Both field and green house experiments were intended to investigate and evaluate the outcome of rhizobial inoculation supplemented with P and K on climbing beans production in northern Tanzania. The results obtained indicated that, inoculation using Rhizobium inoculants supplemented with fertilizers significantly (p ≤ 0.001) improved both vegetative and yield parameters of climbing beans varieties compared with control treatment. The economic analysis in rhizobium alone revealed a profit of US$ 2350 compared with control treatment with US$ 1558 profit, which was finally reflected in higher percentage increase over control and higher marginal rate of return (MRR). Thus, the use of <i>Rhizobium </i> inoculants supplemented with P and K increased climbing beans yield and the economic analysis performed based on total revenue and variable costs reflected an improvement in economic well being of a small hold farmer of northern Tanzania.
Common bean is a major grain legume in Tanzania, but smallholder farmers’ yields are far below potential, the main reasons being the low soil fertility due to lack of essential nutrients such as N, P and K [
Limiting factors such as diversity or scarcity of native Rhizobium population in soil can affect the legume performance and grain yield [
Bambara and Ndakidemi [
Nitrogen is a very important macro-nutrient largely involved in metabolic actions and protein synthesis, resulting to increased vegetative and reproductive growth and ultimately leads to yield of the crops [
Nyoki and Ndakidemi [
Phosphorus deficiency is also a chief contributing factor limiting BNF in legumes [
Potassium regulates the opening and closing of the plant stomata, thus helping to prevent water loss through transpiration and hence affecting growth and yield [
The very low nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium status of many soils in East African highlands suggests that availability of these elements will be an emerging limitation to crop productivity in the near future. Therefore, Rhizobium inoculation supplemented with recommended amount of phosphorus and potassium may play a crucial role in enhancing legume productivity in poorly depleted soils of East Africa; therefore, help to reduce the problem of hunger, poverty and poor health of most rural population of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) who cannot afford high price of inorganic nitrogenous fertilizers.
Studies by [
This paper titled Yield and Fiscal Benefits of Rhizobium inoculation supplemented with Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) in Climbing Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Northern Tanzania is a results of the experimental study performed in Tanzania. The study aimed to investigate and evaluate the outcome of inoculating Climbing beans varieties with rhizobial inoculant supplemented with some fertilizer P and K and its economic implication to small holder farmers.
Material and Methods, this part covers:
- Description of the study Area―Location;
- Experimental design―The setup of the experiments and parameters involved in the experiments.
Statistical Analysis Method used, here the following is displayed:
- Results for Root and Shoot Biomass (Field and Green house);
- Analyzed Yield Results for Field and Green house Experiment;
- Marginal Net Return (MNR), Total Variable Cost (TVC) and Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) of Climbing Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under field conditions.
Results and Discussion, this part is enriched with:
- Effects of Rhizobium inoculation on Shoot Biomass and Root Biomass of three climbing beans varieties tested (Phaseolus vulgaris L.);
- Effects of Fertilizer (P and K) on Shoot Biomass and Root Biomass of three climbing beans varieties tested (Phaseolus vulgaris L.);
- Effects of Rhizobium inoculation on nodules number, Grain yield and Yield parameters of three climbing beans varieties tested (Phaseolus vulgaris);
- Effect of fertilizer (P and K) supplementation on nodulation, yield and yield components of three climbing beans varieties (Cheupe, Selian 2005 and Selian 2006);
- The profitable aspects of Rhizobium inoculation supplemented by Phosphorus and Potassium in production of climbing legumes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.);
- Interactive effect between Rhizobium inoculation and varieties on the shoot biomass and number of nodules on climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).
Conclusion:
- This study has revealed a positive outcome of the rhizobial inoculation when used together with fertilizer K and P supplementation. The economic analysis on this study has shown a benefit to the small farmers of northern Tanzania thus, the technology is highly recommended to put in use.
The field experiment was laid down at―Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TACRI) located at 1390 m above sea level, latitude (3˚14'44") S and longitude (37˚14'48") E. The maximum temperature ranges from 22.7˚C - 23.5˚C and the minimum temperature ranges from 12.4˚C - 13.7˚C with the (RH) Relative humidity of about 94%. The green house experiment was conducted at NM-AIST located at Tengeru compass along the old Moshi- Arusha road. The coordinates of NM-AIST lies between latitude (3˚3'83") S and longitude (36˚83'3") E, at an altitude of about 1250 m above sea level. The mean maximum temperature ranges from 23.6˚C to 27.5˚C whiles the mean minimum temperature ranges from 13˚C to 15.5˚C with RH of 96%. The field site is characterized with bimodal precipitation pattern with mean annual rainfall of 1200 mm, the experiment was conducted between Aprils to end of August 2014.
Experiments were conducted in Lyamungo (Field) and Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (Green house). The experiment was laid out in factorial arrangement. Factor I comprised of three climbing bean varieties (Cheupe, Selian 2005 and Selian 2006). Factor II involved two inoculation treatments, viz 1) inoculation with Rhizobium spp. and 2) without inoculation. Factor III included four fertilizer levels (0 Kg∙ha−1 20 Kg K∙ha−1, 30 Kg P∙ha−1 and 20 kg K + 30 Kg P∙ha−1). The experiment was replicated four times in both sites and Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 strain with a peat carrier supplied by Legume Technology United Kingdom was used to inoculate targeted seeds. The climbing beans were obtained from the breeder based at Selian Agricultural Research Institute, Northern zone Arusha, Tanzania. Land clearing was properly done and all the required land management practices such as ploughing, harrowing and field layout were performed first before embarking on planting. Few minutes before sowing, seeds were carefully mixed with Rhizobium inoculants to supply (109 cells/g seed), following procedure predetermined by products producer. Uninoculated seeds were sown first followed by inoculated seeds so as to avoid contamination. Seeds were sown at a spacing of 50 cm by 20 cm. The size of the plot was 4 m by 3 m, and the plant population density was 200,000 plants per hectare. Each plot had a total of 6 rows, two border rows which were left untouched and four middle rows from which the observation was made and samples were taken for analysis.
Three seeds were sown per hole and after full germination and establishment thinning was done leaving only two healthy plants per hill.
The field trial was performed at TACRI-Lyamungo. The trial was conducted during the long rainy season of Northern Tanzania. The field and green house trials were both planted on 7th and 14th of April, 2014 respectively and were harvested on 9th July 2014 for green house trials and 25th August 2014 for the field trials.
For the green house experiment, 4 kg soil pots were used. In order to ensure uniformity the soil used was collected from Lyamungo the same place where the field experiment was laid down; and each pot was planted with four seeds, and then thinned to two strong plants per pot after germination. In the field site the land was tractor ploughed and harrowed before planting. Sowing was done at a spacing of 50cm by 20cm starting with uninoculated plots followed by inoculated ones to avoid contamination. The plot size was 4m by 3m.
The weeding management was done three times one after every two weeks; however, the last one was done precautionary because plants were initiating flower buds.
The yield and yield component data was collected and recorded. The parameters recorded were seed yield per hactre, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and weight of 100 seeds grain. At 50% flowering the number of nodules were determined, this was done by selecting ten plants randomly from every sub plot; these plants were uprooted using a hand garden spade and number of nodules counted. This was done twice in the field at 2WAP and 6WAP while in the green house it was performed only once at 6WAP.
At harvesting stage, the plants in the two middle rows of every plot were counted and harvested for assessing grain yield. All the plant found in the border within each row was excluded. When estimating yield components, ten plants were selected from each plot to determine targeted parameters such as number of pod per plant and number of seeds per pod. All pods were hand threshed and allowed to dry to below 13% moisture content. Grain yield was determined for each plot and the seed yield per hactre computed based on the number of plant net plot harvested versus an equivalent of one hactre. Lastly, the 100-seed weight were weighed for each plot and recorded for analysis.
To assess the profitability of Rhizobium technology in climbing beans production, simple economic analysis was done and marginal net return (MNR) was calculated for every treatment using the formula:
where every letter denotes specific meaning as follows: Y is total yield of climbing bean grain (kg/ha), P denote the selling price at farm gate (USD/kg) and TVC is the total variable costs being the cost of all the inputs involved in the experiment. That is all costs which vary with production levels related to the treatment such as labour, fertilizers, seeds etc.
The selling price at farm gate was estimated to be Tsh.1500/= which is equivalent to US$ 0.91/kg of climbing beans. Thus the marginal rate of return (MRR) was computed using the formula:
MRR = MNR/TVC
The 3 ways analysis of variance (ANOVA) in Factorial arrangement was the statistical package used and the computation was performed by means of STATISTICA soft ware program. Then the treatment means was compared at (p = 0.05) significance level using fisher’s least significance difference (L.S.D).
Results show that rhizobial inoculation significantly (p < 0.01) increased shoot biomass at 6 WAP in the green house experiment relative to the control treatment. On the other hand in the field experiment rhizobial inoculation significantly (p < 0.001) increased shoot biomass 4 and 6 WAP relative to uninoculated control treatment. For example, rhizobial inoculation increased shoot biomass by 10% in the greenhouse experiment. Likewise, in the field experiment inoculation by Rhizobium increased root biomass 4 and 6 WAP by 63% and 5% respectively. Also shoot biomass increased by 31% and 14% in the field trials 4 and 6 WAP respectively (
Application of fertilizer (P + K) significantly (p ≤ 0.5), increased shoot biomass relative to control treatment in both field and green house experiments. Phosphorus increased shoot biomass in the field experiment at 4 WAP by 18% while the combination of P and K increased shoot biomass by 6% relative to the control treatment (
Likewise, the study revealed significantly (p ≤ 0.001) increase in root and shoot biomass of the 3 tested varieties in both field and green house experiments. For example, shoot and root biomass significantly increased at 4 and 6WAP relative to control treatment. Climbing bean variety Cheupe produced the highest root biomass in the green house compared with Selian 2005 and Selian 2006. Cheupe had mean root biomass of 2 g and 4 g in the field and green house respectively for the data collected 6WAP. However, Selian 2006 performed better in the field with the highest shoot biomass mean of 26 g and 42 g for the data collected 4 and 6 WAP in the field while in the green house the biomass was 38% and 22% respectively relative to other varieties (
The results in
Furthermore, rhizobial inoculation resulted into significant (p ≤ 0.001) increase in yield and yield components of the climbing bean relative to the control treatment in most components measured both in the field and green house. For example, rhizobial inoculation increased number of pods per plant by 5%, number of grain per pod by 26% in the green house trials. The field trials also indicated a significant increase by 20%, 29% and 30% on number of pods per plant, number of grain per pod and yield per hactre 6WAP relative to uninoculated control
GREEN HOUSE RESULTS | FIELD RESULTS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatments | Shoot biomass 6 WAP | Root biomass 6 WAP | Roots Biomass 4 WAP | Roots Biomass 6 WAP | Shoots Biomass 4 WAP | Shoots Biomass 6 WAP |
Rhizoium | ||||||
− | 24.02 ± 2.96b | 1.64 ± 0.03a | 1.87 ± 0.08a | 3.25 ± 0.07a | 16.56 ± 0.73a | 35.92 ± 1.23a |
+ | 26.63 ± 0.08a | 1.57 ± 0.03a | 5.06 ± 2.96a | 3.42 ± 0.07a | 24.00 ± 1.26b | 41.71 ± 1.57b |
Fertilizer | ||||||
Control | 25.83 ± 0.15a | 1.62 ± 0.03a | 1.99 ± 0.15a | 3.38 ± 0.14a | 19.21 ± 1.78a | 38.67 ± 2.18a |
20K | 24.21 ± 0.10a | 1.61 ± 0.05a | 1.87 ± 0.10a | 3.17 ± 0.08a | 18.21 ± 1.23a | 37.83 ± 2.15a |
30P | 26.44 ± 0.12a | 1.66 ± 0.04a | 2.07 ± 0.12a | 3.41 ± 0.09a | 23.38 ± 1.92b | 39.21 ± 2.14a |
30P + 20K | 24.79 ± 5.92a | 1.54 ± 0.04a | 7.93 ± 5.92b | 3.38 ± 0.09a | 20.33 ± 1.44ab | 39.54 ± 1.92a |
Varieties | ||||||
1: Cheupe | 26.69 ± 0.09a | 1.76 ± 0.03c | 2.24 ± 0.09a | 3.66 ± 0.09c | 16.06 ± 0.79a | 35.16 ± 1.62a |
2: Selian 05 | 24.63 ± 4.45a | 1.58 ± 0.04b | 6.10 ± 4.45a | 3.03 ± 0.05a | 19.06 ± 1.20b | 36.03 ± 1.31a |
3: Selian 06 | 24.66 ± 0.11a | 1.48 ± 0.02a | 2.05 ± 0.11a | 3.31 ± 0.09b | 25.72 ± 1.59c | 45.25 ± 1.87b |
3 WAY ANOVA (F stat) | ||||||
Rhiz | 10.41** | 3.11 ns | 1.16 ns | 3.11 ns | 43.14*** | 11.797*** |
Fert | 1.57 ns | 1.44 ns | 1.01 ns | 1.44 ns | 03.91* | 0.196 ns |
Variaties | 2.86 ns | 16.01*** | 0.79 ns | 16.01*** | 25.40*** | 14.664*** |
Rhiz × Fert | 0.41 ns | 0.14 ns | 0.96 ns | 0.14 ns | 01.20 ns | 0.497 ns |
Rhiz × Varieties | 4.77* | 0.73 ns | 0.92 ns | 0.73 ns | 06.46** | 2.425 ns |
Fert × Varieties | 0.68 ns | 0.74 ns | 1.03 ns | 0.74 ns | 0.44 ns | 2.446* |
Rhiz × Fert × Varieties | 0.07 ns | 0.23 ns | 1.01 ns | 0.23 ns | 0.40 ns | 1.432 ns |
R = without rhizobia, R+ = with rhizobia, P = Phosphorus K = Potassium, Values shown are for means ± SE; stars indicates significant at p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05 (***, ** and * respectively), ns = not significant, SE = standard error. Means followed by dissimilar letter(s) in a column are significantly different from each other at p=0.05 according to (LSD) Fischer least significance difference.
treatment (
Generally, fertilizer application showed significant (p ≤ 0.01) increase in the nodulation of the climbing beans in the green house experiment. The number of nodules significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased by 59%, 44% and 8% following addition of P, (P+K) and K respectively based on the count performed 6 WAP (
Additionally, supplementation of fertilizer revealed a significant increase in number of grain per pod (p ≤ 0.001) in the green house and number of pods per plant (p ≤ 0.01) in the field trials for data collected at 6WAP. For example, the number of grain per pod increased by 38%, 22% and 37% following the application of K, P and (P + K) fertilizers respectively relative to the control treatment. Furthermore, the number of pods per plant in the field experiment increased by 14% and 5% 6WAP after addition of K and P in a single doze respectively.
Additionally, rhizobial inoculation supplemented with fertilizer P and K showed significant (p ≤ 0.001) performance in the varieties tested on nodule formation in both experiments. For example, Selian 06 showed highest nodule number compared with Cheupe and Selian 05. At 6WAP, the mean nodule number recorded was 13,
10 and 6 respectively in the green house. The number of nodules recorded in the field was 9, 13, 9 for Cheupe, Selian 2006 and Selian 2005 for measurements taken at 2 WAP and 62, 47, 43 for Cheupe, Selian 2006 and Selian 2005 for data recorded at 6WAP in the field experiment.
The fiscal computational performed after harvesting revealed that this technology had a greater benefit when used in the production of climbing bean under field condition compared with the control treatment. For example, rhizobial inoculation alone produced a profit of US$ 2350 compared with control treatment which resulted to only US$ 1558 profit, which was finally reflected in higher percentage increase over control and higher marginal rate of return (MRR).
Likewise, the study revealed that application of P and K in combination resulted into highest profit compared with P or K alone. Despite the fact that P had shown highest value of percentage increase over control and
GREEN HOUSE | FIELD EXPERIMRNT RESULTS (YIELD) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TREATMENT | No. of nodules 6WAP | No. of pods per plant 6WAP | No. of grain/pod At Maturity | No. of root nodules 2WAP | No. of root nodules 6WAP | No. pods/plant 6WAP | No. of grain/pod AT HAVST | 100 grain WT(g) AT HARVST | Yield/Ha (Kg/Ha) |
Rhizobium | |||||||||
− (Without) | 03.50 ± 0.84a | 11.85 ± 0.68a | 3.52 ± 0.14b | 2.06 ± 0.35 a | 31.81 ± 2.32a | 6.17 ± 0.34b | 4.79 ± 0.13b | 34.02 ± 1.48a | 1958.99 ± 11337 b |
+ (With) | 16.88 ± 2.21b | 12.48 ± 0.73a | 4.77 ± 0.17a | 18.88 ± 0.95b | 70.25 ± 3.84b | 7.75 ± 0.31a | 6.75 ± 0.34a | 35.31 ± 1.66a | 2805.22 ± 240.92a |
Fertilizer | |||||||||
Control | 06.46 ± 1.47a | 12.08 ± 0.90a | 3.04 ± 0.19b | 9.21 ± 1.69a | 51.96 ± 7.18a | 6.75 ± 0.40b | 5.83 ± 0.50a | 34.92 ± 2.28a | 2243.97 ± 307.88a |
20K | 07.00 ± 1.87a | 11.17 ± 1.11a | 4.88 ± 0.24a | 11.38 ± 2.28a | 50.46 ± 5.68 a | 7.83 ± 0.56a | 5.38 ± 0.19a | 35.00 ± 2.26a | 2319.67 ± 225.08a |
30P | 15.75 ± 4.11b | 12.63 ± 0.93a | 3.88 ± 0.17c | 11.21 ± 2.18 a | 48.42 ± 6.35 a | 7.08 ± 0.54ab | 6.21 ± 0.61a | 34.46 ± 2.27a | 2438.67 ± 207.35a |
30P + 20K | 11.54 ± 2.35ab | 12.79 ± 1.05a | 4.79 ± 0.23a | 10.08 ± 1.86a | 53.29 ± 4.64a | 6.17 ± 0.40b | 5.67 ± 0.22a | 34.29 ± 2.18a | 2526.11 ± 361.12a |
Varieties | |||||||||
1:Cheupe | 10.75 ± 2.10ab | 13.16 ± 0.75a | 4.16 ± 0.24a | 9.06 ± 1.44a | 62.44 ± 6.19b | 5.00 ± 0.26b | 5.94 ± 0.34a | 34.94 ± 0.45b | 1612.88 ± 078.38c |
2:Selian 2005 | 06.47 ± 1.29a | 14.47 ± 0.88a | 4.09 ± 0.19a | 9.13 ± 1.40a | 43.19 ± 4.32a | 8.00 ± 0.48a | 6.09 ± 0.49a | 22.00 ± 0.16c | 2164.28 ± 188.87b |
3:Selian 2006 | 13.34 ± 3.18b | 8.88 ± 0.61b | 4.19 ± 0.24a | 13.22 ± 2.18 b | 47.47 ± 4.21a | 7.88 ± 0.26a | 5.28 ± 0.16a | 47.06 ± 0.96a | 3369.15 ± 291.03a |
3 WAY ANOVA (F stat) | |||||||||
Rhiz | 39.13*** | 86.27*** | 59.34*** | 362.95*** | 86.270*** | 23.04*** | 32.17 *** | 3.10 ns | 16.72*** |
Fert | 3.43* | 0.26 ns | 28.37*** | 1.339 ns | 0.256 ns | 4.45** | 1.02 ns | 0.22 ns | 0.37 ns |
Varieties | 4.47** | 7.95*** | 0.12 ns | 9.712*** | 7.954*** | 35.30*** | 2.08 ns | 388.54*** | 25.11*** |
Rhiz × Fert | 1.251 ns | 1.25 ns | 2.27 ns | 1.224 ns | 1.250 ns | 2.40 ns | 2.57 ns | 0.89 ns | 1.53 ns |
Rhiz × Varieties | 2.62 ns | 2.23 ns | 0.94 ns | 6.927*** | 2.231 ns | 2.75 ns | 2.23 ns | 2.82 ns | 8.29*** |
Fert × Varieties | 1.07 ns | 1.57 ns | 0.93 ns | 0.869 ns | 1.567 ns | 2.09 ns | 1.14 ns | 0.18 ns | 0.99 ns |
Rhiz × Fert × Variety. | 1.86 ns | 0.66 ns | 1.05 ns | 0.889 ns | 0.656 ns | 0.68 ns | 1.51 ns | 0.47 ns | 0.86 ns |
R = without rhizobia, R+ = with rhizobia, P = Phosphorus K = Potassium, Values shown are for means ± SE; stars indicates significant at p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05 (***, ** and * respectively), ns = not significant, SE = standard error. Means followed by dissimilar letter(s) in a column are significantly different from each other at p = 0.05 according to (LSD) Fischer least significance difference.
subsequently high value of marginal rate of return, its profit was below the treatment with combined P and K by 2%. Therefore, the combination of P and K produced a profit of US$ 2044, followed by P alone which gave the profit of US$ 2014 compared with control with US$. 1856 profit only. The percentage increase over control for P and its marginal rate of return was 39% and 8 respectively, followed by K with 36% and 7 percentage increases over control and marginal rate of return (MRR) respectively (
Similarly, all varieties performed differently despite of being exposed to the same experimental conditions. Selian 2006 performed better among the three varieties with the profit of $ 2,885 followed by Selian 2005 which gave a profit of US$ 1756 per hectare. However, Cheupe produced a profit of US$ 1219 and was the least performer in this study. Furthermore, Selian 2006 had highest percent increase over control (44%) and high marginal rate of return (11) relative to other varieties. Selian 2005 was the second best with 32% and 7, percentage
Treatment | Profit or MNR (US$/Ha) | % Increase over control (US$/Ha) | Total Variable Cost (US$/Ha) | Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhizobium | |||||
− | 1557.54 ± 106.38a | - | 265.34 ± 5.50a | 5.93 ± 0.42a | |
+ | 2349.56 ± 225.62b | 41.40 ± 4.63 | 280.34 ± 5.28b | 8.51 ± 0.82b | |
Fertilizer | |||||
Control | 1856.35 ± 290.16a | - | 220.03 ± 1.90a | 6.93 ± 0.75a | |
20K | 1901.02 ± 210.67a | 36.19 ± 6.11a | 273.67 ± 1.45ab | 7.36 ± 0.70a | |
30P | 2013.18 ± 194.17a | 38.57 ± 7.47a | 273.07 ± 1.45ab | 8.33 ± 1.26a | |
30P + 20K | 2043.64 ± 338.02a | 28.67 ± 9.60a | 324.59 ± 1.45b | 6.26 ± 1.02a | |
Varieties | |||||
1:Cheupe | 1218.73 ± 072.74a | 11.39 ± 5.89a | 272.84 ± 6.78a | 4.52 ± 0.29a | |
2:Selian 2005 | 1756.17 ± 176.21b | −3.23 ± 4.83a | 272.84 ± 6.78a | 6.48 ± 0.63b | |
3:Selian 2006 | 2885.74 ± 271.53c | −5.0 ± 13.84a | 272.84 ± 6.78a | 10.66 ± 0.99c | |
3 WAY ANOVA (F stat) | |||||
Rhizobium | 16.77*** | 11.25*** | 8.39*** | 13.56*** | |
Fertilizer | 0.21 ns | 0.26 ns | 6.79*** | 1.53 ns | |
Variaties | 25.80*** | 1.14 ns | 0.0 ns | 26.57*** | |
+R: With rhizobia; −R: Without rhizobia; R: rhizobia; P: Phosphorus; K: Potassium, SE = standard error; Values presented are means (±SE); Stars indicates significant at p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05 (***, ** and * respectively), ns = not significant, Means followed by dissimilar letter(s) in a column are significantly different from each other at p = 0.05 according to Fischer least significance difference (LSD).
increase over control and marginal rate of return respectively. Likewise, Cheupe was the least among the three varieties with 11% increase over control and a marginal rate of return of 5. The economic analysis and profitability aspects in this study was established based on revenues and variable costs both for materials and labour as shown in
The results in the
The study on rhizobial inoculation and supplementation with fertilizer (TSP and MOP) as source of P and K in production of climbing legumes was conducted in Northern Tanzania. The aim of the study was to determine total yield and economic benefit of climbing beans when supplied with the aforementioned inputs, in single or in combination.
The results obtained revealed that Rhizobium inoculation had a significant increase in yield and yield components of three climbing beans varieties tested (Cheupe, Selian 2005 and Selian 2006). The improved results on yield and its component signifies how much Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 strain with a peat carrier supplied by Legume Technology United Kingdom was effective in causing nodulation and ultimately improved nitrogen
Input | Amount/ha | Unit price (T.shs.) | Unit price (US$) | Total cost (T.shs.) | Total cost (US$) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climbing Beas Seeds | 18 kg | 2500 | 1.52 | 45,000 | 27.3 |
Inoculants: (Rhizobium tropici CIAT899) | 2 packets (100 g @) | 1500 | 0.91 | 3000 | 1.82 |
Fertilizer (TSP) | 1 | 65,000 | 39.4 | 65,000 | 39.4 |
Fertilizer (MOP) | 1 | 64,000 | 38.8 | 64,000 | 38.8 |
TOTAL | 177,000 | 107.32 |
Activities | Unit &/Amount (Mandays) | Unit cost (T.shs.) | Total variable cost (T.shs.) | Total variable Cost in (US$) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Land preparation | Tractor | 60,000 | 60,000 | 36.4 |
Planting per hactre | 6 | 10,000 | 30,000 | 18.2 |
Weeding 3 rounds | 10 | 10,000 | 100,000 | 60.6 |
Crop harvesting per hactre | 5 | 10,000 | 50,000 | 30.3 |
Threshing and processing/100 kg | 4 | 10,000 | 40,000 | 24.2 |
Fertilizer application: | ||||
Rhizobial inoculation | 2 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 12.12 |
30 kg P | 2 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 12.12 |
20 kg K | 2 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 12.12 |
Inoculation + 30 kg P + 20 KG K | 3 | 10,000 | 30,000 | 18.18 |
TOTAL | 370,000 | 224.24 |
NB: The total Variable cost per hactre stand at US$ 107.32 +224.24 = US$ 331.56.
fixation, thus, providing adequate nitrogen which would have been supplied with nitrogenous fertilizer responsible for yield and yield components performance relative to control treatment.
Despite the positive outcome observed, the literatures show that such related findings were also reported by [
components such as increase in number of nodules per plant, shoot and root biomass, nodule fresh weight, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant and 100 seed weight per treatment following inoculation with specific Rhizobium strain. The study also showed high rate of nodulation at second week after planting compared with the number observed at 50% flowering.
Phosphorus and potassium fertilization resulted in significant effect on number of pods per plant, number of nodules, number of grains per pod, plant dry matter, 100 seed weight and total grain yield relative to unfertilized treatments. The improved yield components of climbing bean over control may be attributed by the availability of adequate P and K which are essential nutrients for nodulation, photosynthesis, pod development, grain filling and improves seed quality in leguminous crops [
Higher nodulation is associated with higher nitrogen fixation and ultimately yield and yield parameters. The study by [
Furthermore, the study revealed a significant interaction between Rhizobium and varieties on the number of nodules per plant and yield/Ha (
more responsive to inoculation than other varieties.
Also there were interactive effect between rhizobial and varieties on shoot biomass for both experiment in the field and green house. Inoculations influenced the shoot biomass which is the base for carbohydrates formation and finally yield.
The impact of fertilizer application and subsequently rhizobial inoculation in common beans and its associated grain yield was reflected in economic component of the farmer’s income. According to the fiscal analysis of the study which was based on Revenues and Variable costs (
Likewise, this study revealed that application of P and K in combination resulted in to highest profit compared with when P or K was used alone. Despite the fact that P- fertilizer had shown highest value of percentage increase over control and subsequently high value of marginal rate of return, its profit was below the combined P and K treatment by 2%. Therefore, the combination of P and K produced a profit of US$ 2044, followed by P alone which gave the profit of US$ 2014 compared with the zero fertilizer treatment with a profit of US$ 1856. The percentage increase over control for P and its marginal rate of return was 39% and 8 respectively, followed by K with 7 marginal rate of return (MRR). Thus, P application treatment was significantly more profitable compared with the combination of P and K due to its high MRR and low TVC (
This study has shown that rhizobial inoculation technology supplemented with fertilizer (P and K) increased number of nodules per plant, number of pods per plant, above and below ground biomass and 100 grain weight of climbing bean varieties grown in glass house and field experiment. The fiscal analysis indicated that Rhizobium inoculated plots significantly (p ≤ 0.001) increased the marginal net return (net profit) over un-inoculated treatments. Such pleasing results were also obtained with fertilizer application especially when P was used alone. For farmers to realize profit in climbing bean production, Rhizobium inoculation and supplementation with P and/or K fertilizers are of paramount importance in northern Tanzania.
I am indebted to the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) and the Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) of Tanzania for the financial support which made this study possible. Special thanks to Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) for allowing us to use their site for the experiment.
George W.Mmbaga,KelvinM. Mtei,Patrick A.Ndakidemi, (2015) Yield and Fiscal Benefits of Rhizobium Inoculation Supplemented with Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) in Climbing Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Northern Tanzania. Agricultural Sciences,06,783-797. doi: 10.4236/as.2015.68076