Milroy, J. (2000). Historical description and the ideology of the standard language. In L. Wright (Ed.), The development of standard English, 1300-1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts (pp. 11-28). Cambridge, UK: CUP.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Paradigm Consistency and the Depiction of Stiltedness: The Case of than I versus than me

  AUTHORS: Douglas J. Wulf

  KEYWORDS: Modern English; Grammar; Prescriptive Grammar; Errors of Usage; Correctness; Stiltedness; Ambiguity; Applied Linguistics

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, Vol.2 No.3, September 25, 2012

  ABSTRACT: Close adherence to prescriptive rules of grammar can sometimes produce stilted language, which can impart to language a pompous or stuffy impression. It is ironic that an island of potential unacceptability can arise within what is regarded as Standard English. In instances where prescriptive grammaticality and sociolinguistic appropriateness are in opposition, disagreements over language use can occur. Despite its impact, stiltedness has received little scholarly attention, probably because it is an intangible, subjective phenomenon. This paper investigates an indirect way to depict stiltedness through a quantitative measure. The example selected to demonstrate this approach is the rule of bare pronouns in comparative sentences. With tangible quantitative measurements of paradigm consistency and inconsistency, stiltedness may perhaps be understood more effectively.