Bi, L. L. (2007). The Explanatory Power of the “Multiple-Stream Framework” on China’s Policy Process: Taking the Jiangsu-Zhejiang Inter-Administrative Water Pollution Prevention and Control Policy Process as an Example. Journal of Public Management, No. 2, 36-41. (In Chinese)

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: An Analysis of the Setting of Educational Policy Agenda under the Perspective of “Multiple-Streams Theory”—Taking the Promulgation of “Several Provisions Prohibiting Obstacles to Compulsory Education” as an Example

  AUTHORS: Runzhao Rao

  KEYWORDS: Compulsory Education, Multiple-Streams Theory, Controlling Dropouts, Policy Agenda

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.8 No.2, February 10, 2020

  ABSTRACT: The problem of “active dropout” for urban children is a new problem faced by the work of “controlling dropouts” in compulsory education. This article uses a case study method to analyze the policy agenda of “Several Provisions Prohibiting Obstacles to Compulsory Education Implementation” from the perspective of Multiple-Streams Theory. The results show that: in this case, the three streams in the Multiple-Streams framework interact with each other and basically follow the development trajectory of “problem source-political source stream-policy source stream” in the Chinese context of the Multiple-Streams Theory; The opening of the window is a unity of contingency and inevitability; Key policy entrepreneurs actively advocated and played a huge role in the eventual establishment of the policy agenda.