In the Mexican tropics the guava trees can grow and produce in any season, so they can be har-vested out of the period of high competition marketing (Summer). It studied the growth kinetics of leaves and fruits of guava trees at the dry tropical conditions of the State of Guerrero, in guava trees of four years old and was evaluated a non-destructive method for measuring leaf area from November to May. 100 sheets of 10 randomly selected trees were cut. It was found that leaf length X the width X 0.72581647 (conversion factor) gave an estimated leaf area which was significantly correlated with that obtained by the integrator of leaf area. Both in length and width the leaf growth kinetics were sigmoid with three growth stages: In Stage I (15 days) leaves grew 21.2% and 21.5%; in Stage II (26 days) grew 73.6% and 68%; and in Stage III (30 days). They Increased 5.2% and 10.5% in the primary and secondary sprouts. The fruit growth in its equatorial and polar diameters corresponded to a double sigmoid kinetics. In Stage I (61 days) it reached 1.9 and 2.3 cm; in Stage II (62 - 102 days) it reached 3.09 and 3.62 cm; and in Stage III (103 to 126 days) it reached 4.63 and 5.13 cm, as well the physiological maturity of fruit.
Globally, India is the most important in the production of guava with 1.8 million tons annually grown on 150,000 ha. Mexico ranks second with a production volume of more than 300,000 tones, spread over 23,900 ha are grown in 19 states, of which protrude Aguascalientes, Michoacán and Zacatecas with 21,000 ha, representing 88% of the total area [
In Iguala, Guerrero, guava vegetative buds form during most of the year, although higher flows are in July, September and January. Along with the formation of buds, floral development occurs, so there is also formation of flowers for most of the year. But the main fruiting begins in winter, so that fruit production is in summer [
In Maracaibo, Venezuela, the time between the mooring of the fruit (flowers with stamens withered) and ripening (yellow skin fruit and good consistency) from 121 days to 114 days after lashing the fruit begins to change from green pale yellow one [
The rate of ripening of guava Red Creole type and San Miguel in Mara, Zulia, Venezuela, reflects that during this process the fruit shows changes in color, ranging from green to yellow due to pigments such as flavones, anthocyanins and carotenoids providing secondary colors, on a primary color, green or yellow generally determined by the presence of chlorophyll or xanthophyll [
Studying the behavior of plants should be performed based on the phenomena of weather, that through this basic knowledge, defined rational handling of crops; also, consider nutrition and pesticide application, depending on the requirements and the phenological stages of the plant [
One of the main problems in the production of guava in Mexico is that the harvest is concentrated in summer- autumn, causing reduction in the price of fruit. Because of this we should take advantage of the plasticity of guava to vegetate and produce at any time of the year in order to get the crop out of the period of increased competition [
The study was done in Iguala, Guerrero, Mexico, located at the geographical coordinates 18˚20'37.4'' LN and 99˚30'06.8'' LW, at an altitude of 771 m (GPS Garmin eTrex 10®). The climate is Awo (W) (i') g, the driest of the sub-humid, with average annual temperature of 25.5˚C and average annual rainfall of 1067 mm, with rainfall in summer (June to September) and presence of intermission drought in July and August [
The trees selected had four years of age; propagated from air-layers; acquired in Coatepec, Flours, State of Mexico. The trees was gravity irrigation applied, from November to April, in intervals of 20 days; no edaphic and foliar fertilizer; no pruning was performed; hand weeding is performed. Regarding phytosanitary problems, was presented only the fruit fly (Anastrepha spp.), it was controlled with weekly applications of Malathion 1000® (2 ml∙L−1 water); during the period from August to December (fruit set to harvest).
The period of evaluation was conducted in November 2011 to May 2012. The crop irrigation was applied from November 30 to April 30, at interval of 20 days, no was done pruning and not fertilizer appli. The fruit fly (Anastrepha spp.) Was monitored weekly applications of Malathion 1000® (2 mL∙Liter−1 of water).
To observe the kinetics of growth was measured daily center width and length of the leaf 10 and five leaves/shoot primary and secondary respectively, reaching constant values throughout (physiological maturity).
To determine the leaf area of 10 trees measured the length and width (in cm) of 100 leaves taken at random and each of these leaves was determined the area integrator LI-3100 leaf area (Licor, Inc.). For the analysis of the data, was made analysis of variance, comparison of means by Tukey test, Pearson correlation and regression coefficient; using the values of length, width, length X width leaves and leaf area registered with integrator LI-3100 (Licor, Inc.). With the values obtained, the conversion factor was calculated and multiplied by the length, width and length X width of 10 leaves of six primary shoots and five leaves of six secondary shoots; the value obtained was compared to the leaf area obtained through the integrator Ll-3100. All the analyses were performed using SAS package (Statistical Analysis System, Version 8.00) [
For fruit growth kinetics of four trees were measured daily 10 fruits/tree recently tied regarding equatorial diameter (ED) and polar diameter (DP), until they reached physiological maturity and consume. Physiological maturity was considered when the fruit changed from green to green-yellow, and consume when switched completely green-yellow to yellow. The values obtained were the result of the average of the 10 fruits of each tree and finally the average of the four trees. The data analysis was to estimate the program averages Excel, Version 2000.
The leaf growth rate showed a sigmoid curve length and width of leaves of primary and secondary shoots (
The newly formed leaves of primary and secondary shoots averaged 0.8 and 0.2 cm in length and width, respectively, but to reach its maximum size median 11.1 and 11.4 cm long and 5.1 to 5.2 cm wide. These leaf dimensions are within the ranges presented guava leaves of the town of Calvillo, Aguascalientes (place of origin of the genetic material of the present study), ranging from 5 - 18 cm long and 3 to 6.5 cm wide [
This regional germplasm presents morphological and biochemical high variability between and within orchards producing because they spread by seed and root suckers [
To calculate leaf area was determined a regression coefficient between the value of length, width or length X width, with the value of the leaf area integrator. It was found that when using the long blade width X multiplied by its conversion factor (0.72581647), leaf area is very similar to that obtained by integrating the leaf area this aspect is important because it allows to estimate the leaf area without expensive equipment and because the characteristics of the leaves are those that best explain the phenotypic variability of guava trees [
Instead, by using the value of length of the blades multiplied by the conversion factor (4.96351652), the estimated area is greater than 15 cm2 leaf areas directly measure the integrator, likewise, the area estimated by width product leaves its conversion factor (10.4234197), is greater in 13 cm2 leaf area of the integrator (
To confirm and support the results of the regression coefficient, were performed two types of analysis, one of variance and Pearson correlation, finding highly significant differences in the four variables assessed in the leaves of guava cv. “average Chinese” in the analysis of variance (
And in analyzing the Pearson correlation the effect was highly significant in the four variables measured in the 10 guava trees, cv. “average Chinese” (
Once the best conversion factor to estimate the area of each leaf was calculated the individual leaf area of each leaf. This was taken into account that the guava tree formed an average of 20 leaves per bud new primary, of which during the sampling period just 10 reached physiological maturity to these 10 leaves were taken individually their long and wide, and thus calculated the length X width product. A similar procedure was used to estimate leaf area with length and width values of each sheet by multiplying their respective conversion factors (4.96351652 for
Variables | Tree | Rep | Error | Fc | cv | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AF | 1564.27 | 156.64 | 74.96 | 11.48** | 28.01 | 30.91 cm2 |
L | 62.07 | 3.85 | 1.86 | 33.34** | 15.04 | 9.07 cm |
A | 9.56 | 1.06 | 0.46 | 20.97** | 16.14 | 4.18 cm |
LXA | 2751.63 | 239.53 | 101.34 | 27.15** | 24.82 | 40.55 cm2 |
GL | 9 | 9 | 81 |
Rep = Repetition; Fc = F calculated; cv% = Coefficient of variation; GL = Degrees of freedom; AF = Leaf area; L = Length of leaf; A = Leaf width; LXA = length for width; ** = Highly significant.
long, 10.4234197 for width and length X width 0.72581647 for). The areas obtained were as follows: In Stage I, which took 15 days, the leaves reached an area of 14, 10 and 2 cm2 respectively estimated length, width and length X width. In Stage II (25 days), the leaf had an estimated area of 55, 53 and 39 cm2 based on the length, width and length X width, respectively. Finally, in Stage III (31 days) the estimated values of leaf area were 55, 53 and 43 cm2 when calculated with the length, width and length X width respectively. I mean, there were differences between the methods in terms of estimated leaf area, so that the product long X wide, as indicated above, proved to be the most appropriate method for estimating the guava leaf area, which is useful when there isn’t an integrating machine offs a leaf area (Figures 3(a)-(c)).
AF | L | A | LXA | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AF | 1.000 | 0.9219** 0.0001 | 0.8172** 0.0001 | 0.9263** 0.0001 |
L | 1.000 | 0.8246** 0.0001 | 0.9566** 0.0001 | |
A | 1.000 | 0.9232** 0.0001 | ||
LXA | 1.000 |
AF = Leaf area; L = Length of leaf; A = Leaf width; LXA = Length for width; ** = Highly significant.
Because the literature has not found the most suitable frequency to record the values of fruit growth, in this research was measured every 1, 5 and 8 days. Found that the journal and the take up every 5 days, showed no significant changes in the size of the result of measurement to another, whereas in the samples measured every 8 days if there were differences between two consecutive, in the equatorial diameter as in the polar. As a result, to obtain the growth kinetics of the fruit is sufficient to measure their size every 8 days. However, daily data allow building a more accurate curve and achieve greater reliability of the kinetics of growth, for more data.
The growth curve of the fruit of guava showed double-sigmoid growth (
Stage II, from 62 to 102 days (January-February), was characterized by slow growth for the fruit barely reached 3.09 and 3.62 cm equatorial and polar diameter, respectively, the difference in growth compared the first stage was 0.55 and 0.65 cm, respectively. In Stage III, 103 to 126 days (Feb-Mar), was located physiological maturity and fruit
consume; until physiological maturity growth was rapid and the fruit reached values of 4.63 and 5.13 cm in polar and equatorial diameter, at this stage of fruit growth elongation is given by the dependent cellular plasticity and turgor pressure of the cells [
To reach physiological maturity and consume, this research elapsed 120 and 126 days, respectively. A similar period was reported by Labarca et al. [
The fruit growth rate was 0.032 and 0.038 and 0.013 and 0.015 cm by day−1 in the equatorial and polar diameters, in Stages I and II, respectively, while in the third the rate was 0.085 and 0.084 (physiological maturity) and 0.061 and 0.039 cm by day−1 (ripe), for polar and equatorial diameters, respectively. In the production area of Calvillo, Aguascalientes, Mexico, during Phase I gradually decreases growth of 0.6 to 0.1 mm/by day−1; during Phase II growth is below 0.1 mm/day−1 and III during the growth is increased from 0.1 to 0.9 mm/day−1 [
Leaf area calculated with a length X width of the leaves, and then multiplied by the respective conversion factor (0.72581647) is similar to that obtained by the integrator leaf area. Leaves showed sigmoid growth and fruit growth double sigmoid type in both cases three steps: for Stage II leaves was the fastest, whereas for fruit was reversed, Stages I and III, were faster compared with Phase II. The time interval between sampling and sampling sufficient to monitor guava fruit growth is eight days.