See Scotland Analysis (2013) Devolution and the Implications of Scottish Independence, February 2013, in which we see in its annex, on which the report is largely built, all reflection revolves around the Treaty of Union, 1707, from which some conclusions are obtained: The union was made freely by Scotland and England and this led to the dissolution of Scotland as a state, so there can be no reversion. And that Treaty does not currently sound as a treaty in international law. These statements enable them to conclude that the rest of the UK will continue to exercise the existing powers of the United Kingdom itself, Scotland being born as a new state, with all the disadvantages that such birth entails, especially initiating its incorporation into the European Union.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Democratic Principle and the Right to Decide: The Case of Catalan Secession

  AUTHORS: José J. Jiménez Sánchez

  KEYWORDS: Democracy, Right to Decide, Sovereign Power

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Access Library Journal, Vol.1 No.6, September 24, 2014

  ABSTRACT: These pages reflect on the connection, at first sight evident, between the democratic principle and the right to decide. However, this work highlights some of the contradictions in which certain of its supporters fall and it defends. On the contrary, the need to establish that the relationship between the principle of the rule of law and the democratic principle cannot give either preeminence over the other. The reason lies in that the democratic principle cannot be understood as the mere sum of particular wills of a specific community, but rather as an expression of the conditions that ensure the formation of a rational political will. The democratic principle can only be understood from a normative, and not factual, conception of sovereign power.