMS, Providence, 45-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/470/09185

27. 27. Shalev, A. (1994) The Structure of Finite p-Groups: Effective Proof of the Coclass Conjectures. Inventiones Mathematicae, 115, 315-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01231763

28. 28. Leedham-Green, C.R. (1994) The Structure of Finite p-Groups. Journal London Mathematical Society, 50, 49-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/jlms/50.1.49

29. 29. Hall, M. and Senior, J.K. (1964) The Groups of Order 2n (n ≤ 6). Macmillan, New York.

30. 30. Hall, P. (1940) The Classification of Prime-Power Groups. Journal für Die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 182, 130-141.

31. 31. Blackburn, N. (1958) On a Special Class of p-Groups. Acta Mathematica, 100, 45-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02559602

32. 32. Taussky, O. (1937) A Remark on the Class Field Tower. Journal London Mathematical Society, 12, 82-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-12.1.82

33. 33. Bagnera, G. (1898) La composizione dei gruppi finiti il cui grado è la quinta potenza di un numero primo. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 1, 137-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02419191

34. 34. Arrigoni, M. (1998) On Schur σ-Groups. Mathematische Nachrichten, 192, 71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mana.19981920105

35. 35. Boston, N., Bush, M.R. and Hajir, F. (2015) Heuristics for p-Class Towers of Imaginary Quadratic Fields. Mathematische Annalen, in Press.

36. 36. Koch, H. and Venkov, B.B. (1975) über den p-Klassenkorperturm eines imaginar-quadratischen Zahlkorpers. Astérisque, 24-25, 57-67.

37. 37. Benjamin, E., Lemmermeyer, F. and Snyder, C. (2003) Imaginary Quadratic Fields with Cl2(k)(2,2,2). Journal of Number Theory, 103, 38-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-314X(03)00084-2

38. 38. Shafarevich, I.R. (1964) Extensions with Prescribed Ramification Points (Russian). Publications Mathématiques de l’IHéS, 18, 71-95.

39. 39. Boston, N. and Nover, H. (2006) Computing Pro-p Galois Groups. Algorithmic Number Theory: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4076, 1-10.

40. 40. Mayer, D.C. (2012) The Second p-Class Group of a Number Field. International Journal of Number Theory, 8, 471-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S179304211250025X

41. 41. Nover, H. (2009) Computation of Galois Groups of 2-Class Towers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

42. 42. Azizi, A., Zekhnini, A. and Taous, M. (2015) Coclass of for Some Fields with 2-Class Groups of Type (2,2,2). Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, in Press.

43. 43. Bosma, W., Cannon, J. and Playoust, C. (1997) The Magma Algebra System. I. The User Language. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 24, 235-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsco.1996.0125

44. 44. Bosma, W., Cannon, J.J., Fieker, C. and Steels, A., Eds. (2014) Handbook of Magma Functions. Edition 2.21, University of Sydney, Sydney.

45. 45. Mayer, D.C. and Newman, M.F. (2013) Finite 3-Groups as Viewed from Class Field Theory, Groups St. Andrews 2013. University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland.

46. 46. Mayer, D.C., Bush, M.R. and Newman, M.F. (2013) 3-Class Field Towers of Exact Length 3. 18th OMG Congress and 123rd Annual DMV Meeting 2013, University of Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.

47. 47. Mayer, D.C., Bush, M.R. and Newman, M.F. (2013) Class Towers and Capitulation over Quadratic Fields. West Coast Number Theory 2013, Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove.

48. 48. Scholz, A. and Taussky, O. (1934) Die Hauptideale der kubischen Klassenkorper imaginar quadratischer Zahlkorper: Ihre rechnerische Bestimmung und ihr Einflu auf den Klassenkorperturm. Journal Für Die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 171, 19-41.

49. 49. Heider, F.-P. and Schmithals, B. (1982) Zur Kapitulation der Idealklassen in unverzweigten primzyklischen Erweiterungen. Journal Für Die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 336, 1-25.

50. 50. Mayer, D.C. (1991) Principalization in Complex S3-Fields. Congressus Numerantium, 80, 73-87.