McWhorter, J. (2003). Against Reparations. In R. A. Winbush (Ed.), Should America Pay? Slavery and the Raging Debate on Reparations (pp. 180-196). New York: Amistad Harper Collins Publishers.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Politics of Reparations: The Academic Epistemic Communities and the Implications of Reparation Debate on African-American and Africa’s Quest for Reparations

  AUTHORS: Emmanuel E. Obuah

  KEYWORDS: Reparations, Epistemic Communities, Tort Model, Atonement

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Political Science, Vol.6 No.1, January 7, 2016

  ABSTRACT: The discourse on reparation for African Americans has gained impulse and will continue to gain significance in the future. The reparation scholarship reached new levels since the 1980s due to the impetus from the legislative precedent set by the US Congress in passing the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 which provided the basis for compensation to Japanese Americans interned during the Second World War. As for reparations for Africa and other nations that suffered under the transatlantic slave trade and the European colonialism, there is an absence of political will to articulate demands for reparations for and present them at international forums. This paper examines the existing scholarship on reparation for African America. To understand the key arguments, the paper identified three main broad academic epistemic communities and other subdivisions on reparations for African Americans and Africa. It is hoped that this paper will provide some insights to policy makers and scholars.