Link, G. (1983). The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach. In R. B. Scwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language (pp. 303-323). Mouton de Gruyter.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.302

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Towards a Proper Treatment of “NP-Related” Floating Numeral Quantifiers in Japanese

  AUTHORS: Kenji Yokota

  KEYWORDS: Floating Numeral Quantifiers, Japanese, Referential Nominals, Pronouns

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, Vol.5 No.4, August 24, 2015

  ABSTRACT: One of the central questions in linguistics is whether or not the Japanese floating numeral quantifier (FNQ) is always a distributive operator, as Gunji and Hasida (1998), Nakanishi (2004, 2007, 2008), and Kobuchi (2003, 2007) contend. This paper argues against their view and that the interpretive ambiguity is resolved if the semantic ambiguity arises due to the existence of the two different types of FNQs. It is argued that, discourse-semantically, what is crucial to the distinction between the two types of FNQs is whether an FNQ is interpreted via quantificational adverbs or quantificational determiners. This distinction is required when variance in FNQ interpretation is considered. In particular, it is shown that NP-related FNQs have much in common with referential (-like) nouns, functioning as discourse anaphoric items.