[1]
|
Adams, M. (2002). Teaching English. Journal of English Linguistics, 30, 353-365. doi:10.1177/007542402237883
|
[2]
|
Anderson, K., & Lynch, T. (1998). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[3]
|
Anderson, K., & Lynch, T. (2003). Learner/non-teacher interact the contribution of a course assistant to EAP speaking classes. Interaction and Language Learning. TESOL Case Studies in Practice Series. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
|
[4]
|
Auer, P., & Luzio, A. D. (2009). The contextualization of language. A Methodological Paradigm Discussion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[5]
|
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[6]
|
Boynton, A., & Blevins, W. (2004). Teaching students to read nonfiction. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
|
[7]
|
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[8]
|
Buck, G. (2003). Establishing annual measurable objectives for LEP students’ English language proficiency. Paper presented at the National Title Directors’ Conference, Annaheim.
|
[9]
|
Chen, Z. (2009). Language models for contextual error detection and correction, all 13 versions. CLAGI 09 Proceedings of the EACL. Stroudsburg.
|
[10]
|
Clark, B. (2008). The effects of intonation in discourse: The semantics and pragmatics of focus. Past Colloquia Organized by Janet Pierrehum, Northwestern University.
|
[11]
|
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2001). Interactional linguistics. Studies in Discourse and Grammar, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
|
[12]
|
Duke, N., & Bennett-Armistead, V. (2003). Reading and writing informational text in the primary grades: Research-based practices. New York: Scholastic.
|
[13]
|
Eslami, M., & Bijankhan, M. (2003). Persian intonation system. Iranian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 36-61.
|
[14]
|
Fujio, M. (2007). Communication strategies for the negotiation, establishment, and confirmation of common ground: A longitudinal study of Japanese-British conversational interaction. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo.
|
[15]
|
Gebhard, M. (2005). Hybrid discourses, and second language literacy and culture faculty. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 187. doi:10.2307/3588308
|
[16]
|
Genc, B., & Bada, E. (2005). Culture in language learning and teaching. The Reading Matrix, 5, 73-84.
|
[17]
|
Glazer, S., & Burke, M. (1994). An integrated approach to early literacy. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 95-106.
|
[18]
|
Grasser, A., Gernsbacher, R., & Goldman, R. (2003). Theories of social cognition. Learning Technology Center, University of Wisconsin- Madison.
|
[19]
|
Hansen, J. (2000). Inferential comprehension strategy for use with primary grade children. The Reading Teacher, 34, 665-669.
|
[20]
|
Hoek, K., & Kibrik, A. (2000). Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
|
[21]
|
Huckin, T., & Bloch, J. (2002). Strategies for inferring word meanings in context: A cognitive model. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes and J. Coady (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning (pp. 153-178). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
|
[22]
|
Hui, C. (2005). Pragmatic inference based on model [J]. The complementary of cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Washington: University of Washington.
|
[23]
|
Jeo, H. (2007). A phonetic study on phrasing. The 2nd European Conference on Korean Linguistics, 88-101
|
[24]
|
June, F. (2005). Discourse and computational linguistics. Michigan: Michigan University Press.
|
[25]
|
Keene, E., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader’s workshop. Portsmouth, NH: University Massachusetts Press.
|
[26]
|
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
|
[27]
|
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2009). Social linguistics and litercies Ideology in discourses, Formal and informal measures of reading. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
|
[28]
|
Lexile (2008). Lexile framework for reading. URL (last checked 5 March 2006) http://www.lexile.com
|
[29]
|
Mahjani, B. (2003). An instrumental study of prosodic features and intonation in modern farsi (persian) supervisor: Robert Ladd Master of Science. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
|
[30]
|
McCormick, S., & Hill, D. S. (2001). An analysis of the effects of tow procedures for increasing disabled readers inferencing skills. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 219-226.
|
[31]
|
Mewald, C., Gassner, O., & Siggott, G. (2009). Testing listening specifications for the E8-standards listening tests. LTC Technical Report. http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/ltc/downloads/LTC_Technical_Report
|
[32]
|
Mils, K. (2005). Deconstructing binary oppositions in literacy discourse and pedagogy. Journal of Language and Literacy, 28, 67-82.
|
[33]
|
Mish, F. (2005). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary. (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
|
[34]
|
Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Hopper, R.(2006). Talking, listening and learning: Effective talk in the primary classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
|
[35]
|
Oka, H., & Fujio, M. (2005). How do strategies work? Invest gating practical English ability. Bulletin of the Foreign Language Teaching Association, 9, 1-21.
|
[36]
|
O’Malley, J. (1996). Authentic assessment for language learners. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
|
[37]
|
Richards, J. C., & Anderson, N. A. (2005). How do you know? A strategy to help emergent readers make inferences. The Reading Teacher, 57, 290-293.
|
[38]
|
Scharer, P., Pinnell, S., Lyons, C., & Fountas, I. (2005). Becoming an engaged reader. Educational Leadership, 63, 24-29.
http://www.ascd.org/portal/site/ascd/menuitem.a4db
|
[39]
|
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
|
[40]
|
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511481499
|
[41]
|
Van, O. H., & Goldman, R. (1999). Text and context in functional linguistics. The construction of mental representations. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
|
[42]
|
Wagner, D. T. (2006). How knowledge helps.
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/sprin
|
[43]
|
Watson, K., & Smeltzer, R. (2000). Different categories about listening comprehension facts: Comparison between students and practitioners. Communication Research Reports, 1, 82-87.
|
[44]
|
Xie, X. (2005). The influence of schema theory on foreign language reading comprehension. The English Teacher, 34, 65-75.
|