This study presents an analysis of equivalent circuit namely Butterworth Van Dyke (BVD) [1,2] by using impedance method to stimulate Zirconate Titanate ( Piezoelectric ceramic) which is initially synthesized from Lead Oxide (PbO), Zirconium Dioxide (ZrO2) and Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and vibrated in thickness mode. The reactance was estimated in the frequency range lower than the resonance frequency and then compared to the impedance obtained from meas urement using impedance analysis machine model HP4192A and HP4194 [ 3 ]. The results from HP4194 were analyzed for BVD parameters: Motional resistance (R1), Inductor (L1), Capacitor (C1), and Capacitor corresponds to the electro static capacitance (C o ). Another accuracy analysis was compared by the calculation results using the method of IEEE 176-1987 [ 4 ] to the impedance values measured by HP4192A. In this study, there were two conditions for experiment and consideration of parameter variation in BVD equivalent circuit: variation of temperature and mechanical force. These parameters are evaluated to design the efficient circuit for PZT utilization to obtain the optimal efficiency.
Electronic circuit using BVD analysis for effectively stimulating PZT can be designed by adopting, for example, IEEE Standard [4,5], Smits [
Electrical characteristics in thickness mode of PZT [
and L1 then all parallelly connected to Co [1,2,11] as shown in
Assuming R1, C1, L1, and Co were constants and independent on frequency and impedance [
The calculation of BVD circuit using impedance method by the capacitor ratio (r) is as shown in Equation (2), where wa is the angular velocity of the anti-resonance frequency (2pfa) and wr is the angular velocity of the resonance frequency (2pfr).
The reactance values of C1 and L1 in BVD circuit at low frequency range was observed. It was noted that the reactance of PZT was performed as a capacitor as shown in Equation (3).
Therefore,
Then the impedance equation of PZT can be revised as shown in Equation (5).
C1 can be calculated as given in Equation (6) by choosing the impedance measured at low frequency range where w is the angular velocity of the selected frequency and R is |Z| measured at resonance frequency.
Measurement of K or relative permittivity (er) of PZT is to test for the electrical characteristics which can be calculated by using Equation (7), where Cf is the capacitance at 1 kHz, t is the thickness of PZT measured from both metal poles, A is the area of metal pole, and eo is the dielectric constant of vacuum. The dielectric constant can be varied depending on the temperature (T) of substance based on Curie-Weiss Law [
Equations (7) and (8) can also be revised as shown in Equation (9).
The value of d33, measured by Piezo-D meter model CADT (Channel Products Inc.), implies the ability to emit the electric charge of PZT when it is stimulated by mechanical force. Number 33 represents the three perpendicular directions of compression force on PZT.
Electromechanical coupling coefficient (kt) represents the efficiency of transformation from electrical energy to mechanical force. In Equation (10), Δf is the difference between fr and fa.
Qm represents the maximum ability of mechanical vibration in fr range where R1 is the impedance at resonance frequency as given in Equation (11).
The PZT with 40 mm of diameter and 3 mm of thickness is electrode by silver paste at the top and the bottom as shown in
shown in
From experiment and measurement of PZT impedance, the calculated parameters from BVD model are as shown in
Physical characteristics of PZT were experimented by considering r, PZT constant (d33), kt, and Qm of electrical charge at 1 kHz. In this study, only the results from N01 and N04 (details are given in
the PZT experimental system connected with impedance analysis model HP4192A under temperature conditions.
Measuring the PZT impedance under room temperature was for assessing the influences of temperature on PZT impedance and comparing the results under room temperature and controlled temperature at various frequency. Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the PZT impedance
of N01 and N04 repeatedly measured 5 times by impedance analysis model HP4192A under room temperature at the frequency of 1 kHz to 80 kHz.
PZT was experimented by placing on heater plate in vacuum chamber under controlled temperature. The temperature can be controlled by a program developed on HP Vee via HP-IB port as shown in
interval of measurement and the frequency was varied from 2 kHz to 80 kHz. Uncertainty of measurement and PZT was estimated by repeating 3 times of measurement.
The impedance of PZT in temperature controlled chamber (only N01) under specific temperature was similar to that under room temperature. However, it was observed that fr and fa were drifted. At 230˚C, fr increased about »1.6 kHz while fa decreased about »1 kHz. Therefore, the difference between fr and fa decreased about 2.6 kHz as shown in
Experiment of PZT in the range of 100 Hz to 10 kHz was to calculate the impedance of BVD circuit by repeatedly measuring 30 times. An average and standard deviation of impedance are given in Figures 14 and 15, respectively. It can be noted that the standard deviation would increase at low frequency range and decrease as the frequency is rising.
To calculate BVD circuit, average experimental values of fr, fa, and Zr at selected frequency ranging from 0.1 kHz to 10 kHz were used and then BVD parameters were obtained. The results were ranged as follows: L1 » 0.16 mH to 0.2 mH, C1 » 0.018 nF to 0.040 nF, Co » 0.06 nF to 0.18 nF. However, R1 was uniform due to the identical impedance at fr as shown in
When PZT was placed in the temperature controlling chamber at 23˚C, C1 would be decrease by 72% or 0.726%/˚C that leads to 255% of increase in L1. Therefore, the temperature would directly influence the char-
where s is the standard deviation.
acteristics of PZT as provided in
The parameters which was use in consideration of physical and electrical characteristics of PZT consists of r, d33, kt, and Qm at 1 kHz. In this case, comparison of N02 and N03 is as shown in
Measurement of Zr under mechanical force was performed by using 0.5 lbs, 1.0 lbs, and 1.5 lbs of brass standard weights at room temperature. Each measurement was varied the frequency starting from 2 kHz to 80 kHz and repeated 30 times for calculating an average value. Figures 16(a) and (b) illustrate the experimental system and the brass standard weights, respectively.
Standard weights (0.5 lbs, 1.0 lbs, and 1.5 lbs) were pressed to estimate fr, fa, and Zr as shown in
A capacitor (1.097 nF, 1.46 nF, 1.92 nF, 4.48 nF, 5.92 nF, 8.97 nF, and 33.016 nF) was connected serially with a given PZT (N02 and N03) and then, fr, fa, and Zr were
measured. The relationships of fs/2 (fsCL-fs) are as illustrated in Figures 17-20 where fs is the serial resonance frequency based on IEEE method [4,5]. The slope of linear relationship is 1/C1 as shown in
The average values of fr, fa, and Zr at resonance frequency obtained from experiments of N02 and N03 were used for analyzing BVD. By selecting the frequency ranging from 0.1 kHz to 10 kHz, it can be observed that
Co » 0.06 nF, C1 » 0.018 nF, L1 » 0.184 mH to 0.190 mH while R1 was identical due to the same impedance at fr as given in
Variation of fr, fa, and Zr when PZT was pressed by standard weights was calculated for Co, C1, and L1 by impedance method. The differences are given in
From calculation, it was observed that |Z| and Z(θ) of the impedance ranging from low frequency to fr and fa tended to be equal to the impedance measured by impedance analysis model HP4192A. Selecting low frequency range (100 Hz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz) for calculating C would cause the error of |Z| by »−1%, On the other hand, selecting the impedance and frequency at 3 kHz the error would be exhibit less than 1%. However, the impedance and frequency at 14 kHz would exhibit the greater error by »5% because wL can much influence the impedance while 1/wL decreases. Therefore, the impedance selected for calculating should have the frequency lower than. Considering the percentage of impedance error, it can noted that the impedance at the frequency of 100 Hz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz would provide the similar results with 20% - 25% of the maximum error of fa. From experiment of the calculated impedance, the accuracy of fr and fa was ±0.0033 kHz with the standard deviation of 0.00129 kHz which would be reliable for calculating BVD circuit. From experiment of accuracy which was compared between Zr of BVD equivalent circuit and Zr from measurement, it can be noted that Zr at fr of BVD circuit calculated by impedance method and IEEE 176-1987 would exhibit the error by »2.37% which was lower than HP4194 method (»4%). It would be because the impedance analysis using impedance analysis model HP4192A is applied the program to estimate fr more accurately. However, R1 was less different as it was a specific resistance at resonance frequency. Considering the influence of temperature on PZT characteristic, it was noted that the increase of temperature would contribute to less difference of fr and fa.
However, the increase of Zr would cause the variation of BVD calculated parameters such as decrease of C1, increase of R1, L1, and Co. On the other hand, the influences of mechanical force load on PZT parameters would cause fr, fa, and Zr increase that also contribute to R1 and C1 increase while L1 and Co decrease.