Comparison of Iterative Wavefront Estimation Methods ()
Abstract
The iterative reconstruction methods of the wavefront
phase estimation from a set of discrete phase slope measurements have been
considered. The values of the root-mean-square difference between the
reconstructed and original wavefront have been received for Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel,
Successive over-relaxation and Successive over-relaxation with Simpson
Reconstructor methods. The method with the highest accuracy has been defined.
Share and Cite:
Y. Pankratova, A. Larichev and N. Iroshnikov, "Comparison of Iterative Wavefront Estimation Methods,"
Optics and Photonics Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2B, 2013, pp. 86-89. doi:
10.4236/opj.2013.32B022.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
|
O. Shanin, “Adaptive Optical Systems for Ultra-High Intensity Lasers,” Technosfera, Moscow, 2012.
|
[2]
|
J. Porter and others, “Adaptive Optics for Vision Science,” Wiley-Interscience.
|
[3]
|
D. Malacara, “Optical Shop Testing,” 3rd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, 1980.
|
[4]
|
W. H. Southwell, “Wavefront Estimation from Wavefront Slope Measurements,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 70, No. 8, 2007.
|
[5]
|
S. W. Bahk, “Highly Accurate Wavefront Reconstruction Algorithms over Broad Spatial-Frequency Bandwidth,” Optics Express, 2011.doi:10.1364/OE.19.018997
|
[6]
|
A. S. Goncharov and A. V. Larichev, “Speckle Structure of A Light Field Scattered by Human Eye Retina,” Laser Physics, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2007.
doi:10.1134/S1054660X07090095
|
[7]
|
Y. Carmon and E. N. Ribak, “Phase Retrieval by Demodulation of A Hartmann-Shack Sensor”
|